Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0677
D

Failure to Provide Scheduled Showers for Dependent Resident

Portland, Oregon Survey Completed on 04-28-2025

Penalty

Fine: $149,783
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a dependent resident received showers as scheduled, resulting in a deficiency related to activities of daily living (ADLs). The resident, who was admitted with dementia and had a catheter due to urine retention and bowel incontinence, was care planned to receive bathing or showering twice weekly or per preference. Documentation showed that the resident was dependent on staff for bathing and did not refuse showers. However, bathing logs indicated that the resident did not consistently receive showers according to the scheduled days, with significant gaps between shower dates. Interviews with the resident and multiple staff members confirmed that the resident did not refuse showers and expected to receive them at least twice a week. Staff acknowledged that missed showers should be made up the next day and refusals should be documented, but there was no evidence in the progress notes that additional showering opportunities were provided when showers were missed or refused. The regional clinical support staff confirmed that the resident did not receive showers as scheduled and that missed or refused showers should have been documented.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙