Failure to Revise Care Plan Leads to Resident Elopement
Summary
The facility failed to revise the care plan for a severely cognitively impaired resident who eloped from the facility. The resident, who had a history of epilepsy and dependence on a wheelchair, was found approximately eight-tenths of a mile from the facility by police after being away for 81 minutes. The resident's care plan, last revised on 11/02/23, did not reflect his inability to go on leave of absence (LOA) unsupervised despite a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was no longer allowed to go out unsupervised due to his confusion, but this change was not updated in the care plan until after the elopement incident on 3/31/24. On the day of the incident, an agency LPN opened the door for the resident, mistakenly believing he was going to sit on the front porch. The resident exited the facility at 7:25 PM and was later found by police. The facility's Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator were notified, and the resident was picked up and returned to the facility. Upon return, the resident was assessed with no injuries noted, and a wander guard bracelet was placed on his wrist. However, the failure to update the care plan in a timely manner directly contributed to the resident's unsupervised exit. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the Social Worker (SW) confirmed that the resident's BIMS score had been below 12 since 2/22/24, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Despite this, the care plan was not updated to reflect the resident's need for supervision during LOA. The SW acknowledged that the care plan should have been revised when the resident's BIMS score fell below 12, but it was not updated until after the elopement incident. The Interim DON also agreed that the care plan should have been updated at the time the resident was determined to be unsafe to go LOA unsupervised.
Removal Plan
- The interim Director of Nursing (DON) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 conducted a head-to-toe body assessment on Resident #1 to review for any skin abnormalities or concerns. Resident #1 had no negative skin issues or concerns.
- The Interim DON oversaw verification of all residents in facility using census with only one resident out of the facility and currently in the hospital. The census in the facility was 140.
- Staff present in the facility during the time of Resident #1 exit received immediate in-service by the Interim DON and Administrator on the procedures with residents signing out to exit facility to include verification of BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status).
- The Interim DON and Administrator initiated servicing with all staff present on Abuse, Neglect, Resident Rights, Vulnerable Adult, and Wandering. Staff Development will continue In-Servicing. No staff will be allowed to return to work without completing.
- Resident #1 wandering evaluation was reviewed by Interim Director of Nursing and indicated low risk for wandering. Resident #1 wandering evaluation was updated by the Interim DON and Administrator.
- The wander guard bracelet was verified to work properly by checking function with door alarm by Administrator, and then placed on Resident #1's left wrist.
- The facility camera was reviewed by the Administrator to determine the timeline of events leading up to Resident #1 exit of facility.
- The Administrator interviewed staff present of Resident #1 leaving the facility unattended. The agency LPN who held the door open stated that she was not aware he could not leave the facility.
- The Mississippi State Department of Health was notified of Resident #1 elopement.
- The Nurse Practitioner (NP) was notified by the Administrator of Resident #1 elopement and return to facility.
- Licensed nurses were notified to perform acute charting on Resident #1 every shift for the next 72 hours to review resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs.
- The LPN #1 initiated facility-based incident reporting on Resident #1.
- The Corporate Clinical Specialist (CCS) initiated an audit of the wander risk evaluations on all 140 active residents. Results indicated twelve (12) residents requiring updates to the wander system. All updates were corrected.
- The Social Services Director updated the wander and elopement binders to ensure all are reflective of results.
- The Maintenance Supervisor checked all wander guards to verify all were in correct working order with no issues found.
- The NP placed orders for Resident to obtain Urinalysis, Comprehensive Metabolic Panel, and Complete Blood Count.
- The Administrator performed an elopement drill to review and educate day shift on policies and procedures on elopement.
- Social Services completed a BIMS on Resident #1 which resulted in moderate cognitive impairment of a 9.
- A Quality Assurance Committee Meeting was held with the Medical Director, Administrator, Assistant Administrator, Interim Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist, and the Assistant Director of Nursing to discuss Resident #1 elopement along with plan of correction.
- Resident #1 was assessed by the NP no issues found and care plan was updated by interdisciplinary team to reflect changes in leave of absence status.
- The Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 performed an elopement drill to review and educate night shift on policies and procedures on elopement.
- The Interim DON and Administrator Assistant performed an elopement Drill and educated staff on day shift.
- The Administrator Assistant developed an orientation binder for all agency staff onboard to be in-serviced on facilities policies and procedures to include wandering, elopement, where to find if a resident is allowed to out leave of absence, and appointment guidelines.
- NP reviewed results of labs ordered and placed an order for Levaquin 750 milligrams one by mouth at bedtime for 7 days related to Urinary Tract Infection to start.
- A current BIMS list will be in the leave of absence binder updated weekly or as needed by Social Services. All residents with BIMS under 12 will not be allowed to leave the facility without supervision.
- The final letter of investigation was sent to the Mississippi State Department of Health.
- The Attorney General was notified regarding the results of the Investigation.
- The Administrator performed an elopement drill to review and educate evening shift on policies and procedures on elopement.
- The Interim DON contacted Resident #2 general surgeon office to confirm phone for communication that is currently in their file and provide the facility contact information for any further communication.
- Resident Council Meeting was held with the Activity Director, Assistant Activity Director #1, Assistant Activity Director #2, and Resident Council President, and eighty-two (82) total resident presents to inform them the facility IJs.
- An in-service was initiated by Staff Development Coordinator on leave of absence process and how to locate residents BIMS. No staff will be allowed to return to work without signing.
- The Administrator held a one-to-one in-service with the Licensed Social Worker on Leave of Absences Care plans to include who can exit facility, supervision needed and process for a change in BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status).
- Medical Director, Administrator, Assistant Administrator, Interim Director of Nursing/ Infection Preventionist, and Assistant Director of Nursing held a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Meeting to include notification of Immediate Jeopardy to review steps initiated to prevent any further reoccurrence to include audits on elopements, care plans, orientation binder, in-services on appointment process, audits of dialysis residents and contacting dialysis to verify appointments.
- Regional Case Mix conducted in-service with Minimum Data Set (MDS) to include implementation, Reviewing, Revising, and Resolving person-centered care plans.
- An audit was initiated by Social Services Director on leave of absence care plans to ensure resident with impaired cognition receive adequate supervision.
- The Assistant Administrator conducted a one-to-one in-service with Front Desk Receptionist to discuss appointment log, resident leave of absence binder, and how to locate current BIMS for residents.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Care plan omissions were identified for two residents. One resident’s care plan did not include multiple documented diagnoses, including UTI, bleeding hemorrhoids, TBI, pneumonia, CKD, and diverticulitis, despite severe cognitive impairment. Another resident’s care plan did not include a physician order for biannual valproic acid level testing and monitoring for side effects, and the DON and MDS Coordinator stated these items should have been included.
Missed Quarterly Care Conference and Resident Participation: A resident who was cognitively intact and had HTN, arthritis, and schizophrenia did not have documented routine care conferences at the expected quarterly interval. The EMR showed care conferences were documented, but there was no evidence of one between two documented meetings, and the resident stated she had not been invited to any care meetings over the past year. The LSW and Admin both confirmed the lack of documentation and stated residents should be included when able.
A resident with cerebral palsy and depressive disorder had conflicting code status documentation in the medical record: the emergency care document showed full code, while the care plan listed DNR and no CPR. The DON stated the care plan was completed in error and should have been revised but had not been.
Missed Care Conference Participation: A resident with intact cognition was not given the opportunity to attend and participate in a care conference. Staff confirmed care conferences were expected after MDS assessments and significant changes, but the resident’s record showed no conference documented for several months, and the family member reported the last conference had been months earlier.
A resident with dementia, bipolar disorder, and HF was on hospice status, but the care plan did not identify the terminal illness as a focus area or include hospice/end-of-life interventions. The care plan only referenced hospice in limited areas such as ADL care, psychosocial support, activities, and anti-anxiety medication related to end of life. The DNS acknowledged the care plan was not revised to reflect the resident’s hospice status.
Care plans were not updated to reflect changed resident conditions, preferences, and interventions. One resident's plan still showed hospice and wound-based EBP after hospice ended and the wound healed, another still listed Influenza A after the illness had resolved, and a third did not include behavior interventions such as a door chime and bookshelf sticker or updated dining preferences. Two residents with family-requested cameras also had care plans that omitted the camera use, rationale, and related monitoring details.
Care Plan Omissions for Resident Diagnoses and Valproic Acid Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 2 of 32 residents reviewed. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including frequent urinary tract infections, bleeding hemorrhoids, traumatic brain injury, pneumonia, chronic kidney disease, and diverticulitis, and the quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident’s care plan, revised 03/05/2026, did not include those diagnoses even though they were part of the resident’s documented medical history. Resident #8 was admitted with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and heart failure, and the quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident’s order summary included a physician order dated 01/23/2025 for valproic acid level testing every 6 months in October and April, but the care plan, revised 05/14/2026, did not include that order. During interviews, the DON and MDS Coordinator stated that both residents’ omitted diagnoses and the valproic acid monitoring order should have been included in the care plans, and the MDS Coordinator identified the omission as an oversight.
Missed Quarterly Care Conference and Resident Participation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide routine care conferences to allow resident participation for one resident who was reviewed for care conferences. The resident’s quarterly MDS assessment indicated admission to the facility, cognitive intactness, and diagnoses of high blood pressure, arthritis, and schizophrenia. The resident’s EMR showed care conferences were documented on 5/2/25, 10/7/25, 12/30/25, and 3/28/26, but there was no evidence of a care conference between 5/2/25 and 10/7/25. During interview, the resident stated she understood what care conferences were but had not been invited to any type of care meeting over the past year. The LSW stated care conferences should occur at admission, then every three months and/or with a significant change of condition, and that she was responsible for scheduling and documenting them in the EMR. The LSW could not provide documentation of a care conference between 5/2/25 and 10/7/25 and stated, "If it isn't documented it didn't happen." The Administrator confirmed care conferences were expected quarterly and should include residents if able or their representative, and also confirmed there was no documentation of a care conference for the resident during that interval. The facility policy stated residents and their designated responsible party are invited to attend the initial care planning conference and sequential conferences, including annual and significant change conferences.
Care Plan Not Updated to Match Current Code Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident’s care plan was revised to reflect the resident’s current code status. The facility’s Care Plan policy stated that care plans would be reviewed quarterly, annually, and with a change of status to ensure they remained current. Resident #4 was admitted with multiple diagnoses including cerebral palsy and depressive disorder. The resident’s medical record contained a Plan for Emergency Care and Intensity of Treatment document showing full code status, while the resident’s care plan documented DNR status and no CPR. The DON stated that the care plan had been completed in error and should have been revised but had not been.
Missed Care Conference Participation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide R10 the opportunity to attend and participate in a care conference. R10’s quarterly MDS assessment dated 5/25/26 identified intact cognition and no hallucinations, delusions, rejection of care, or behaviors. During an interview on 6/1/26, R10 stated she had not had a care conference recently and said the last one was more than 3 months ago. Review of the record showed R10’s last documented Social Service Conference was on 1/16/26, and progress notes from 1/30/26 through 6/3/26 did not show any care conference held or scheduled. Staff interviews confirmed care conferences were expected to occur quarterly, after significant changes, and following MDS assessments, but R10’s quarterly and significant change MDS assessments were not followed by a documented conference. R10’s family member stated they typically attended care conferences, and the social services staff later verified that R10’s care conference had been missed and was only scheduled after the surveyor’s inquiry.
Care Plan Not Revised to Reflect Hospice Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise a resident’s care plan to reflect hospice status and terminal illness for one sampled resident. The resident had diagnoses including dementia, bipolar disorder, and heart failure, and the 8/14/25 Significant Change MDS indicated hospice status. Review of the care plan showed hospice-related references for ADL care, psychosocial well-being, activities, and anti-anxiety medication related to end of life, but it did not identify the resident’s terminal illness as a focus area with interventions including hospice services or other end-of-life interventions. On 6/4/26, the DNS stated the expectation was for a terminal illness to be captured with interventions including hospice services on the care plan, and acknowledged the care plan was not revised to reflect the resident’s terminal illness and hospice status.
Care plans not revised for changed conditions, behaviors, and electronic monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise comprehensive care plans to reflect significant changes in resident status, conditions, preferences, and interventions for three residents reviewed for care plan revision. One resident had a discharge return anticipated MDS showing moderate cognitive impairment, multiple diagnoses including cancer, septicemia, and non-Alzheimer's dementia, and hospice services. The resident's EHR showed hospice services were discontinued, but the care plan continued to identify the resident as receiving hospice care. The same resident's care plan also continued to state that Enhanced Barrier Precautions were required due to a wound, even though the wound had healed and the resident remained on EBP because of a urinary catheter. Another resident's comprehensive MDS identified moderate cognitive impairment, diabetes, CVA, and use of insulin, an anticoagulant, and an antidepressant. The resident's care plan still listed Influenza A as an active respiratory infection with an initiation date from the prior year, but the EHR did not identify ongoing signs, symptoms, treatment, or diagnosis of Influenza A. A third resident had severe cognitive impairment, dementia, PTSD, behavioral symptoms, and wandering behavior. The resident's care plan included dining preference interventions stating the resident preferred to sit alone during meals and liked to sit in the dining room by the television next to the window, but the EHR showed the resident had behavior management interventions in place, including a bookshelf sticker on the door and a door chime to alert staff when the room door opened, and these interventions were not included in the care plan. Observations showed the resident with wandering and behavioral concerns eating and sitting with other residents in the dining room rather than alone, and staff interviews confirmed the resident had become less agitated, spent more time outside the room, and that the door chime and bookshelf sticker had been implemented and were effective. Interviews also confirmed the hospice discharge, the healed wound, the ongoing catheter-related EBP need, and that Influenza A had not been present for quite some time. The DON stated care plans should be updated whenever there was a new diagnosis, condition, intervention, preference change, or other significant change in status, and that care plans served as the primary communication tool for staff. The facility also failed to update care plans for two residents with electronic monitoring in their rooms. One resident's care plan lacked the use of a camera, the rationale for it, and the fact that family had placed it for monitoring and interaction. Another resident's care plan also lacked the use of a video camera with audio capability, the rationale, and related interventions such as signage, staff awareness, and family interaction through audio. Records showed consent forms and progress notes documenting the cameras, staff notification, signage, and family involvement, but these details were not reflected in the care plans. Staff interviews confirmed that the camera use should have been outlined in the care plans and that nursing staff were responsible for updating them.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.