Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0700
D

Failure to Attempt Alternatives and Document Assessment Prior to Bed Rail Use

Kimball, Nebraska Survey Completed on 04-21-2025

Penalty

Fine: $42,470
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to attempt the use of appropriate alternatives prior to the installation of bed rails for a resident with dementia, epilepsy, and an anxiety disorder who required maximum assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Documentation showed that the resident's Power of Attorney (POA) requested bilateral half-side bed rails to enhance independent bed mobility, and a potential risk of entrapment was identified. However, there was no evidence that alternatives to bed rails were considered or attempted, nor were contraindications to alternatives identified. The facility's policy did not require the use of alternatives prior to bed rail installation, and the required risk-benefit assessment and documentation of attempted alternatives were missing from the resident's records. Further review revealed that the Bed Side Rails Decision Tree was incomplete, lacking the resident's name and documentation of the decision-making pathway. The DON confirmed that no alternatives were considered or attempted before implementing the bed rails, and the POA was not informed of alternatives or the benefits and likelihood of benefits of bed rails. The deficiency was identified through record reviews and interviews, which demonstrated noncompliance with regulatory requirements for assessing and documenting the use of bed rails.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙