Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Implement Physician-Ordered Fall Interventions for At-Risk Residents

Gallipolis, Ohio Survey Completed on 04-21-2025

Penalty

Fine: $24,990
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement physician-ordered fall prevention interventions for two residents with known fall risks. For one resident with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and severe cognitive impairment, the care plan and physician orders required specific fall interventions such as non-skid strips to the left side of the bed, non-skid strips in front of the recliner, and dycem to the recliner seat. Observations revealed that these interventions were not in place, and this was confirmed by staff interviews. Another resident, with a history of dementia, seizures, Parkinsonism, and other significant medical conditions, also had physician orders for fall prevention measures. These included dycem to the wheelchair seat, non-skid strips in front of the toilet, and a sign reminding the resident to use the call light. Observations showed that the dycem was missing from the wheelchair, non-skid strips were not present in front of the toilet, and the reminder sign was not visible to the resident. Staff confirmed that these interventions were not implemented as ordered. The facility's policy required that residents be assessed for fall risk and receive care and services according to their risk level. Despite this, the required fall prevention interventions were not consistently provided for residents identified as being at risk for falls, as evidenced by direct observation and staff verification.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙