Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0644
D

Failure to Refer Resident for PASARR Level II Evaluation

Altus, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 04-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to refer a resident with a newly diagnosed mental illness for a Level II PASARR evaluation. The resident, who had a history of bipolar disorder, was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder. Despite this significant change in diagnosis, there was no evidence that the facility re-evaluated the resident for a PASARR Level II, as required by their policy. The policy mandates that a significant change Level 1 screening should be completed when a resident receives a new mental diagnosis or begins receiving medications for mental illness, followed by a call to the Level of Care Evaluation Unit to determine if a Level 2 screening is necessary. The deficiency was identified during a review of the resident's clinical records and interviews with the facility's administrator. The administrator acknowledged the lack of documentation showing that the OHCA was contacted following the new diagnosis. The facility had undergone a change in ownership, which contributed to the difficulty in determining the previous process for handling such cases. The resident was cognitively intact, as indicated by a BIMS score of 15, and was receiving antipsychotic and antidepressant medications at the time of the assessment.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙