Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Failure to Involve Resident in Care Planning Process

Reseda, California Survey Completed on 04-11-2025

Penalty

Fine: $17,34513 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to involve a resident and/or the resident's representative in the quarterly Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Care Conference for the development of an individualized Comprehensive Care Plan. The resident, who had diagnoses including gastroesophageal reflux disease and hypertension, was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living. Despite this, the resident was not included in discussions regarding discharge plans or care goals, and was unaware of his discharge status or plans, expressing frustration about not being consulted. Record review and staff interviews confirmed that the IDT Care Conference notes did not document participation by the resident or the resident's representative, contrary to facility policy which requires such involvement to the extent possible. The facility's policies also specify that care plans should be individualized and developed collaboratively with the resident or their representative. The lack of resident involvement led to the resident's frustration and the potential for unmet physical and psychosocial needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙