Deficiencies in Nutrition Assessment and Communication
Summary
The Registered Dietitian (RD) at the facility failed to implement current standards of practice in nutrition assessments, particularly for elderly residents classified as obese. The RD used an adjusted body weight method to assess the nutritional needs of Resident 53, who was obese, without considering the resident's actual body weight or discussing weight goals and preferences with the resident or responsible party. This approach contradicted the resident's nutrition plan of care aimed at weight maintenance and had the potential to promote unplanned weight loss. The RD acknowledged that this was her usual practice for residents who were 150% of their ideal body weight, despite professional standards recommending the use of actual body weight for such assessments. The RD also demonstrated a lack of awareness regarding the appropriate nutritional assessment for unstageable pressure injuries. Resident 28, who had an unstageable pressure injury, was assessed using the same criteria as for a Stage 1 pressure injury, rather than the more intensive nutritional needs required for Stage 3 or 4 injuries. This oversight could delay accurate nutrition assessments and timely interventions necessary for wound healing. The facility's policies and procedures lacked adequate directives to ensure nutrition assessments were performed according to professional standards, contributing to the RD's misunderstanding of the requirements for unstageable pressure injuries. Additionally, the RD failed to communicate effectively with the RD at the dialysis center regarding Resident 40's diet order. Resident 40, who had moderate dementia and attended a dialysis center, was not on a renal diet due to personal preference, but this information was not shared with the dialysis center's RD. This lack of communication hindered the coordination of care and could lead to inconsistencies in the resident's dietary management. The facility's policy on dialysis management emphasized the importance of communication between the facility and the dialysis provider, which was not adhered to in this case.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.