Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0847
E

Failure to Adequately Explain Arbitration Agreements to Residents

West Branch, Michigan Survey Completed on 04-29-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that binding arbitration agreements were explained in a manner that could be understood by residents or their representatives. Interviews with the nursing home administrator and admissions director confirmed that while the arbitration agreement was presented and residents were told it was not required for admission, several cognitively intact residents who had signed the agreement were unable to explain or recall what the arbitration agreement was. Specifically, three residents with high BIMS scores, indicating cognitive intactness, could not describe or remember the arbitration agreement they signed, and one stated it was not explained to her. Additionally, during a resident council meeting, all six residents in attendance reported not understanding the arbitration process or what the agreement meant. One resident expressed that the volume of information provided during admission made it difficult to remember what was signed, and another cited a lack of trust. The findings indicate that the facility did not adequately ensure residents or their representatives were informed about the arbitration agreement or their right to refuse, resulting in a lack of understanding among those who signed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙