Citations in Alaska
Statistics, citations and compliance trends for long-term care facilities in Alaska.
Statistics for Alaska (Last 12 Months)
Financial Impact (Last 12 Months)
Latest citations in Alaska
Opened glucometer test-strip containers on multiple units were found without an open date, and staff could not verify when they had been opened. Expired medications and supplies were also found in several medication carts and a medication room, including ointment, IV sets, feeding tubes, jelly, saline bullets, and a syringe. The DON stated the containers should have been labeled and acknowledged that expired items should not be present.
Incomplete and inconsistent AD and POLST documentation was found for multiple residents. One resident’s AD and POLST conflicted on artificial nutrition and hydration, another resident’s AD called for comfort care only while the POLST selected CPR and full treatments, and other residents’ POLSTs documented “no decision made” or that an AD was not available despite ADs being present. Staff interviews showed an LN had marked the AD-review section without confirming the AD, the RA was not comparing ADs with POLSTs, and the DON said review responsibilities were shared among staff.
Failure to Obtain Informed Consent Before Starting Duloxetine: The facility failed to obtain and document informed consent before starting Duloxetine for a resident with anxiety, depression, and chronic pain. The DON confirmed there was no informed consent for the medication, and the facility policy required informed consent before initiating psychotropic meds, including discussion of the target symptom, intended benefit, risks/side effects, and alternatives.
A resident with anoxic brain damage, pulmonary hypertension, and paraplegia was not shown to have participated, along with the RR, in the development and revision of the person-centered care plan during the review period. The record lacked documentation of notifications, invitations, or participation in care conferences between IDT meetings, and staff could not locate the quarterly care plan signature page that was supposed to show resident or RR review and input.
Failure to Send AD During Hospital Transfer: A resident with anoxic brain injury, pulmonary HTN, and paraplegia was transferred to the hospital after seizure activity and decreased responsiveness. The facility sent the POLST with the transfer paperwork but did not send the resident's AD, which stated a wish to receive artificial nutrition and hydration indefinitely; the POLST instead indicated no decision made for medically assisted nutrition and that an AD was not available. The DON acknowledged the AD was not sent to the receiving hospital.
Failure to Coordinate PASRR Assessment for a Resident Staying Beyond Approved Convalescent Period: A resident with vascular dementia, PTSD, and depression remained in the facility beyond the PASRR-approved convalescent care period, but the facility did not notify SDS as required or obtain a PASRR Level II evaluation. The DON could not locate documentation of a Level II review, and SDS confirmed it had not been notified of the ongoing LTC stay and that the case was non-compliant with the PASRR process.
Unlabeled Glucometer Strips and Expired Medications/Supplies Found in Storage Areas
Penalty
Summary
Drugs and biologicals used in the facility were not consistently labeled and expired medications and supplies were found in medication carts and a medication room. During observations on 8/12/26, opened glucometer test-strip containers without an opened date were found on the Willow, Susitna, Denali, and [NAME] units. Staff on those units confirmed they could not verify when the containers had been opened, and the DON stated the containers should have been labeled with the date, time, initials, and date opened. The facility also had expired medications and supplies in multiple storage areas. On 8/11/26, expired items were observed in the [NAME] Pass nurses’ station medication room, including triple antibiotic ointment packets, IV administration sets, and EnteraFlo gastrostomy feeding tubes. Additional expired items were found in the [NAME] medication cart, Denali medication cart, and Susitna medication cart, including Medihoney gel, hydrocortisone cream, saline bullets, lubricating jelly, antibacterial ointment, and a BD 1-mL syringe. Nurses verified the items were expired during interviews. The DON stated night shift charge nurses completed monthly audits of medications and supplies, but staff may have focused more on medications and forgotten other supplies. The DON also stated the person responsible for tracking lot numbers and upcoming expiration dates was supposed to send internal messages about items nearing expiration, and acknowledged that did not happen. Facility policy required medications and supplies to be clearly labeled, rotated, checked on a scheduled basis, and removed when expired or compromised, and the manufacturer’s guide for the glucometer strips required the date opened to be recorded on the bottle label.
Incomplete and Inconsistent AD and POLST Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented medical records for residents reviewed for Advance Directive (AD) and POLST documentation. Surveyors found that material differences between residents’ documented treatment preferences in their ADs and POLSTs were not identified or clarified in the medical record, and staff also inaccurately documented whether an AD had been reviewed when completing a POLST. The report states this resulted in residents’ records containing inaccurate and/or unreconciled treatment-preference information. For one resident, the AD directed that artificial nutrition and hydration be provided indefinitely unless it clearly increased suffering and was no longer in the resident’s best interest, while the POLST documented “No decision made” for medically assisted nutrition. The POLST also lacked the physician’s date next to the signature. During interview, an LN confirmed the signature but stated he/she did not believe the resident had an AD at admission and acknowledged, “I probably did that wrong.” The resident’s record did not contain a revised POLST after the AD was completed. For other residents, the ADs and POLSTs also did not match or were incomplete. One resident’s AD stated artificial nutrition and hydration should be part of comfort care and not used to artificially extend life, while the POLST again documented “No decision made” for medically assisted nutrition. Another resident’s AD indicated comfort care only and no artificial nutrition and hydration, yet the POLST selected CPR and full treatments and also documented “No decision made” for medically assisted nutrition. A fourth resident’s AD indicated a wish to receive artificial nutrition and hydration indefinitely, while the POLST documented “No decision made” for medically assisted nutrition and marked “Advance directive not available.” Staff interviews showed the LN had been checking “yes” on the POLST AD-review section without access to the AD, the RA had not been reviewing POLSTs against ADs, and the DON stated responsibility was shared among staff and that the IDT meeting should identify and correct differences.
Failure to Obtain Informed Consent Before Starting Duloxetine
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident #7 was informed in advance, by the physician or other professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, treatment alternatives, and the option to choose the preferred treatment before Duloxetine was started. Resident #7 was admitted with diagnoses including unspecified anxiety disorder, unspecified depression, and chronic pain. Record review showed an order for Duloxetine HCl 30 mg, and the medication record indicated that Duloxetine was initiated on 4/15/26, later discontinued and reordered, and remained active as of 7/8/26. During interview on 8/13/26, the DON stated there was no informed consent for Resident #7’s Duloxetine and said, “We are working on it now.” The facility’s Informed Consent policy stated that no treatment, procedure, or service requiring informed consent is to be initiated without informed consent from the resident or representative, and that psychotropic medications require documented informed consent before initiation. The policy also required discussion of the target symptom or condition, intended benefit, potential risks and side effects, and available alternatives before starting a psychotropic medication.
Resident and Representative Not Included in Care Plan Revisions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #40 and/or the resident representative were able to participate in the development and revision of the person-centered plan of care. Resident #40 was admitted with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, pulmonary hypertension, and paraplegia. The resident had multiple MDS assessments completed during 2026, including a significant change assessment and quarterly assessments, and the care plan addressed psychosocial well-being concerns related to anxiety, depression, little interest or pleasure in doing things, and trauma-related experiences. The care plan was initiated on 4/30/25 and revised on 2/12/26, but the record did not show documentation that Resident #40 or the resident representative was notified of, invited to, or participated in care conferences between the January and August 2026 IDT meetings. The EMR showed IDT care conferences occurred on 1/15/26 and 8/13/26, and documentation supported resident and representative involvement at those conferences, but there were no other documented care conferences during that period. There was also no documentation that the resident or representative participated in the development or revision of the care plan during that time. During interviews, the Resident Advocate stated she generally scheduled the resident's IDT care conferences around the representative's availability and that the representative attended the 8/13/26 meeting, but she could not find notes explaining why meetings had been delayed or rescheduled. The Corporate Quality Assurance Nurse stated the facility used a Care Plan Summary Signature Page to show quarterly review with the resident or representative, but no such signed page could be located in the record for Resident #40. The MDS Coordinator stated she completed quarterly care plan reviews based on chart review, orders, nursing notes, and IDT notes when available, and if no IDT had been held she relied on the existing notes and orders.
Failure to Send Advance Directive During Hospital Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate information was provided to the receiving hospital during the transfer of a resident who had an anoxic brain injury, pulmonary hypertension, and paraplegia. The resident was transferred to the hospital on 7/25/26 after seizure activity and altered responsiveness were documented in nursing notes, and the on-call NP directed that the resident be sent to the emergency room for further evaluation. The charge nurse called 911, notified the resident representative, and the resident was transported by ambulance to Mat-Su Regional Medical Center. During review of the transfer paperwork, the facility sent the resident's POLST with the hospital transfer but did not send the resident's Advance Directive. The resident's AD, dated 11/24/24, stated that the resident wished to receive artificial nutrition and hydration indefinitely, while the POLST dated 12/30/25 documented medically assisted nutrition as "No decision made (standard of care provided)" and indicated that an advance directive was not available. The DON reviewed the transfer documents and acknowledged that the AD did not get sent to the receiving facility. The facility policy required staff to inform emergency medical personnel of a resident's advance directive and provide a copy of the AD or POLST when transferring the resident, and the transfer/discharge policy required appropriate information to be communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider.
Failure to Coordinate PASRR Assessment for Resident Staying Beyond Approved Convalescent Period
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to coordinate assessments with the PASRR program for a resident admitted with diagnoses including vascular dementia, PTSD, and unspecified depression. The resident's PASRR Level I determination specified convalescent care for 90 days or less and stated that if the individual stayed beyond 90 days, an individualized PASRR Level II evaluation had to be completed, with the facility required to notify SDS on day 85 that the resident would need services beyond 90 days. Record review and interview showed the resident remained in the facility beyond the approved convalescent care period, but the facility did not notify SDS by the required date and no PASRR Level II evaluation was found. The DON stated the facility could not locate any record showing the resident received a PASRR Level II evaluation or that SDS had been contacted to continue the assessment process. Email correspondence from SDS confirmed it had not been notified of the ongoing LTC stay and that the case was non-compliant with the PASRR process.
Find your facility
Search by name to see its inspection history, citations and penalties — and how to prepare for the next survey.
Get alerted when Immediate Jeopardy citations hit in Alaska — free
You're all set
Compliance trends in Alaska
Data through Jul 2026Comparisons below measure the most recent period Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 against the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025 (two equal 12-month windows). The most recent 1 months are excluded because CMS is still publishing them.
Top tags by month · last 24 months
dashed = still reportingMonthly citation counts for the 5 most-cited tags. The dashed tail is the 1-month reporting lag.
Care domain movers
Citations grouped into CFR care domains — F-tags by their §483 regulatory section (CMS State Operations Manual, Appendix PP) — measured as a rate per 100 inspections: Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 vs the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025. Share is the domain's portion of citations this period; avg severity is the mean scope/severity letter and immediate jeopardy the percentage cited at J–L, both over the current period. Domains with at least 20 citations in both periods are shown; the sparkline tracks the last 12 months (left = oldest).
Immediate jeopardies · this period
Citations at the most serious scope/severity — J–L, immediate jeopardy, residents placed at risk of serious harm or death — over Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 vs the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025. "Surveys with an IJ" counts distinct health inspections that had at least one.
Survey activity · by month
faded/dashed = still reportingCitations each month split into complaint-driven (unscheduled, triggered by grievances) vs standard surveys — bars, left axis — with the number of inspections as a line on the right axis. Rising inspections signal more scrutiny; a rising complaint share means more off-cycle surveys. The most recent 1 months are still being reported.
Deficiency-free survey rate
Share of health surveys that found zero deficiencies — the odds of a clean survey. Aug 2025 – Jul 2026 vs the prior period Aug 2024 – Jul 2025; the most recent 1 months are still being reported (dashed).
Penalties · by month
faded = still reportingTotal civil money penalty dollars imposed on the state's facilities each month — how hard the state is enforcing. The most recent 1 months are still being reported, and penalties often lag citations by several months.
Emerging tags
Tags that weren't established last period but surged — an early warning, distinct from movers (which track already-common tags). Criteria: fewer than 20 citations in the prior period, but at least 10 this period and 2.5× their prior volume. The sparkline shows monthly counts over the last 12 months (left = oldest).
No tags meet the emerging criteria for this period — nothing rare is spiking right now.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.
