Failure to Provide Language Assistance Services
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate language assistance services to a resident with limited English proficiency, identified as R182. The facility's policy on Language Assistance Service mandates that individuals with limited English proficiency should have access to language assistance services to ensure meaningful communication regarding their medical conditions and treatment. However, observations and interviews revealed that R182, who speaks Spanish and little to no English, was not provided with the necessary resources to understand communications about his healthcare regimen. The care plan for R182 indicated a need for non-verbal cueing, communication devices, and Spanish-speaking staff, but these interventions were not effectively implemented. During observations, R182 was seen attempting to communicate with staff and his roommate using gestures and pointing, indicating a communication barrier. Staff members were observed trying to communicate with R182 without using any translation services or devices. Interviews with R182, facilitated by a Spanish-speaking surveyor, revealed his frustration with the communication barrier and his lack of understanding regarding his care plan and treatment. He expressed that the admission paperwork was presented in English, which he did not understand, and he relied on the facility to manage his care appropriately. Further interviews with staff, including the Unit Manager, LPN, CNA, Social Worker, and Admission Director, highlighted a lack of awareness and resources for language assistance. The Unit Manager admitted that the dementia care unit did not have a posted language line, and the communication binder was missing. The LPN and CNA were unaware of how to access a language line, and the Social Worker was unfamiliar with R182's communication barriers. The Admission Director confirmed that the admission process was conducted in English and acknowledged the need for a language line in R182's care plan. The Director of Nursing and Regional Nursing Consultant confirmed that staff should use communication assistance when necessary, but this was not consistently practiced.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Staff failed to ensure residents knew where to find contact information for the State Survey Agency and the State LTC Ombudsman. Required lists of names, mailing/email addresses, and phone numbers were posted behind the concierge desk in an area not accessible to residents, and no other signage was present on the unit. During a Resident Council meeting, all residents present were unable to identify the location of this information and were unaware of their right to file complaints with the State or Ombudsman. Later, two residents taken to see the posting stated they had not known it was there, while the concierge reported residents must ask for the information and that none had done so during her tenure.
The facility failed to post required information informing residents how to formally complain to the State Agency. During a resident council meeting, residents reported they did not know how to make a formal complaint to the state, and a subsequent tour showed that the main bulletin board for residents and visitors did not include instructions for filing a complaint with the state agency. The NHA later confirmed the absence of this required complaint information, which was reviewed with the NHA, DON, and a corporate nurse during the survey exit conference.
The facility did not ensure that residents were informed of their right to file a complaint with the State Survey Agency, and failed to provide visible, readable, and accurate contact information. Multiple residents were unaware of where to find this information, and both the AD and DON confirmed that the posted details were not accessible or correct, contrary to facility policy.
The facility did not ensure that residents were informed about how to contact the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman or file complaints with the State Survey Agency. Residents reported not knowing how to access these resources, and required information was missing from admission packets and not discussed during resident council meetings. Staff interviews confirmed that this information was not routinely provided or documented.
Surveyors found that the facility did not have the State Ombudsman contact information posted and accessible for residents and visitors. During a tour with the DON and an administrator, it was confirmed that the information was missing and that there was no facility policy for posting advocacy numbers, potentially affecting all residents.
Four cognitively intact residents, each requiring assistance with ADLs due to various medical conditions, were not provided with written notices or contact information for advocacy groups or instructions on filing complaints with the State Agency. Residents were unaware of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman and reporting procedures, and staff only referenced a poster at the entrance rather than directly informing residents, contrary to facility policy.
Failure to Inform Residents of Location of State and Ombudsman Contact Information
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to ensure that residents were informed of the location of contact information for the State Survey Agency and the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program. During an observation of the third floor, the required list of names, mailing and email addresses, and telephone numbers for the State licensure office and the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was found posted behind the concierge’s desk on the wall, in a location inaccessible to residents. No other signage with this required information was posted on the third floor. At a Resident Council meeting, all 10 residents present were unable to identify where the contact information for the State licensure office and the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was located and were unaware of their right to file a complaint with these entities. After the meeting, the Activities Director escorted two residents to view the Ombudsman information, and both stated they did not know it was posted there. Concierge staff reported that residents must ask for the information and phone numbers if they need them and that no resident had requested this information during the five years she had worked at the facility. The Activities Director reported there was another copy of the information outside her office on the second floor for assisted living residents. Leadership, including the DON, ADON, and Administrator, were later informed of these findings.
Failure to Post Information on How to File State Agency Complaints
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that information on how residents can formally complain to the State Agency was displayed in a format and language residents understood. During a resident council meeting on 9/24/25 at 1:45 PM, all residents in attendance denied knowing how to make a formal complaint to the state of Delaware. Later that day at 2:08 PM, during a tour of the facility to check required postings, the surveyor observed that the first-floor bulletin case, which displayed information for residents and visitors, did not include information on how to make a complaint to the state agency. At 2:27 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (E1) confirmed this finding. On 9/29/25 at 1:25 PM, the same finding regarding the lack of posted information about how to file a complaint with the state agency was reviewed with the NHA (E1), the DON (E2), and the Corporate Nurse (E3) during the exit conference.
Failure to Provide Accessible and Accurate State Survey Agency Contact Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were properly informed of their right to file a complaint with the State Survey Agency, and did not provide visible, readable, and accurate contact information for the agency. During a Resident Council meeting, four out of five residents stated they did not know where the State Survey Agency contact information was posted and had not been made aware of where to find it. Observations confirmed that the required contact information was either missing or posted in a manner that was not easily readable, with incorrect address and telephone number details. The Activity Director acknowledged that the information was not accessible or accurate, and that it should have been provided during monthly council meetings. Further observation with the DON confirmed that the posted contact information was not visible, easily readable, or up to date, and that the residents' right to file a complaint with the State was not honored. Review of the facility's policy and procedure indicated that residents are to be informed about their rights, including the right to communicate with outside agencies. The deficiency was identified through direct observation, resident interviews, and review of facility policy.
Failure to Provide Residents with Advocacy and Complaint Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents received information and contact details for State and local advocacy organizations, including the State Survey Agency and the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program, in a language and format they understood. Record review of monthly resident council minutes for the past six months showed no documentation of discussions regarding how to file a complaint with the state agency or review of ombudsman information. During a confidential group meeting, all seven residents present stated they did not know how to contact the ombudsman or file a complaint with the state agency, although they recalled being given a brief overview of the program and the ombudsman's name. The facility's admission packet was found to lack the required grievance procedure section and did not include state agency or ombudsman contact numbers. Interviews with the Administrator and Activities Director revealed that while residents were told they could file grievances with facility staff, information about filing complaints directly with the state or contacting the ombudsman was not routinely provided or documented. The Administrator stated that state and ombudsman information was only given if specifically requested by residents or families, and the Activities Director confirmed that the process for contacting the state agency was not explained or documented during resident council meetings. Although ombudsman information was posted at the facility entrance, residents were not consistently informed about their rights or the procedures for filing complaints with external agencies.
Ombudsman Contact Information Not Posted
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the name and contact information for the State Long Term Care Ombudsman was posted and readily available for residents and visitors. During a tour of the skilled areas and nursing home units, surveyors observed that the required Ombudsman information was not posted. The Director of Nursing and an administrator confirmed during the tour that the information was not available and acknowledged it should have been accessible to residents. Additionally, the administrator stated in an interview that the facility did not have a policy regarding the posting of resident advocacy numbers, although they followed state guidelines for such postings. This deficiency had the potential to affect all 57 residents in the facility.
Failure to Provide Required Notices and Advocacy Contact Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide required written notices and contact information for advocacy groups and instructions on how to file a complaint with the State Agency to four residents who were reviewed for these requirements. All four residents had intact cognition and required varying levels of assistance with activities of daily living due to diagnoses such as heart failure, depression, chronic pain, anxiety, spina bifida, and muscle weakness. Despite the facility's policy stating that residents would be given a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers for pertinent regulatory agencies and advocacy groups, these residents were not aware of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman or how to contact the State Agency. During interviews, two residents stated they did not know what a Long-Term Care Ombudsman was or how to contact one, and all four residents indicated they did not know how or why to contact the State Agency. Staff interviews revealed that residents were only reminded of a poster with the required information at the main entrance, and staff were not actively informing residents about the Ombudsman or reporting procedures. The administrator acknowledged that the facility had not fully met regulatory requirements regarding resident notices and contact information.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
