Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Two Residents

Reedley, California Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two residents, resulting in inaccurate assessments. For one resident with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a significant change in status MDS was coded to indicate the resident was rarely or never understood. Upon review, the MDS Coordinator acknowledged this was an error and that the resident's cognitive ability had been incorrectly documented. The inaccuracy was not identified until it was brought to the attention of the MDS Coordinator during the survey. For another resident with a history of anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder, the quarterly MDS did not reflect active diagnoses of anxiety or depression, despite these being present in the resident's medical history. The MDS Coordinator confirmed that these diagnoses were omitted from the MDS and subsequently amended the record. Both the DON and Executive Director stated their expectation that the MDS should accurately reflect residents' cognitive status and active diagnoses, but these were not captured at the time of the assessments.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙