Failure to Conduct Monthly State Adverse Actions Checks for CNAs
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that monthly State Adverse Actions Website checks were completed for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) S23CNA, S24CNA, and S25CNA. Review of the personnel files revealed that S23CNA was hired on 12/08/2023, S24CNA on 08/28/2023, and S25CNA on 02/05/2024. However, the first documented State Adverse Actions check for all three CNAs was on 05/03/2024, with no prior monthly checks recorded. An interview with the S1Administrator confirmed the absence of documentation for the required monthly checks before 05/03/2024, and it was noted that the Human Resource Coordinator responsible for these checks was unavailable during the week of the interview.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
See other F0729 citations
Surveyors found that the facility failed to obtain and document an updated CNA registry verification before re-hiring a CNA who had previously been terminated. Review of the CNA’s personnel file showed an original registry check from the initial hire but no verification completed at the time of re-hire, and the administrator confirmed that no such documentation existed.
The facility failed to verify that an agency nurse aide had an active status on the Minnesota Nursing Assistant Registry before assigning her to a 7.5-hour day shift on a floor caring for multiple residents. The aide reported it was her first shift at the facility, and a registry search later showed her status had been inactive for over a year. The DON stated she relied on the staffing agency to send only registry-listed staff and acknowledged the facility did not verify active status for agency personnel, and the administrator confirmed that their process did not include checking current certification of agency aides. A requested facility policy related to this verification process was not provided.
A CNA worked an overnight 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. shift without an active CNA certification, in violation of federal nurse aide registry requirements and the facility’s job description requiring a valid CNA license. The DON had a personnel file printout indicating the CNA’s status was active and employable, but a concurrent CDPH registry search showed no matching data. Review of assignment and attendance sheets confirmed the CNA worked the shift after being called in by a Charge Nurse who did not realize the CNA had been removed from the schedule for lapsed certification. The DSD reported that CNAs with expired certifications are taken off the schedule and payroll and that this CNA had been informed of her limitations, yet she still worked the shift without valid certification.
The facility failed to ensure CMAs had current advanced gastrostomy certifications while administering medications via PEG tubes. A resident’s MARs over several months showed that three CMAs with expired or undocumented gastrostomy credentials repeatedly gave medications through a PEG tube. One CMA reported believing they were allowed to pass PEG tube meds and perform feedings, while the DON later stated that two CMAs supposedly had certifications that were not reflected in the nurse aide registry, and no documentation was produced to verify those credentials.
The facility failed to ensure that a CNA providing personal care was properly certified with the State of Ohio. A staff member originally hired as a housekeeper completed an online NATCEP but never took the state certification exam, and there was no CNA license listed for this individual on the Ohio Nurse Aide Registry. Despite this, the staff member worked multiple 12-hour shifts providing direct care. The DON and HR later acknowledged they were unaware the state test had not been completed and that required follow-up on certification status did not occur, affecting all residents in the facility.
The facility failed to verify the identity and CNA licensure of a registry staff member, allowing an unverified male individual to work a CNA shift under a female CNA’s name. The DSD/IP oriented this individual and had another CNA provide a brief resident-care orientation without checking a government ID, CNA license, or competency evaluation. The facility relied solely on the registry company to confirm identity and licensure and did not maintain personnel files or conduct its own verification for registry staff, resulting in an unidentified person providing direct care under another CNA’s credentials.
Failure to Obtain CNA Registry Verification Prior to Re-Hire
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) registry verification was obtained prior to the re-hire of one CNA. Record review showed that this CNA had an initial hire date of 10/22/2012, a termination date of 04/19/2018, and a re-hire date of 10/10/2018. The personnel file contained a CNA registry verification dated 10/22/2012, corresponding to the original hire, but there was no documented evidence that a new CNA registry verification was obtained at the time of re-hire. During an interview on 03/18/2026 at 11:50 a.m., the administrator confirmed that the facility did not have documentation showing that a CNA registry verification was completed prior to re-hiring this CNA as required. This deficiency was identified for 1 of 2 CNA personnel records reviewed, specifically for the CNA who had a break in employment and was subsequently re-hired without updated registry verification documentation in the personnel record.
Failure to Verify Active Nurse Aide Registry Status for Agency Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a nurse aide had a current competency evaluation on the Minnesota Nursing Assistant Registry before allowing her to work, affecting 1 of 1 nurse aides reviewed for registry verification and potentially all 71 residents. On 3/12/26 at 11:46 a.m., a nursing assistant (NA-A) reported it was her first shift at the facility, and the facility schedule for that date showed she was assigned to work a 7.5-hour day shift on the third floor, where 26 residents resided, with a total facility census of 71 residents. A Minnesota Nurse Aide Registry search, dated 3/13/26 at 11:45 a.m. and provided by the facility, showed NA-A’s registry status as inactive since 12/7/24. During interviews, the DON stated she trusted the staffing agency to send only staff who were on the registry and acknowledged the facility did not verify active status for agency staff, and the administrator confirmed that their process did not include verifying current certification of agency aides and that she expected only currently certified NAs would be sent. A facility policy related to this process was requested by surveyors but was not provided.
CNA Allowed to Work Overnight Shift Without Active Certification
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that one CNA worked an overnight 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. shift without an active CNA certification, contrary to federal nurse aide registry requirements and the facility’s own job description, which requires a valid CNA certification. During interview and record review with the DON, the CNA’s Licensing & Certification Verification Detail Page in the personnel file showed an active, employable status with a future expiration date, which the DON had relied upon. However, when the DON searched the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) website during the same review, no data was found for the CNA, confirming that the CNA did not have an active certification on the registry at the time she worked the shift. Further review of the nursing assignment and attendance sign‑in sheets for the overnight shift confirmed that the CNA had signed in and worked that shift. The DON stated that the situation occurred because the evening shift Charge Nurse, attempting to cover a CNA call‑off, contacted this CNA, who was known for helping cover shifts, and did not recognize that she had been removed from the schedule due to lapsed certification. In a separate telephone interview, the DSD explained that CNAs with lapsed certifications are removed from the monthly schedule and payroll until their certification is valid, and that this CNA had been informed of what she could and could not do with an expired certification. The DSD also noted that the CNA should have known her status when the system would not allow her to clock in, yet she knowingly worked the shift without a valid CNA certification.
Expired and Unverified CMA Gastrostomy Certifications During PEG Tube Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Certified Medication Aides (CMAs) held current advanced gastrostomy certifications before administering medications via gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. Record review showed that CMA #1’s advanced gastrostomy certification had expired, yet the October 2025 MAR for Resident #1 documented that CMA #1 administered medications through the resident’s PEG tube on multiple dates. The facility’s undated Medication Administration policy stated that medications are to be administered by licensed nurses or other staff legally authorized to do so in the state, in accordance with professional standards of practice. The DON identified that 24 residents in the facility received medications through PEG tubes. Further review revealed that CMA #2 and CMA #3 also lacked documented, current advanced gastrostomy certifications while administering PEG tube medications. CMA #2’s certification had expired, but October and November 2025 MARs for Resident #1 showed that CMA #2 administered medications through the PEG tube on several dates, and CMA #2 stated they were allowed to pass medications and perform feedings via PEG tube. CMA #3’s advanced gastrostomy certification was also not current, yet October, November, and December 2025 MARs for Resident #1 documented multiple instances of PEG tube medication administration by CMA #3. The DON initially stated that CMA #1 was the only CMA not certified to work the medication carts and later reported that CMA #2 and CMA #3 did have certifications, but they were not in the nurse aide registry and would be verified with the testing school. However, the facility did not provide documentation confirming current gastrostomy certification for CMA #2 and CMA #3 by the time of the survey.
Unlicensed CNA Allowed to Provide Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that employed CNAs were properly certified with the State of Ohio, as required by facility policy and state regulations. Personnel record review showed that CNA #13 was originally hired as a housekeeper and later completed an online Nurse Aide Competency Evaluation Program (NATCEP), but there was no evidence she had obtained state certification. Timecard review for February 2026 showed CNA #13 worked multiple 12-hour shifts providing care. Review of the Ohio Nurse Aide Registry confirmed there was no current or expired CNA license for CNA #13. The facility’s policy on required training and certification stated that nurse aides must have successfully completed a state-approved NATCEP and either be awaiting certification results or be enrolled in a state-approved NATCEP within the first four months of employment, with certification to be verified through the state registry. Interviews further confirmed that CNA #13 was not licensed and was nonetheless providing personal care to residents. The DON acknowledged that CNA #13 had completed an online CNA program but never took the state test for licensure and verified that she was not licensed as a CNA. CNA #13 herself confirmed she was not licensed, was providing personal care, and reported that her scheduled state test had been cancelled during a government shutdown, and that the DON and Human Resources were not aware she had not completed the state test. Human Resources staff confirmed CNA #13 was not licensed and stated they failed to follow up after her test was cancelled. The facility census at the time was 65 residents, and the failure to ensure proper CNA licensure had the ability to affect all residents.
Unverified Registry CNA Worked Under Another Individual’s Identity
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that an individual working as a CNA held a valid and up-to-date license and met competency evaluation requirements for training. A complaint forwarded to CDPH indicated that a CNA from a registry was scheduled for an afternoon shift, but a male individual arrived and claimed to be that CNA, even though the actual CNA was a female. The male individual signed the staffing assignment sheet, received facility orientation from the DSD/IP, and then received a brief resident-care orientation from another CNA. The DSD/IP did not check or verify the individual’s identity using a government-issued ID or confirm the CNA license prior to or at the start of the shift. Interviews with the DSD/IP, DON, and Administrator revealed that the DSD/IP was responsible for verifying employees’ identity and licenses, conducting background checks, and providing orientations, but she did not verify the identity, license, certification, or competency evaluations of this individual or any registry staff prior to the incident. The Administrator stated that the facility relied on the registry company to verify identity and licensure and did not require its own verification of registry staff. The DSD/IP acknowledged she did not know whether the male individual who worked the shift had a valid CNA license or competency evaluation and that, prior to this event, the facility did not maintain personnel files or conduct identity and license checks for registry staff. The facility’s failure to verify the identity and licensure of the individual resulted in an unverified, potentially unlicensed person working under another CNA’s name and providing direct care to residents, with the DSD/IP later learning from the actual CNA that she had not accepted or worked the shift.
Know what gets cited — and walk into your next survey with full visibility
We process and analyze inspection reports and Plans of Correction using AI to surface insights and trends — so you can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risk before your next survey.
Get ready for your next survey
See what surveyors are citing in your state and spot your risk areas before they do.
Have you been cited for this tag?
Save hours drafting a compliant Plan of Correction — AI built on real approved POCs.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.



