Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0695
D

Failure to Provide Required Respiratory Care

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 12-20-2024

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Amoroso Healthcare and Rehabilitation Woodridge was found to be non-compliant with the requirement for providing respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice. The deficiency involved a resident who was admitted to the facility with a need for BiPAP therapy, as indicated in the hospital referral paperwork. The resident, who had chronic kidney disease and diabetes, was admitted to the facility in the evening with a documented need for BiPAP at night and as needed during the day. However, upon admission, the facility did not have a spare BiPAP machine available, and the oxygen supply company could not deliver one until the following day. The situation escalated when the resident requested to be sent back to the hospital if the BiPAP could not be provided for the night, leading to the resident's transfer back to the hospital. During an interview, the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged receiving the referral that mentioned the need for BiPAP but noted that the hospital used Careport for communication, which did not involve verbal communication with the facility. The responsibility for reviewing and approving referrals was shared among the DON, NHA, and Director of Social Services.

Plan Of Correction

1. Resident #5 no longer resides in the facility. 2. An audit will be completed by the Resident Care Navigator or designee of the last 30 days of admissions to determine if residents admitted needed a bipap received one at admission. Corrections will be made as necessary. 3. Education will be provided to the NHA, DON, and Resident Care Navigator regarding the following new process. Referrals will be reviewed by the NHA, DON, Resident Care Navigator or designee to determine if a bipap is needed and the Resident Care Navigator or designee will confirm with the hospital Case Manager the need for a bipap at admission. This information will be discussed at the clinical meeting and arrangements will be made to obtain the needed equipment prior to admission. Equipment needs and settings will be documented in the resident's medical record. 4. A new admission tracker will be kept by the Resident Care Navigator with the information needed to admit a resident with a bipap. This tracker will be reviewed weekly x four by the NHA or designee for accuracy. Results of the tracker review will be reviewed at the monthly Quality Assurance Committee meeting.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙