Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
D

Failure to Accommodate Resident Food Preferences

Tamaqua, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 04-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accommodate individual food preferences for residents, as evidenced by multiple observations and interviews. One resident consistently received meals containing eggs and Brussels sprouts, despite documented dislikes for these items on his meal ticket, and was not offered alternative options. During a meal observation, this resident was served Brussels sprouts, and he expressed ongoing dissatisfaction with the lack of alternatives. Another resident reported repeatedly receiving broccoli on his meal tray, even though his meal ticket indicated a dislike for broccoli, and the dietary manager confirmed that no alternate vegetable was provided when broccoli was on the menu. Additionally, during a group interview, a resident stated that only one vegetable option was available per meal, and no alternatives were offered if a resident disliked the provided vegetable. The nursing home administrator was unable to provide documentation showing efforts to accommodate these food preferences. These findings demonstrate that the facility did not make sufficient efforts to honor resident food preferences, as required, to enhance meal satisfaction.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙