Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0801
F

Failure to Employ a Qualified Registered Dietitian

Dublin, Georgia Survey Completed on 04-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to employ a qualified Registered Dietitian (RD) to oversee the food and nutrition service, as required. During the survey, staff interviews and document reviews revealed that the facility had been without an RD for approximately two months. The Dietary Manager confirmed the absence of an RD and stated that she communicated with the MDS nurse regarding residents' diets. However, the MDS Coordinator reported that she did not communicate with the Dietary Manager about residents' diets. The facility was unable to provide a job description for the RD position, and the only documentation available described the Dietary Manager's role as assisting the Dietitian. Further interviews indicated confusion among facility leadership regarding the RD's status. The Administrator initially believed the former RD was still offering support until a replacement was hired, but the former RD clarified that her last day was over two months prior and she was no longer affiliated with the facility. The Administrator was unaware that there was no RD currently serving the facility and could not confirm any interim coverage. The Building Manager, involved in a change of company ownership, was also unaware that the RD's contract had ended. This lack of a qualified RD had the potential to affect the nutritional needs and quality of life for the 56 residents in the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙