Average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around September 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Baptist Village Of Owasso during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident who was dependent on staff for transfers fell from a mechanical lift during a transfer due to a damaged sling that had not been properly inspected, resulting in a head injury and hospitalization. The facility failed to conduct and document required monthly inspections of mechanical lift slings as recommended by the manufacturer, and staff did not identify the damaged sling prior to use.
Three residents were not given accurate CMS-10055 forms regarding the end of their Medicare/Medicaid skilled service coverage. The forms contained incorrect dates, such as admission dates instead of last covered dates, or dates prior to admission, and did not include required cost information. An LPN responsible for the forms was unaware of their correct purpose and completion, and the administrator confirmed the forms were not filled out as required.
A resident diagnosed with dementia without behavioral disturbances was prescribed sertraline, an antidepressant, for dementia. Facility policy required clear documentation of the indication for psychotropic medications, but staff interviews revealed uncertainty about the specific symptoms being treated and whether sertraline was appropriate for dementia. The pharmacist and nurse practitioner confirmed that sertraline is not approved for dementia, and the DON was unsure about its approved uses.
A discharge assessment was not completed for a resident who was discharged, despite the requirement for a discharge MDS. The MDS coordinator confirmed the omission and could not explain why the assessment was not done.
A resident with dementia and a history of falls experienced another fall resulting in injury, but the care plan was not updated to reflect this incident or add new interventions. The LPN responsible for care plan updates was waiting for an incident report, a process that had lapsed after the former DON left, leading to the omission. The DON confirmed this was not in line with facility procedures.
A CNA did not wear a gown while providing catheter care to a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) with an indwelling urinary catheter, contrary to facility policy. Interviews with the resident, CNA, LPN, and DON confirmed that gowns should be worn during such care, and the resident reported that staff typically did not use gowns.
An Immediate Jeopardy situation occurred when a resident reported being inappropriately touched by another resident in the dining area. The facility failed to implement protective measures, leaving the resident feeling anxious and unsafe. Staff were not adequately instructed on monitoring the involved residents, and the facility's abuse policy was not effectively followed.
The facility failed to ensure that residents did not receive antipsychotic medications without a specific diagnosis condition. Three residents were identified as receiving such medications without appropriate documentation of a psychotic disturbance or mood disorder. The DON and Corporate RN acknowledged the need to consult with the pharmacy consultant, who confirmed that dementia alone was not an appropriate diagnosis for antipsychotic medication use.
The facility failed to complete and submit discharge assessments for two residents who were transferred to the hospital. One resident, with acute and chronic respiratory failure, diabetes type II, and congestive heart failure, expired at the hospital, and their discharge assessment was not completed due to it being an unplanned discharge. Another resident, with malignant neoplasm of the cervix, chronic kidney disease stage III, and type II diabetes, was also discharged to the hospital without a timely discharge assessment, as it was forgotten by the MDS Coordinator.
The facility did not ensure RN certification of resident assessments, affecting four residents. Their electronic clinical records lacked quarterly assessments due to missing RN signatures. One resident's assessment was rejected for a mood miscalculation and required reopening by the RN. The MDS Coordinator confirmed the need for RN signatures and communicated with the RN via email for necessary corrections.
Failure to Inspect and Maintain Mechanical Lift Slings Results in Resident Fall and Injury
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident, who was dependent on staff for transfers and had unimpaired cognition, fell from a mechanical lift during a transfer. The incident happened when the resident was being moved from their bed to a chair using a mechanical lift and sling. During the transfer, the resident slid out of the sling and ended up on the floor with their head on the ground and feet still in the sling. Inspection of the sling used revealed a cut or tear approximately three-quarters of an inch in length on one of the blue loops, which was about half the width of the loop. The remainder of the sling showed no other signs of damage or wear. The resident was subsequently transferred to a hospital, where a CT scan revealed a small subarachnoid hemorrhage, and the resident spent several days in the ICU before returning to the facility. The facility failed to ensure that mechanical lift slings were inspected as recommended by the manufacturer. The operator's manual specified that slings should be inspected monthly by nursing or rehabilitation staff, with permanent records of these inspections maintained. However, interviews revealed that while some staff claimed to have performed inspections, there was no documentation of sling inspections prior to June, and maintenance staff did not inspect the slings, believing it was not required for rented equipment. Additionally, monthly checks on the mechanical lifts were not performed in April or May, and the responsibility for inspecting slings was not clearly assigned or documented. Staff involved in the transfer reported that they did not notice the broken loop prior to use, and the resident was wearing slick pajamas at the time, which may have contributed to the fall. The sling was removed from service after the incident. The facility's policy required that all necessary equipment be in working order, but the lack of documented inspections and failure to identify the damaged sling before use directly contributed to the resident's fall and subsequent injury.
Failure to Provide Accurate CMS-10055 Beneficiary Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide residents with accurate and complete CMS-10055 forms, which are required to notify residents of the end of Medicare/Medicaid coverage for skilled services and their potential financial liability for services not covered. For three sampled residents, the forms either listed the admission date instead of the last covered date, provided a date prior to admission, or omitted the cost of continued skilled services. These errors were identified through record review, which showed discrepancies between the dates on the forms and the residents' actual admission and service end dates, as well as missing cost information. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of understanding regarding the purpose and correct completion of the CMS-10055 form. An LPN responsible for reviewing the forms with residents admitted to incorrectly entering admission dates and omitting required cost information. The administrator confirmed that the form should indicate the last covered date and inform residents of the costs and options for continuing services after coverage ends, but this was not done correctly for the sampled residents.
Unnecessary Psychotropic Medication Prescribed for Dementia
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a diagnosis of dementia without behavioral disturbances was prescribed sertraline, a psychotropic medication approved for the treatment of depression, according to a physician's order. The medication administration record showed that the resident received sertraline 25 mg daily for 25 consecutive days. The facility's policy required that the indication for any psychotropic medication be thoroughly documented in the clinical record, including an appropriate supporting diagnosis and identification of behavioral symptoms being treated. However, the documentation indicated that sertraline was prescribed for dementia, and staff interviews revealed uncertainty regarding the specific symptoms being treated and whether sertraline was appropriate for dementia. The contracted pharmacist confirmed that sertraline is not approved for the treatment of dementia and stated an effort was being made to avoid psychotropic use in residents with dementia. The LPN interviewed was unable to specify the symptom for which the medication was prescribed and was unaware of its approval status for dementia. The nurse practitioner acknowledged that the resident was taking an antidepressant for dementia, which is not an approved use, but also noted the resident had signs of depression and was seeing a behavioral health group. The DON was also unsure if antidepressants or psychotropic medications were approved for dementia treatment.
Failure to Complete Discharge MDS Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a discharge assessment was completed for one of five sampled residents reviewed for assessments. Record review showed that the resident was discharged on 02/22/25 and had a history of sepsis and anemia. However, there was no documentation of a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) in the resident's health record. During an interview, the MDS coordinator confirmed that a discharge MDS had not been completed at the time of the resident's discharge and was unable to provide a reason for this omission.
Failure to Update Care Plan After Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update a comprehensive care plan for a resident after a fall that resulted in injury. According to the facility's policy, care plans must be updated with significant changes in a resident's condition, such as a fall. Record review showed that the resident had a history of falls, with the last documented fall and related interventions in the care plan occurring in January 2025. However, the resident experienced another fall in April 2025, which was witnessed by staff and resulted in the resident striking their left hip and shoulder. Despite this incident, the care plan was not updated to reflect the new fall or to include new goals or interventions for fall prevention. Interviews with staff revealed that the LPN responsible for updating care plans had been waiting for an incident report to provide new interventions, a process that had previously been managed by the former DON. Since the departure of the former DON, the system for communicating incident reports and interventions had lapsed, resulting in the April fall not being incorporated into the resident's care plan. The DON confirmed that the failure to update the care plan after the fall was contrary to facility procedures.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a certified nursing assistant (CNA) failed to wear a gown while providing catheter care to a resident who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility's policy required staff to use gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities for residents with indwelling medical devices, regardless of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) status. Observations confirmed that the CNA did not wear a gown during catheter care, and interviews with the resident, CNA, LPN, and Director of Nursing (DON) all acknowledged that a gown should have been worn. The resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment and an indwelling urinary catheter, also reported that staff usually did not wear gowns during care.
Failure to Protect Resident from Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
An Immediate Jeopardy situation was identified at a facility due to the failure to protect a resident from sexual abuse. The incident involved a resident who reported being inappropriately touched by another resident in the dining area. Despite the report, the facility did not implement measures to ensure the ongoing protection of the affected resident or other residents, leading to the resident feeling anxious and unsafe. The affected resident had a history of anxiety and dementia, with a moderately impaired cognitive status. The resident reported the inappropriate touching to a staff member, but the facility's response was inadequate, as they failed to separate the residents or monitor the situation effectively. The staff, including LPNs and CNAs, were not given clear instructions regarding the monitoring of the involved residents, and they were unaware of the whereabouts of the resident who committed the inappropriate act. The facility's abuse policy required immediate removal of the perpetrator from the situation, but this was not effectively implemented. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the incident as abuse and admitted that continued monitoring should have been ensured. The administrator also recognized that the facility had not taken all necessary actions to address the abuse, highlighting a significant lapse in the facility's duty to protect its residents.
Inappropriate Use of Antipsychotic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents did not receive antipsychotic medications without a specific diagnosis condition. Three residents were identified as receiving such medications without appropriate documentation of a psychotic disturbance or mood disorder. Resident #37 was prescribed Risperdal for unspecified dementia without any documented diagnosis of psychotic or mood disturbances. Similarly, Resident #55 was given Quetiapine for unspecified dementia, with no documentation of psychotic disturbance, mood disorder, or depression in their health record. Resident #43 was also prescribed Quetiapine for unspecified dementia without any documented diagnosis of psychotic or mood disturbances. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Corporate RN acknowledged the need to consult with the pharmacy consultant to verify if dementia was an appropriate diagnosis for antipsychotic medication use. The pharmacy consultant confirmed that dementia alone was not an appropriate diagnosis for the use of antipsychotic medications.
Failure to Complete and Submit Discharge Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that resident assessments for discharge were completed and submitted to CMS for two residents who were reviewed for resident assessments. Resident #68, who was admitted with acute and chronic respiratory failure, diabetes type II, and congestive heart failure, was transferred to the hospital and expired there. A review of the assessment log revealed that a discharge assessment had not been completed or submitted for this resident. MDS Coordinator #1 acknowledged that the discharge assessment was missing because it was an unplanned discharge and was not noted on their calendar. Similarly, Resident #63, admitted with malignant neoplasm of the cervix, chronic kidney disease stage III, and type II diabetes, was discharged to the hospital. The assessment log showed that a discharge assessment for this resident was also not completed or submitted in a timely manner. MDS Coordinator #1 admitted to forgetting to enter the discharge assessment into the system due to the unplanned nature of the hospital discharge.
Failure to Ensure RN Certification of Resident Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper coordination and certification of resident assessments for four out of eleven sampled residents. Specifically, the electronic clinical records for these residents were missing quarterly assessments due to the absence of a required RN signature. One resident's assessment was rejected due to a mood miscalculation and needed to be reopened by the RN for correction. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the quarterly assessments required an RN's signature before submission and mentioned sending emails to the RN for signatures and when assessments needed reopening for corrections.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 113 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Owasso
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequoyah Pointe Living Center | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| The Highlands At Owasso | 1.6 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 1 |
| Rolling Hills Care Center | 7.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 2 | 0 |
| North County Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation | 7.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Green Country Care Center | 7.5 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Baptist Village Of Owasso.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.