Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0803
D

Failure to Provide Complete Meal per Resident's Dietary Needs

West Palm Beach, Florida Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident did not receive all the food items listed on their meal ticket, specifically the protein portion, during a dinner service. The resident, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 and on a regular diet per physician order, received a tray containing mashed potatoes, green peas, and sliced bread, but no protein. The resident reported this to staff and requested an alternative (a peanut butter and jelly sandwich), but did not receive it. The Food Service Manager was unable to provide a clear reason for the omission and confirmed that the meal ticket indicated the resident should have received chicken as the protein. Further investigation revealed that the resident had a known dislike for beef due to difficulty digesting it, but did not have a dislike for pork and typically received fish as a substitute when needed. The Food Service Manager acknowledged familiarity with the resident's dietary preferences but could not explain why the protein was omitted from the meal. The omission was attributed to being overlooked, as confirmed by review of the meal ticket and staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙