Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
E

Failure to Ensure Call Lights Within Reach for Residents

Belding, Michigan Survey Completed on 04-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that call lights were within reach for five residents who were assessed or care planned for their use. Resident #294, a female with Alzheimer's and other health issues, was observed multiple times with her call light out of reach, despite her care plan specifying the need for an accessible call light to reduce fall risk. Similarly, Resident #32, a male with Alzheimer's and other conditions, was repeatedly observed with his call light out of reach, contrary to his care plan that required personal items and the call light to be within reach. Resident #70, a female with a history of falls and severe cognitive impairment, had no safety interventions involving the call light in her care plan, and her call light was consistently out of reach. Resident #14, a female with dementia and other health issues, was unable to reach her call light, which was wrapped around the bed rail. Resident #9, a female with dementia and anxiety, was observed with her call light out of reach and was unable to locate it. The facility's policy required staff to ensure call lights were within reach during each interaction, but this was not adhered to, as evidenced by the observations and interviews conducted.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙