Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
E

Failure to Ensure Timely Physician Review of Pharmacist Recommendations

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that pharmacist recommendations from monthly medication regimen reviews were reviewed and acted upon by physicians in a timely manner for three of five residents reviewed. For one resident, the pharmacist recommended adjusting the timing of insulin lispro administration to align with meal times, and although the physician indicated agreement and signed the recommendation, the clinical record and medication administration record did not reflect any change to the order. For another resident, the pharmacist recommended ordering specific laboratory tests to monitor medication safety and efficacy, and while the physician wrote that the labs were ordered and signed the document, there was no corresponding physician order for the labs in the clinical record. Additionally, the pharmacist suggested changing the administration time of tamsulosin to after dinner for better absorption, but the physician disagreed with the recommendation, and the document was not signed or dated by the physician. For a third resident, the pharmacist recommended adding weekly blood pressure and pulse monitoring due to ongoing antihypertensive therapy. The document had an "OK" written on it, but lacked a physician signature or date, and there was no evidence in the clinical record that the recommendation was reviewed or acted upon. An interview with the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no documentation showing that these recommendations were noted and completed. These findings indicate a failure to follow facility policy and regulatory requirements for timely physician review and documentation of pharmacist recommendations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙