Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
E

Failure to Honor Resident Meal Preferences

Youngstown, Ohio Survey Completed on 04-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor residents' meal preferences as required, affecting nine out of ten residents reviewed for this issue. Record reviews showed that residents had documented dietary preferences, such as not receiving bread or rolls, requesting extra gravy, or wanting gravy on the side. Despite these documented preferences, observations during a lunch meal revealed that several residents did not receive meals according to their stated preferences. For example, some residents received bread or rolls when they should not have, did not receive extra gravy as requested, or received gravy when they had requested none or to have it on the side. These findings were confirmed by staff interviews at the time of meal service. Additionally, interviews with three residents indicated that meal preferences were not consistently honored, and review of the facility's policy confirmed that dietary preferences should be accommodated if requested. The affected residents had a range of medical conditions, including severe cognitive impairment, dementia, depression, diabetes, kidney disease, and dysphagia, with varying levels of assistance required for eating. The deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation and was supported by direct observation, record review, and staff and resident interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙