Failure to Provide Admission Packet Upon Readmission
Summary
The facility failed to inform a resident and their responsible party of the resident's rights and services upon admission. The resident was initially admitted to the facility and later readmitted after a hospital stay. Despite the readmission being considered a new admission, the facility did not provide the admission packet, which includes the resident's rights and responsibilities, until nearly three years later. This delay in providing the necessary documentation was identified during a review of the resident's records. The resident, who was diagnosed with dementia and depression, was admitted back to the facility from a general acute care hospital. The facility's policy required that an admission packet be signed within 48 to 72 hours of admission, but this was not adhered to. The admission packet, which should have been presented at the time of readmission, was only signed by the responsible party almost three years later, indicating a significant lapse in protocol. Interviews with facility staff, including the Admission Coordinator and Director of Nursing, confirmed that the resident's readmission should have been treated as a new admission, necessitating the completion of a new admission packet. However, due to incomplete and missing records, the packet was not presented to the responsible party until much later. This oversight was acknowledged by the facility's staff, highlighting a deficiency in the facility's admission process and record-keeping practices.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
The facility did not review Resident Rights during Resident Council meetings for several months, as confirmed by resident and staff interviews and review of meeting minutes. Multiple residents who attended these meetings were unaware of where to find information about their rights, and the omission was attributed to a change in agenda forms by the Activities Director.
The facility did not provide ongoing communication about resident rights during Resident Council meetings, as confirmed by a review of meeting minutes and interviews with a resident and the Activity Director. This omission had the potential to affect all residents in the facility.
Failure to Review Resident Rights During Resident Council Meetings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were informed of their Resident Rights, as required by policy. Review of Resident Council meeting minutes over an 11-month period showed that Resident Rights were not discussed during these meetings. Interviews with several residents confirmed that they were not aware of where to find information about their rights and that these rights had not been reviewed during Resident Council sessions. The Activities Director acknowledged that Resident Rights were omitted from the meetings due to a change in the agenda forms. Facility policy indicated that Resident Rights should be reviewed during Resident Council meetings, but this was not done, affecting multiple residents who attended these meetings.
Failure to Communicate Resident Rights During Council Meetings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide ongoing communication to residents regarding their rights, as evidenced by a review of Resident Council meeting minutes over a period of several months, which showed no documentation of resident rights being discussed. An interview with a resident confirmed that staff did not review resident rights during Resident Council meetings. Additionally, the Activity Director, who had been conducting the meetings since September 2024, acknowledged that she was not discussing resident rights with residents and only became aware of the requirement to do so in March 2025. This lack of communication regarding resident rights had the potential to affect all residents in the facility, which had a census of 44 at the time of the survey.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
