Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Revise Care Plan After Fall and Change in Elopement Risk

Bowerston, Ohio Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for a resident following a fall and a change in elopement risk status. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including parkinsonism, dementia with behavioral disturbances, and a history of traumatic brain injury, was assessed as having severely impaired cognition and had experienced a fall with injury. Despite documentation in the medical record indicating the resident was no longer at risk for elopement and had sustained a significant fall resulting in head and elbow injuries, the care plan was not updated to reflect these changes. The care plan continued to list the resident as at risk for wandering and elopement, and no new interventions were added after the fall, even though the resident was moved closer to the nurses' station for observation. Review of facility documentation and interviews revealed that the interdisciplinary team did not meet to review or revise the fall risk care plan after the incident, and the MDS Coordinator had not updated the care plan due to not being aware of the latest assessments. The facility's own policies required that care plans be updated immediately after a fall investigation and that new interventions be communicated to staff, but these steps were not followed. Additionally, the fall investigation documentation lacked post-fall follow-up information and did not include newly added interventions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙