Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Dietary Preferences and Consistency

Las Vegas, Nevada Survey Completed on 04-11-2025

Penalty

Fine: $61,900
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to comply with the prescribed meal consistency and dietary preferences for a resident, leading to a deficiency in honoring the resident's right to self-determination and choice. The resident, who had a history of hypertension, chronic debility, hypothyroidism, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, was observed refusing meals due to incorrect consistency and unwanted food items. Despite a physician's order for a minced and moist texture diet, the resident was repeatedly served a pureed diet, which they had previously been removed from. Additionally, the resident's meal ticket indicated a dislike for pork, yet meals containing ham were served, further disregarding the resident's documented preferences. The kitchen manager confirmed the discrepancy between the prescribed minced/moist diet and the pureed diet being served, acknowledging the misunderstanding by the cook who considered both consistencies the same. The facility's policy on resident food preferences, which mandates awareness of resident preferences and allergies, was not adhered to, resulting in the resident's dissatisfaction and meal refusal. The resident's nutritional care plan highlighted the risk of altered nutrition and hydration due to their medical conditions, emphasizing the importance of adhering to dietary preferences to prevent significant weight changes and ensure adequate nutritional intake.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙