Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Include Recurrent UTI Management in Care Plan

Sauk Centre, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident with a significant history of urinary tract infections (UTIs). The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living, had multiple diagnoses including hypertension, renal insufficiency, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and morbid obesity. The resident's medical record documented several episodes of UTIs over a period of months, with corresponding antibiotic and preventive treatments ordered by the physician. Despite this documented history and ongoing risk, the resident's care plan did not include any mention of UTIs, the history of recurrent infections, goals of treatment, or interventions to monitor, prevent, or address UTIs. Interviews with facility staff, including a registered nurse clinical coordinator and the director of nursing, confirmed that the care plan should have included the resident's history of UTIs and related interventions. Both staff members acknowledged the importance of documenting such information to ensure staff awareness and timely response to symptoms. The facility's own policy required comprehensive, person-centered care plans that incorporate measurable objectives, timetables, identified problem areas, and risk factors, none of which were present in the resident's care plan regarding UTIs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙