Failure in QAPI Committee's Review of Abuse Allegation
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee adequately reviewed and analyzed an allegation of abuse involving a resident, identified as RI #398. The committee did not identify physical abuse against the resident nor address concerns related to the identification, reporting, investigation, and protection regarding the allegation of physical abuse reported to the State Agency. This failure was determined to have caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents, leading to an Immediate Jeopardy citation. The deficiency was highlighted during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), who explained that abuse was not consistently discussed in QAPI meetings unless an issue had occurred. The DON revealed that the Administrator (ADM) made the decision on whether to substantiate the abuse allegation without full agreement from the QAPI members. The incident involving RI #398, where a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reportedly grabbed the resident's arm, was reviewed, but the ADM decided not to substantiate the allegation despite evidence suggesting abuse had occurred. Further interviews revealed that the ADM, responsible for managing daily operations and ensuring adherence to policies, did not communicate abuse allegations to the Governing Body as required. The facility's policy mandated a review of all reported abuse allegations through the QAPI process, which included assessing interventions and the effectiveness of investigations. However, this process was not followed, leading to the deficiency being cited as a result of the investigation of a Facility Reported Incident.
Removal Plan
- A QAPI meeting was held which included a review of reportables.
- The Market Clinical Advisor and Market Clinical Lead reviewed allegations of Abuse and the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee meeting minutes to ensure allegations of abuse were analyzed.
- The Market President educated the Nursing Home Administrator on the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement process to include systematic identification, reporting, investigation, analysis, and prevention of abuse or allegations of abuse.
- The Market President and Market Clinical Advisor educated the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee on the Abuse Prohibition policy and procedure.
- Education included emphasizing the importance of analyzing as a team the reportable events of the Center.
- Governing body to include Market President, Market Clinical Advisor, Clinical Lead, Nursing Home Administrator, and Director of Nursing reviewed the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement process.
- The Center QAPI Committee met to discuss staff on resident incidents after the incident occurring.
- Accused CNA no longer works at Merry [NAME] Lodge, her last day of work at the Center.
- 47 residents were interviewed regarding rough treatment from staff and 42 residents skin assessments were completed for any signs of abuse, none were noted.
- 110 staff members were re-educated regarding Abuse Prohibition Policy.
- Administrator was educated regarding conducting thorough investigations and protecting residents during the investigation.
- Administrator was also instructed to review all reportable events with Market Clinical Lead prior to finalizing investigation protocols.
- QAPI committee was educated regarding thoroughly reviewing all reportable events during the QAPI process.
- The Center QAPI Committee reviewed the remaining incidents that were previously unverified/unsubstantiated.
- The review determined the appropriate corrective action had been implemented for 8 incidents, despite being initially unverified/unsubstantiated.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.