Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Gracewood Health & Rehab during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident sustained a leg fracture after being pushed to the ground by another resident in the smoking area following an altercation in which water was poured on one resident. Staff found the injured resident on the ground, yelling in pain and unable to get up, and hospital x‑rays confirmed a leg fracture. The resident who pushed had bipolar disorder, PTSD, depression, anxiety, and moderate cognitive impairment, yet their care plan did not identify behaviors or include a behavior care plan, despite facility policy requiring assessment and care plan interventions for residents at risk of abusing others. An LPN acknowledged that a behavior care plan should have been in place, while the administrator reported that the injured resident was considered the aggressor and that the other resident was generally not a problem unless unable to smoke.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment in both the kitchen and a resident restroom. In the kitchen, the floor between two sinks had been torn up and filled with gravel for about a year following a flood, and staff reported they could only clean it as best as possible. Meals were being served on paper plates with plastic utensils because the dishwasher was not in use during ongoing construction. In a resident restroom, hot water was not available, the sink was pulled away from the wall with chipped and torn paint behind it, and the toilet lid was removed and placed under the sink. The resident reported wanting hot water to wash their face, and the ADON acknowledged the hot water problem and described it as a financial issue affecting what maintenance could do.
A resident with Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, and severely impaired cognition was initially assessed as not being an elopement risk, but later eloped after a lapse in supervision at an exit door. Observations showed the resident generally resting in bed without elopement behaviors and being easily redirected when seen in the hallway. Staff reported they kept close tabs on the resident, but the administrator acknowledged staff should have ensured no resident followed them out an exit, resulting in a deficiency for failure to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement.
The facility failed to provide privacy curtains in certain rooms, affecting residents' privacy during personal activities. Observations showed rooms without curtains, and a resident reported a lack of privacy. The DON confirmed the issue, noting maintenance had removed curtains after work was done. Maintenance staff acknowledged the absence of curtain tracks, leaving residents without privacy.
The facility failed to provide adequate activities for four residents with unique needs, including one with mobility issues due to a damaged wheelchair and others with dementia requiring structured programs. Staff were unaware of specific needs, and documentation did not reflect care plans, indicating a lack of oversight and personalized care.
The facility failed to conduct monthly medication regimen reviews for several residents, as required by its policy. Residents with various diagnoses, including schizoaffective disorder, dementia, and anxiety, had missing reviews for multiple months. Interviews revealed issues with medical records and the accuracy of medication orders, with the pharmacist facing challenges in accessing lab results and relying on unreliable records.
The facility failed to secure and properly manage medications across several carts. Medication carts were left unlocked and unattended, and medications were not dated when opened or discarded after 28 days. Expired medications were also found on a cart. The DON acknowledged these oversights.
The facility failed to maintain complete and accessible records for several residents, including those with dementia and schizoaffective disorder. Records were missing current physician's orders, medication regimen reviews, and lab results. The DON and MDS coordinator were responsible for record completeness but lacked a monitoring system. The pharmacist faced challenges accessing accurate orders and lab results, indicating systemic issues in record-keeping practices.
The facility failed to ensure operational call lights for residents, as multiple rooms were observed without call light cords and some had exposed wires. Despite a policy requiring call systems, maintenance logs and staff interviews revealed ongoing issues, with residents reportedly removing call lights and replacements delayed. The administrator did not provide a solution for residents needing assistance without call lights.
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for a resident with a PEG tube during medication administration and site care. The policy requires gowns and gloves for high-contact activities, but RN #1 only used gloves. There was no signage indicating precautions near the resident's room, and the DON was unaware of the policy.
A resident with dementia, dependent on staff for ADL care, did not receive adequate nail care as per facility policy. Despite the requirement for daily cleaning and regular trimming, the resident's records showed minimal documentation of nail care being offered or provided. Observations revealed long, debris-filled nails, and staff interviews confirmed the resident's dependency on staff for nail care. The DON acknowledged the lack of documentation and monitoring, indicating a failure in policy adherence.
A resident with dementia and delusions had a bruise on their neck that was not documented or monitored by the facility. Despite staff awareness and previous reports, the bruise was not addressed according to protocol, and no documentation was found to support any intervention by the medical director. The facility failed to follow its protocol for reporting and assessing the resident's condition.
A facility failed to properly assess and document the use of bed rails for a resident with dementia and hemiparesis. The resident was observed with bed rails, but the assessment was incomplete, and there was no documentation of medical necessity, alternative interventions, or informed consent. Staff were unaware of the necessity for the rails, and the care plan did not reflect their use.
The facility did not post nurse staffing information for public view as required. Although staffing numbers were generally adequate, the administrator admitted that the total number of nursing hours was not posted. The DON stated that the daily schedule book, which was supposed to be at the nurses' desk, was in their office and lacked the total nursing hours.
A facility failed to ensure proper monitoring and documentation for a resident receiving psychotropic medications, including Risperdal, without evidence of side effect monitoring or a medication regimen review. The care plan was not updated to include Risperdal, and the DON cited issues with medical records as the reason for the lack of documentation. The pharmacist had no record of a recent order for Risperdal, indicating a communication and documentation failure.
The facility failed to complete physician-ordered lab tests for two residents. A resident with schizoaffective disorder did not have a valproic acid level obtained as ordered, and another resident with vascular dementia did not have a CMP completed as scheduled. The DON acknowledged responsibility but did not provide additional lab reports.
A facility failed to document regular safety inspections of a resident's bed, who had unspecified dementia and hemiparesis, and was using bed rails. The facility's policy required regular inspections to identify risks, but no documentation was found. Observations confirmed the use of bedrails, and interviews revealed that maintenance staff did not document safety checks, addressing issues only when noticed or during rounds.
The facility failed to ensure an RN was licensed in accordance with state laws. An RN was observed working as a charge nurse with a valid Texas license but an expired Oklahoma license. The DON was unaware of the expired license, and the RN had been working full-time since a specified date.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Physical Abuse and Inadequate Behavior Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse by another resident when a resident sustained a leg fracture after being pushed. According to an Oklahoma State Department of Health final report, a staff member witnessed one resident pour water on another resident, who then pushed the first resident, causing them to fall. A nursing note documented that around 5:30 p.m. the pushed resident was found on the ground in the smoking area, yelling and reporting that the other resident had pushed them down. Staff attempted to assist the resident up, but the resident reported being in great pain and unable to get up. Hospital x‑ray records from the same day showed the resident sustained a leg fracture. The deficiency was further supported by record review showing that the resident who pushed the other had multiple psychiatric diagnoses, including bipolar disorder, PTSD, depression, and anxiety, and a BIMS score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Despite these conditions and the incident in which the resident pushed another resident, the resident’s care plan, reviewed later, did not show any behaviors, and an LPN stated there was no behavior care plan initiated for this resident and that there should have been. The administrator reported that the facility’s investigation concluded the injured resident was the aggressor and stated that the resident who pushed was not a problem unless they did not get to smoke, but the facility’s Resident to Resident Incidents policy required assessment for risk of abusing others and care plan interventions to prevent such occurrences.
Environmental and Sanitation Failures in Kitchen and Resident Restroom
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment in the kitchen and in at least one resident restroom. Surveyors observed on 03/31/26 that the tile floor between two sinks in the kitchen had been ripped up and filled in with gravel, and staff reported this condition had existed for about a year following a flood caused by a busted pipe. Staff stated they could only wipe down and sanitize as much as possible and did the best they could to keep the gravel-filled floor clean. During the same kitchen observation, food was seen being plated onto paper plates with plastic silverware, and the administrator later stated the dishwasher was not being used due to ongoing construction in the kitchen and that residents had been using paper products since the previous Friday. The deficiency also includes the facility’s failure to ensure hot water and proper maintenance in a resident restroom. On 03/31/26, the hot water in Resident #21’s restroom was observed to be nonfunctional. The sink was pulled away from the wall, with paint chips on the back of the sink and on the wall where it had previously been touching, and the wall paint around the sink was torn away. The toilet lid was observed sitting below the sink instead of on the back of the toilet. On 04/03/26, Resident #21 stated they did not want to change rooms and only wanted hot water available to wash their face. The ADON acknowledged awareness that the hot water issue in this resident’s room needed to be addressed, describing it as a financial issue and stating that maintenance could only do what they were approved to do, and indicated they would have to ask maintenance about the toilet and sink in the restroom.
Failure to Provide Adequate Supervision to Prevent Resident Elopement
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for one resident in the memory care unit. The resident had diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, protein-calorie malnutrition, and hypertension, and an admission assessment documented severely impaired cognition without wandering behaviors. An elopement risk assessment completed in January indicated the resident was not an elopement risk. Despite this, the resident was later involved in an elopement event that prompted the facility to reassess elopement risk and implement increased monitoring. Surveyor observations on multiple days showed the resident resting in bed without elopement behaviors and later walking in the hallway in pajamas, where the resident was pleasant and easily redirected by staff. Certified nursing staff reported that they kept close tabs on the resident’s whereabouts at all times. The administrator later acknowledged that staff should have ensured no resident followed them out of an exit door, indicating that a lapse in supervision at an exit allowed the resident to elope, leading to the cited deficiency for not ensuring the area was free from accident hazards and that adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents.
Lack of Privacy Curtains in Resident Rooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents were provided with privacy curtains, compromising their privacy. Observations revealed that certain rooms lacked privacy curtains, affecting the residents' ability to maintain privacy during personal activities. In one instance, a resident expressed that all activities, except using the restroom, were conducted in full view of their roommate due to the absence of a privacy curtain. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that privacy was not effectively provided in a room where maintenance had removed the curtain following work completed a month prior. Maintenance staff confirmed the absence of curtain tracks in the room and were unsure why they had not been installed, resulting in a lack of privacy for the residents.
Inadequate Activity Provision for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate activities for four residents, each with unique needs and conditions. Resident #18, who had chronic pain, obesity, and limited mobility, was unable to participate in activities due to an uncomfortable and damaged wheelchair. Despite expressing the need for a better wheelchair, staff were unaware of the issue until it was brought to the attention of the Director of Nursing (DON), who then took action to replace it. The lack of communication and awareness among staff about the resident's needs contributed to the deficiency. Resident #22, diagnosed with dementia and anxiety, was observed to have little engagement in activities despite a care plan that emphasized the need for sensory stimulation and structured programs. The resident was often found in bed, and there was no evidence of activities occurring on the memory unit. The activities director admitted to not monitoring activity documentation and was unaware of the specific goals for Resident #22, indicating a lack of oversight and personalized care. Resident #26, with Alzheimer's disease and dementia, and Resident #42, with vascular dementia, also experienced inadequate activity provision. Both residents had care plans that outlined specific activities and goals, but the documentation did not reflect these interventions. The activities director acknowledged the lack of formal training in dementia care and the absence of proper documentation, which contributed to the failure in meeting the residents' needs. The administrator confirmed that the activities director was responsible for documenting and completing activities, but there was a lack of daily monitoring and tracking by the social services director.
Failure to Conduct Monthly Medication Regimen Reviews
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that monthly medication regimen reviews (MRRs) were conducted by a licensed pharmacist for five residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility's policy required the consultant pharmacist to review each resident's medication regimen monthly and provide a written, signed, and dated report to the Director of Nursing Services and Medical Director. However, the clinical records for residents #24, #57, #62, #22, and #59 revealed missing MRRs for various months in 2024, indicating non-compliance with the facility's policy. Resident #24, diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, did not have MRRs conducted in January, February, March, or July 2024. Resident #57, with unspecified dementia, lacked MRRs for December 2023 and March 2024. Resident #62, diagnosed with vascular dementia, was missing an MRR for January 2024. Resident #22, with Alzheimer's disease/dementia, anxiety, and depression, had missing MRRs for January, February, March, and August 2024. Additionally, the care plan for Resident #22 was not updated to include all current medications. Resident #59, with dementia and anxiety, had missing MRRs for several months in 2024, and the clinical record did not reveal lab results. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the pharmacist highlighted issues with medical records and the accuracy of medication orders. The pharmacist reported difficulties accessing lab results and relied on the medication administration record rather than the clinical record due to its unreliability. The pharmacist also mentioned challenges in obtaining lab access and noted that they visited the facility monthly, with reports delivered shortly after. These deficiencies in conducting timely MRRs and maintaining accurate clinical records contributed to the facility's failure to comply with its medication management policies.
Medication Management Deficiencies in Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the security and proper management of medications across several medication carts. On multiple occasions, the 300 hall treatment cart was left unattended and unlocked by RN #2 and RN #1 during medication administration, contrary to the facility's policy that requires medication carts to be locked when not in use. Additionally, medication cups containing various medications were left unattended on top of the cart. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that medication carts should be locked when unattended. The facility also failed to date medications when opened and did not discard insulin after 28 days as required. Observations revealed that several inhalers and insulin vials on the 200 and 300 hall treatment carts were opened but not dated. Furthermore, expired medications were found on the 100 hall medication cart, including Tussin DM and geri-lanta, which had passed their expiration dates. The DON acknowledged the oversight in monitoring for expired medications and the failure to date opened medications.
Incomplete and Inaccessible Resident Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that resident records were complete and accessible for four of the 18 sampled residents. The Medication Orders policy required a current list of orders to be maintained in each resident's clinical record, and the Charting and Documentation policy required documentation of all services provided, progress toward care plan goals, and any changes in the resident's condition. However, the records for residents with diagnoses such as dementia, schizoaffective disorder, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, and depression were found to be incomplete. For instance, Resident #57's records lacked recent dose reductions and lab reports, while Resident #24's records were missing current physician's orders. Resident #22's records were missing several months of medication regimen reviews, and Resident #59's records lacked multiple months of medication regimen reviews and lab results. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the MDS coordinator were identified as responsible for ensuring the completeness and accessibility of clinical records, but they admitted to not knowing how records were monitored. The pharmacist also expressed difficulties in accessing accurate orders and lab results, relying instead on the medication administration record and staff assistance to obtain necessary information. The pharmacist noted that they had not seen certain medication orders and had issues with lab access, indicating a systemic problem with the facility's record-keeping practices. These deficiencies in maintaining complete and accessible records hindered effective communication and care coordination for the residents involved.
Deficiency in Call Light System Availability
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that call lights were operational and available for residents, as observed during a survey. The facility's policy, reviewed in May 2024, mandates that all resident rooms be equipped with a call system for staff assistance. However, multiple observations revealed deficiencies in this area. On several occasions, rooms were found without call light cords, and some had exposed wires where the call lights should have been. Specifically, on January 6, 2025, several rooms were noted to lack call light cords, and exposed wires were observed in some rooms. Additionally, on January 8, 2025, a room was found with wires protruding from the wall where the call light should be. The maintenance log indicated that a call light was ripped from the wall in one room on December 28, 2024, with repairs documented on December 30, 2024. Despite this, issues persisted into January 2025. Maintenance staff reported that residents removed call lights and did not replace them, and it had been about a month since new call lights were ordered by the administrator. When questioned about how residents could notify staff without call lights, the administrator did not provide an answer, highlighting a significant gap in ensuring resident safety and communication with staff.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident with PEG Tube
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for a resident with a PEG tube during medication administration and site care. The Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated August 2022, requires the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities, such as device care or use, including feeding tubes. However, during observations, RN #1 was seen administering medications and performing PEG tube site care for Resident #279 without utilizing the required personal protective equipment (PPE) except for gloves. Additionally, there was no signage indicating enhanced barrier precautions or PPE requirements near the resident's room. The nurse manager identified two residents with PEG tubes, and the Director of Nursing (DON) admitted to not understanding what enhanced barrier precautions were, indicating a lack of awareness and implementation of the facility's policy.
Failure to Provide Adequate Nail Care for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate nail care for a resident diagnosed with unspecified dementia, who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) care. The facility's policy required daily cleaning and regular trimming of nails, with documentation of any refusals and notification to the supervisor. However, the resident's Activity of Daily Living Record showed that nail care was offered or provided only five times out of 93 opportunities in December 2024, and not at all during the first week of January 2025. Observations on January 6 and January 9 revealed the resident's fingernails were approximately a quarter inch long with dark debris underneath, despite the resident's preference for shorter nails. Interviews with facility staff, including a CNA and an LPN, confirmed that the resident was dependent on staff for nail care and that refusals were sometimes documented. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the lack of documentation and stated that nail care should have been provided on scheduled shower days and as needed. Upon reviewing the records and observing the resident's nails, the DON admitted that the facility had failed to adequately monitor and document nail care, indicating a lapse in the facility's adherence to its own care policies.
Failure to Monitor and Document Resident's Bruising
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor and evaluate a resident's response to an intervention, specifically regarding the presence of bruising on the neck of a resident diagnosed with vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and delusions. The care plan for the resident included monitoring for skin alterations due to incontinence and notifying the physician of changes such as bruising. However, there was no documentation of concern regarding bruising in the care plan, and no records of the bruise on the resident's neck were found in the priority charting or physician progress notes. Staff members, including LPNs and CNAs, were unaware of the bruise or had previously reported it without follow-up. The DON acknowledged that the bruising had been addressed over a year ago but had not been re-evaluated since it resolved without intervention. Despite the DON's claim that the medical director had addressed the issue by discontinuing aspirin, no documentation was found to support this. The facility's protocol for reporting and assessing such incidents was not followed, as evidenced by the lack of documentation and communication with the physician regarding the resident's condition.
Failure to Properly Assess and Document Bed Rail Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was properly assessed for the use of bed rails, as required by their policy. The policy mandates that side rails should only be used to treat a resident's medical symptoms or assist with mobility and transfer, and requires a comprehensive assessment including the resident's bed mobility, risk of entrapment, and appropriateness of bed dimensions. Additionally, documentation should indicate if less restrictive approaches were unsuccessful, and informed consent should be obtained after discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or their representative. However, for the resident in question, the assessment was incomplete, and there was no documentation indicating that the side rails treated a medical condition, that alternative interventions had been attempted, or that informed consent had been obtained. The resident, who had unspecified dementia and hemiparesis of the left side, was observed with half bed rails in the up position, yet they stated they did not use them and assumed they were for safety. The LPN and DON were unaware of the necessity for bilateral side rails, given the resident's inability to utilize their left side. The DON admitted that the resident preferred the rails but did not require them, and acknowledged that the assessment was not completed. Furthermore, the care plan did not document the use of bed rails, and the care plan coordinator was unaware of their presence, indicating a lack of communication and documentation within the facility regarding the resident's care needs and the use of bed rails.
Failure to Post Nurse Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that nurse staffing information was posted for public view, which is a requirement. During a review of the Quality of Care (QOC) reports for October, November, and December 2024, it was noted that staffing numbers were generally adequate, except for one day shift in December. On January 14, 2025, the administrator acknowledged that while they had the staff names and positions for each shift on each hall, they did not have the total number of nursing hours posted. Additionally, the Director of Nursing (DON) mentioned that there was a book containing the daily schedule at the nurses' desk, but during the survey, the book was in their office, and it did not include the total nursing hours.
Failure to Monitor and Document Psychotropic Medication Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident did not receive unnecessary medications, specifically psychotropic drugs, without proper monitoring and documentation. The resident, who had diagnoses including Alzheimer's/dementia, anxiety, and depression, was receiving multiple psychotropic medications such as Nuedexta, trazodone, Ativan, and Risperdal. However, the clinical record lacked documentation of side effect monitoring or evidence that the physician was provided with a medication regimen review (MRR) or a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for Risperdal. Additionally, the care plan for the resident was not updated to include Risperdal, despite documenting concerns for psychotropic drug use and approaches to evaluate the effectiveness and side effects of medications. The Director of Nursing (DON) was unable to provide a clear policy regarding gradual dose reductions and cited issues with medical records as the reason for the lack of documentation. Furthermore, the pharmacist reported not having seen an order for Risperdal since they started in April 2023 and had no notes about the resident being on Risperdal recently. This indicates a failure in communication and documentation within the facility, leading to the resident potentially receiving unnecessary medication without proper oversight.
Failure to Complete Physician-Ordered Lab Tests
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that laboratory tests were completed as ordered by the physician for two residents. One resident, diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, had a physician's order to obtain a valproic acid level every three months in July, October, January, and April. However, the clinical record and labs provided did not show that the valproic acid level was obtained in July or October 2024. Another resident, diagnosed with vascular dementia, had a physician's order to obtain a comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) every six months. The last CMP was obtained in May 2024, but there was no record of a CMP for November 2024. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged responsibility for ensuring labs were obtained as ordered and mentioned issues with medical records obtaining and filing lab reports. Despite this, no additional lab reports were provided by the end of the survey.
Failure to Document Regular Bed Safety Inspections
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure regular safety inspections of resident beds, specifically for a resident with unspecified dementia and hemiparesis of the left side, who was using bed rails. The facility's Bed Safety policy, dated June 2024, mandates regular inspections by maintenance staff to identify risks, including potential entrapment risks, and to ensure proper installation of bedrails. However, a review of the clinical record and maintenance logs revealed no documentation of regular safety inspections for the resident's bed. Observations confirmed the resident was using half bedrails in the up position. Interviews with the DON and a maintenance worker indicated that while maintenance staff were responsible for bed safety inspections, they did not document these checks, relying instead on addressing issues as they were brought to their attention or during routine rounds. The administrator confirmed the lack of documentation for these inspections.
Failure to Ensure RN Licensing Compliance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse (RN) was licensed in accordance with applicable state laws. An RN was observed working as the charge nurse at the nurse station, and their employee record showed a valid RN license for the state of Texas but not for Oklahoma. Upon review, the administrator found that the RN's Oklahoma license had expired, as confirmed by documentation from the Oklahoma Board of Nursing. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the RN had been working full-time at the facility since a specified date, with only one break in full-time status, and was unaware of the expired Oklahoma license.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 113 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Tulsa
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Woods, Inc. | 1.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Emerald Care Center Tulsa | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Southern Hills Rehabilitation Center | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Oklahoma Memory Care Institute | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| Tulsa Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare | 2.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Gracewood Health & Rehab.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 2026) and official state health department websites.