Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0847
D

Failure to Explain Arbitration Agreement to Residents

Belding, Michigan Survey Completed on 04-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to adequately explain the arbitration agreement to two residents, leading to a deficiency in the admission process. Resident #58, a visually impaired female with glaucoma, was not given the opportunity to listen to an audio recording explaining the arbitration process for visually impaired residents. During her admission, she allowed administrative personnel to electronically sign the forms on her behalf, but she did not recall being informed about the arbitration agreement. The staff member responsible for the admission process admitted to not reading every paragraph of the agreement to the resident and was advised by corporate to provide only a brief explanation of the forms. Resident #88, a cognitively intact male with quadriplegia, also experienced a lack of thorough explanation regarding the arbitration agreement. He could not recall the details of the agreement when he signed it and stated that if it had been explained to him more thoroughly, he might have reconsidered signing it. The failure to provide a comprehensive explanation of the arbitration agreement to these residents highlights a deficiency in the facility's admission process.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙