Failure to Provide Thirty-Day Notices of Involuntary Discharge
Summary
The facility failed to provide thirty-day notices of involuntary discharge for three residents who were discharged and did not return. Resident #4, diagnosed with dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, depression, brief psychotic disorder, insomnia, and schizophrenia, was sent to the hospital due to low hemoglobin and hematocrit levels. There was no documentation of where the resident was discharged to, and no thirty-day notice of discharge was provided. Similarly, Resident #5, diagnosed with hyperlipidemia, depression, end-stage renal disease, and anxiety, was sent to the hospital after expressing difficulty breathing. The resident did not return to the facility, and no thirty-day notice of discharge was documented. Resident #6, diagnosed with schizophrenia, depression, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, also had an unplanned discharge with no documentation of where the resident was discharged to and no thirty-day notice provided. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Nursing (DON), MDS Coordinator, Social Service Director, and Business Office Manager, revealed that the facility did not provide the required thirty-day notices of discharge for these residents. The DON stated that the facility decided not to accept Residents #4 and #5 back from the hospital, and there was no additional documentation on their discharges. The Business Office Manager confirmed that the residents were sent out without the intention of taking them back and that no thirty-day notices were issued. The Social Service Director and MDS Coordinator also confirmed the lack of documentation for the required notices. The hospital case manager and a licensed therapist further corroborated that the facility did not intend to take the residents back and did not provide the necessary discharge notices. The case manager mentioned that the DON had informed them that the facility had the prerogative not to accept the residents back. The licensed therapist stated that Resident #6 was brought to their facility without prior consultation and that the facility did not want to take the resident back. The administrator acknowledged that Resident #5 would be a liability if returned and admitted there was no documentation of the discharge or the thirty-day notice for any of the residents.
Penalty
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.



