Failure to Implement Elopement Prevention Plan
Summary
The facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident identified as being at risk for elopement. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering and exit-seeking behaviors, was supposed to be monitored closely and equipped with a wander guard to prevent unsupervised exits. However, on the day of the incident, the wander guard system was not functioning due to a sprinkler system inspection, and staff did not provide the necessary supervision or interventions to prevent the resident from leaving the facility. The resident managed to elope from a locked unit without staff knowledge and traveled approximately 120 feet before tripping and falling in a grassy area outside the facility. The staff were unaware of the resident's absence until alerted by a passerby and a family member of another resident. The investigation revealed that staff were not monitoring the exit doors during the alarm system shutdown, and the care plan's interventions, such as providing diversional activities, were not implemented. Interviews with facility staff indicated a lack of awareness and preparation for the alarm system's temporary shutdown. The staff responsible for the resident's supervision were not informed of the need for additional monitoring during this period, and there was insufficient staffing to ensure the safety of all residents in the locked unit. The facility's failure to implement the care plan and provide adequate supervision constituted Immediate Jeopardy, posing a risk of serious harm to the resident.
Removal Plan
- R2 was assessed for injury and assisted back into the facility with a wheelchair by the DON. A head-to-toe skin assessment was completed with no new injuries noted.
- The Administrator initiated a Code Green, and a head count was performed per the Unit Managers on each unit.
- R2's Physician and Family/Responsible Party were notified of the event, and R2 was sent to the Emergency Department for evaluation and returned with no injuries.
- Upon return from the hospital, R2 had a complete head-to-toe skin assessment with no new areas of concern.
- R2 received 1:1 supervision from facility staff.
- Facility staff were assigned to monitor unlocked doors until the fire system and door locks resumed normal function.
- R2's care plan was reviewed and updated by the Social Services Director and MDS1.
- An elopement risk assessment was repeated for R2 and she was noted at risk for elopement.
- All residents had an elopement risk assessment completed; 16 residents were identified to be at risk for elopement.
- The profile for R2 in the elopement binder was reviewed and R2's Activity assessment was updated.
- A root cause analysis via Fishbone Diagram was completed, and a care plan meeting was held for R2 with the resident's family.
- All residents had their care plans reviewed by the DON, Signature Care Consultant, and/or SSD.
- All doors were checked to ensure locks were functioning by the Plant Operations Assistant.
- All exit door codes were changed.
- Activity assessments were updated for all residents on the Reflections Unit.
- All elopement books were reviewed to ensure resident profiles and pictures were updated and accurate.
- Elopement drills and door checks were completed each shift.
- Door checks were performed weekly ongoing, and elopement drills were performed weekly and then monthly ongoing.
- Additional door alarms not tied to the fire alarm system were placed on the two exterior exit doors on the Reflections Unit.
- Vinyl window frosting was placed on the two exterior exit doors on the Reflections Unit.
- A Hasp lock and a key padlock were placed on one door of the nurse's station.
- Prior to any work affecting safety systems, the Administrator and DON must be notified to ensure staff were assigned to doors for monitoring.
- Current staff received education on various policies and completed a post-test with a requirement of achieving 100% passing score.
- Individual resident activity boxes were located on the Memory Care unit.
- A report was created for monitoring doors when the system was down.
- The DON, Unit Managers, SDC, Medical Records Nurse, or Manager on Duty were required to assist the Reflections Unit during staff breaks.
- A new fence with a keypad was installed outside of the Reflections Unit.
- The Administrator or Activities Director audited documentation of activities and care plans for three random residents at risk for elopement.
- An Ad Hoc Quality Assurance meeting was held to review the investigation and the current plan of corrective action.
- A post-education test was provided to 10 random staff on shifts.
- QA meetings were held daily and weekly, then monthly for recommendations and further follow-up.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
A resident with dementia, muscle weakness, and protein-calorie malnutrition had a care plan directing staff to offload his heels or use Prevalon boots while in bed. During observation, he was found in bed without the boots, and an LPN confirmed his heels were not offloaded even though they should have been.
Failure to care plan depression: A resident with MDD and ongoing depressive symptoms had psychology evaluations documenting depressed mood, loss of interest, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and appetite changes, and the MDS listed depression as an active dx. However, the care plan did not include depression as a focus area, and the MDS Coordinator and DON both stated it should have been care planned.
Incomplete care planning for ordered medications and diabetic footwear. The facility did not include ordered meds such as Eszopiclone, Lexapro, Mirtazapine, and Zolpidem in residents' comprehensive care plans, and one resident was not measured for diabetic shoes and insoles per MD order. The MDS Coordinator said the missing medication care plans were an oversight, while the DON and Administrator stated care plans are used to direct and guide resident care.
A facility failed to include person-centered comprehensive care plan focus areas for two residents receiving ordered meds. One resident with atrial fibrillation was receiving Eliquis, and another resident with insomnia was receiving Trazodone, but neither current care plan addressed the medication use. The MDS Nurse stated she was responsible for care plan development and said the omissions were due to oversight.
Failure to update a resident’s fall care plan with a Geri-chair intervention. A resident with dementia, osteoarthritis, diabetes, severe cognitive impairment, and a history of falls had a care plan listing multiple fall precautions, but after a witnessed fall and a physician order for a Geri-chair or tilt back WC, the care plan was not updated to include that intervention. Surveyors observed the resident in a Geri-chair, and the MDS Coordinator and DON acknowledged the care plan had not been updated.
Failure to care plan a resident’s impaired hearing. A resident with dementia and a history of hard of hearing was observed unable to hear normal conversation and stated he refused to use his hearing aid. The SSD and RN confirmed no care plan had been initiated for the hearing impairment or hearing aid refusal, and the DON stated the condition should have been care planned per facility policy and MDS triggers.
Failure to Offload Heels as Directed
Penalty
Summary
Resident #32, who was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, and protein-calorie malnutrition, had a care plan revised on 6/18/21 directing staff to offload his heels or use Prevalon boots when he was in bed, as he allowed. During observation on 7/9/26 at 11:22 AM, Resident #32 was found in bed without Prevalon boots in place. At 11:23 AM, an LPN stated the resident should have had his boots on, then lifted the blanket and observed the resident's legs resting on a pillow. When asked whether the resident's heels were offloaded, the LPN stated they were not and confirmed they should have been offloaded.
Failure to Care Plan Depression
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident #22, who had diagnoses including Major Depressive Disorder and was documented by psychology evaluations as having recurrent, moderate depression. The resident’s evaluation notes described decreased interest in activities, persistent depressed mood, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and changes in appetite, with symptoms occurring on more than half of the days and causing moderate subjective distress. A later psychology note again documented persistent depressed mood, marked loss of interest, altered sleep patterns, and fatigue with moderate distress. The resident’s quarterly MDS dated 6/13/2026 documented an active diagnosis of depression in Section I, but the care plan did not include a focus area for depression. During interview, the MDS Coordinator stated the resident had been followed by Balance Wellbeing since 12/2025, the diagnosis was entered on 5/20/2026, and depression was not included in the care plan but should be. The DON also stated the resident should be care planned for depression. The facility policy required a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident’s medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs and all services identified in the comprehensive assessment.
Incomplete Care Planning for Ordered Medications and Diabetic Footwear
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes for 3 of 4 residents reviewed. Resident #12 had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, malnutrition, and depression, and her physician orders included Eszopiclone for insomnia, Lexapro for depression, and Mirtazapine for protein-calorie malnutrition. Although these medications were active and administered, the comprehensive care plan dated 04/23/26 did not include care planning for Eszopiclone, Lexapro, or Mirtazapine. Resident #3 had diagnoses including PTSD, depression, and stroke, with a BIMS score of 08 indicating severely impaired cognition. Her physician order dated 06/01/26 included Zolpidem Tartrate 5 mg at bedtime for insomnia, and the MDS indicated she received a hypnotic medication during the look-back period. The comprehensive care plan did not indicate Zolpidem. During interview, the MDS Coordinator stated she reviewed the records and did not see care plans for Resident #12's medications or Resident #3's Zolpidem, and said it was an oversight. Resident #2 was also identified in the deficiency statement as not being measured for diabetic shoes and diabetic insoles per physician order. The facility's policy stated that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timetables is developed and implemented for each resident and revised as conditions change. The DON and Administrator stated that care plans were a team effort and used to direct and guide resident care, and that if care plans were not done properly, care could be missed.
Missing Care Plan Focus Areas for Anticoagulant and Antidepressant Medication Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for a resident receiving anticoagulant medication. Resident #5 was admitted with atrial fibrillation and had a physician order for Eliquis 5 mg by mouth twice daily. The June 2026 MAR showed the resident received Eliquis as ordered, and the quarterly MDS assessment coded the resident as moderately cognitively impaired and receiving anticoagulant medication. However, the resident’s current comprehensive care plan, last reviewed on 6/19/26, did not include a care plan focus area for anticoagulant medication use. The facility also failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for a resident receiving antidepressant medication. Resident #8 was admitted with insomnia and had a physician order for Trazodone 50 mg by mouth at bedtime. The June 2026 MAR showed the resident received Trazodone as ordered, and the quarterly MDS assessment coded the resident as cognitively intact and receiving antidepressant medication. The resident’s current comprehensive care plan, last reviewed on 6/18/26, did not include a care plan focus area for antidepressant medication use. In both cases, the MDS Nurse stated she was responsible for developing the care plans and identified the missing care plan areas as an oversight.
Failure to Update Fall Care Plan With Geri-Chair Intervention
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that included all of Resident #1’s fall interventions. Resident #1, a [AGE]-year-old female with dementia, osteoarthritis, and diabetes mellitus, had a quarterly MDS showing a BIMS score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and was assessed as having falls with one fall without injury. Her comprehensive care plan identified her as being at risk for falls related to debility, advanced age, and behaviors, and included interventions such as a low bed with fall mat, tilt back wheelchair, staff education, correct positioning in chair, nonskid tape under the fall mat, use of a call light, monitoring for changes in condition, and a pommel cushion added to the chair. After Resident #1 experienced a witnessed fall from her wheelchair in the TV area, a physician order was entered for safety devices including a low bed, fall mat, and Geri-chair or tilt back wheelchair. At the time of survey observation, Resident #1 was seen in a Geri-chair in the TV area and stated she liked it and was comfortable in it. However, the care plan did not include the Geri-chair intervention. The MDS Coordinator stated she had seen Resident #1 in the Geri-chair but had not yet updated the care plan, and the DON stated whoever had the resident should have seen the order for the Geri-chair and updated the care plan.
Failure to Care Plan Hearing Impairment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop an individualized, resident-centered care plan with measurable objectives, timeframes, and interventions to address Resident 33’s impaired hearing. Resident 33 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, and abnormal gait and mobility, and the H&P documented a history of hard of hearing. The MDS dated 6/5/2026 indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making and had minimal difficulty hearing. During an observation and interview on 6/29/2026, Resident 33 was lying in bed and stated he could not hear the surveyor during a normal conversation, that he was hard of hearing, and that he refused to use his hearing aid. The SSD stated the resident had difficulty hearing, refused to use the hearing aid, and had no care plan initiated for impaired hearing. RN 2 later confirmed there was no care plan for the resident’s impaired hearing and that one should be in place to address the hearing impairment and refusal to use the hearing aid so staff could communicate effectively. The DON stated that a resident with impaired hearing should be care planned according to facility policy and that hearing impairment triggered on the MDS should be care planned, including refusal to use the hearing aid.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.