Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Implement and Document Fall Prevention Protocols for High-Risk Residents

Evansville, Indiana Survey Completed on 04-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that two residents at high risk for falls were adequately supervised and protected from accident hazards, as evidenced by repeated failures to follow fall protocols, update care plans, and implement or maintain fall prevention interventions. Both residents had extensive histories of falls, with one resident experiencing 23 falls and the other 34 falls within a year. Despite documented high fall risk and multiple interventions listed in their care plans, there were numerous instances where interventions were not in place, such as call lights not being within reach, lack of non-skid footwear, and absence of required safety equipment like dycem or non-skid strips. Observations also revealed that residents were left unattended in their rooms, contrary to care plan instructions. The clinical records for both residents showed significant gaps in documentation and follow-through after falls. Many falls lacked Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) notes, timely updates to care plans with new interventions, and completion of fall risk assessments. In several cases, there was no evidence that the physician or responsible party was notified after a fall, and some falls were only referenced in 72-hour charting notes without details on the circumstances or follow-up. Additionally, some interventions added to care plans after IDT reviews were not observed to be implemented during surveyor observations. Both residents had complex medical histories, including dementia, muscle weakness, repeated falls, and other comorbidities that increased their vulnerability. Despite these risks, the facility did not consistently anticipate or meet their needs, failed to ensure prompt response to call lights, and did not always provide appropriate supervision or assistance with toileting and transfers. The lack of consistent documentation, communication, and implementation of fall prevention strategies contributed to ongoing falls and injuries for these residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙