Failure to Implement Effective Falls Quality Improvement Project
Summary
The facility failed to develop, implement, monitor, and evaluate a falls quality improvement project (QIP) despite identifying falls as a problem-prone area. This deficiency was highlighted by the lack of comprehensive causal analysis for 29 fall incidents involving three residents over a period of time. Two residents suffered significant injuries due to falls, with one sustaining a hand fracture and facial lacerations, and another requiring sutures for a laceration above the eye. The facility's quality assurance activities did not include action plans to address these issues, and there was no evidence of completed audits or evaluations of the implemented interventions. The facility's quality assurance documentation revealed that although falls were identified as a problem area, there were no action plans for several months, and the only action plan created was incomplete. The documentation also showed that the facility's quality measures for falls were below the 75th percentile, yet there was no detailed analysis or action plan to address the increasing number of falls. The administrator confirmed that the quality committee met monthly, but the only action plan for falls was implemented late and lacked a comprehensive activity plan. Interviews with the facility's administrator and medical director further highlighted the deficiencies. The administrator admitted to receiving only slides without supporting records or audits, and the medical director, who was new to the facility, was unaware of the lack of action plans for the falls QIP. The medical director also noted that the fall policy was not being implemented correctly, and there was limited documentation in interdisciplinary meeting minutes regarding falls. This lack of comprehensive assessment and intervention contributed to the facility's failure to prevent and reduce the risk of falls with major injuries.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.