Below average — CMS composite of the measures below.
A standard survey is most likely before around August 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Superior Manor Of Festus, Llc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple diagnoses was verbally and physically abused by a dietary staff member during a smoke break. The staff member used derogatory language and excessive force on the resident's wheelchair, violating the facility's abuse policy. Witnesses confirmed the incident, and the staff member was removed from the facility.
The facility failed to check the NA Registry for five employees before hiring, as required by policy, potentially compromising resident safety. The Administrator confirmed that these checks should occur before hiring and quarterly thereafter.
The facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, with surveyors noting persistent foul odors, damaged and dirty rooms, and inadequate housekeeping and maintenance practices. Housekeeping staff reported supply shortages and reduced hours, while nursing staff were uncertain about the maintenance of oxygen concentrators.
The facility failed to ensure that two CNAs received the required 12 hours of annual training. The facility assessment had not been updated since 2022, and there was no documentation of in-services related to the facility assessment and annual review. Both CNAs confirmed they had not received training on critical topics such as abuse/neglect, Alzheimer's, dementia, or behavioral health.
The facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, leading to potential cross-contamination and food-borne illness risks. Observations revealed issues such as unlabeled and undated food items, improper hygiene practices by dietary staff, and a lack of cleanliness in the kitchen. Interviews confirmed these deficiencies, with the Dietary Manager admitting to the kitchen's poor state and the Administrator acknowledging unmet standards.
The facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was complete and reviewed annually. The assessment, dated 08/30/22, showed a census of only two residents, which did not reflect the current census of 49 residents. Additionally, the assessment was not updated to reflect the current resident needs and was not reviewed annually. There was no documentation that the QAA and QAPI committee reviewed the facility assessment. The Administrator acknowledged that the facility assessment should reflect the resident population and their needs and be updated annually.
The facility failed to develop a QAPI Plan, which is essential for guiding efforts in maintaining and improving care and services. The facility census was 49. The Regional Nurse could not find any documentation of a QAPI Plan, and the Administrator expected the facility to implement such a program with policies and procedures for data collection and monitoring.
The facility failed to ensure the QAA/QAPI committee developed and implemented an appropriate plan of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. The facility did not provide a policy for a QAPI Plan or PIPs, and there was no documentation of maintaining the required documentation for a QAPI plan or PIPs. The Regional Nurse and Administrator confirmed the absence of a QAPI Plan and PIPs.
The facility failed to maintain quarterly QAPI committee meetings with the required members. The facility did not provide any policy or documentation related to QAPI, and there was no evidence of the required quarterly QAA meetings. Interviews with the Regional Nurse and Administrator confirmed the lack of QAPI activities.
The facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices, including improper glove changes, inadequate cleaning of a glucometer, lack of TB testing, and insufficient Legionella monitoring. An RN used soiled gloves for multiple tasks, and an ice scoop was improperly sanitized after falling on the floor.
The facility failed to ensure that the Infection Preventionist (IP) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, potentially affecting all 49 residents. The RN performing IP duties could not provide certification, and the Administrator and DON acknowledged the deficiency.
The facility failed to provide behavioral health training for nine staff members hired in the last year, despite having residents with significant behavioral health diagnoses. Interviews and record reviews confirmed the lack of training, and the Administrator and DON acknowledged the deficiency.
The facility failed to ensure resident funds were placed in a separate account from the operating account and did not provide timely refunds. One resident could not access funds for personal items, and housekeepers had to use personal money to assist. The facility also did not keep Medicaid resident funds over $50 in an interest-bearing account, and there were discrepancies in petty cash balances.
The facility failed to manage resident trust fund accounts according to proper accounting principles, including not reconciling accounts monthly, not maintaining accurate transaction records, and not providing quarterly statements. Additionally, resident petty cash was commingled with facility petty cash, and funds were transferred without proper documentation.
The facility failed to notify a resident when their trust account balance reached $200 less than the SSI resource limit. The Temporary Administrator/Business Office Manager admitted to not monitoring or notifying residents about their account balances, leading to a deficiency in compliance with facility policies.
The facility failed to maintain a sufficient surety bond to protect resident funds, with an average monthly balance of $11,894.63 and a bond of only $1,000.00, insufficient by $30,500.00. The Temporary Administrator/Business Office Manager was unsure about the correct method for determining the bond amount.
The facility failed to complete comprehensive MDS assessments within the required time frames for multiple residents. The assessments and CAAs were not completed within 14 days of admission, as mandated by federal regulations. The MDS Coordinator and Administrator acknowledged the delays and the absence of a current MDS Coordinator.
The facility failed to complete quarterly MDS assessments within the required 92-day timeframe for seven residents. The new MDS Coordinator found the assessments significantly behind schedule and had to code many items as not assessed due to missing information. The Administrator acknowledged the issue and stated that there was currently no MDS Coordinator for the facility.
The facility failed to transmit MDS assessments within the required 14-day period for ten residents, leading to significant delays in compliance with state and federal regulations. Staff interviews revealed that the MDS Coordinator position had been inadequately staffed, contributing to the backlog.
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for four residents, resulting in unaddressed CAAs and improper use of restraints. Diagnoses included diabetes, GERD, schizophrenia, dementia, and more, but care plans did not reflect these conditions accurately.
The facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of its 49 residents, many of whom had complex medical and mental health diagnoses. The outdated facility assessment and reduced staffing levels led to long wait times for assistance, delayed medication administration, and insufficient care during the night. Both residents and staff expressed concerns about safety and quality of care.
The facility failed to implement procedures to ensure medications were accurately administered, documented, not expired, and reconciled for the Emergency Medication Kit (E-Kit). Observations revealed that the E-Kit was not locked with the required tags, and numerous medications were expired. Interviews with staff and pharmacy consultants confirmed that the facility did not have a process in place for monitoring and discarding expired medications, leading to several unaccounted-for narcotic medications.
The facility failed to securely store medications and monitor expired medications. A resident was found to have multiple pills on the bedside table without a physician's order for self-administration. Additionally, medication carts were frequently left unlocked and unattended, and expired medications were found in both the medication carts and storage room.
The facility failed to provide and document that residents received or declined appropriate immunizations for influenza and pneumonia. Five residents had no records indicating they were informed about or received the vaccinations, nor were there any records of refusals or contraindications. Interviews with the ADON and DON confirmed the lack of documentation and administration of the vaccines.
The facility failed to provide a dining room large enough to accommodate all residents, leading to congestion and insufficient seating, especially for those in wheelchairs. Staff and residents reported issues with space, and some residents had to sit in non-dining areas. Despite these concerns, the administration believed the dining area was adequate.
The facility failed to provide SNF ABN and NOMNC forms to two residents discharged from Medicare Part A services with benefit days remaining. Staff interviews revealed a lack of clarity and responsibility regarding the issuance of these forms, and the facility did not have a policy in place for this process.
The facility failed to assess and document the use of a lap tray for a resident, leading to its use as a physical restraint without appropriate justification or consent. The resident, with severe cognitive impairment and hemiparesis, was observed multiple times unable to remove the lap tray. The facility did not follow its policies on restraint assessment, documentation, and consent.
The facility failed to notify residents and/or their representatives in writing of transfers or discharges to a hospital, including the reasons for the transfer, and did not notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. This deficiency was identified for multiple residents, and the Director of Nursing acknowledged the lack of required documentation.
The facility failed to inform residents and/or their legal representatives in writing of their bed hold policy during hospital transfers. Interviews revealed that the policy was communicated verbally, and no written documentation was provided, leading to the identified deficiency.
The facility failed to document accurate MDS assessments for five residents, leading to omissions and inaccuracies in diagnoses and treatments. The MDS Coordinator admitted to coding items as not assessed due to a backlog and lack of information.
The facility failed to provide a Level I PASARR for two residents admitted with mental health and intellectual disorder diagnoses. The DON confirmed the absence of PASARR documentation and stated that all residents should be screened before admission, especially those transferred from a closed facility.
The facility failed to implement baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission for five residents with various medical conditions. The baseline care plans were either not completed on time or were missing, and there was no documentation that the residents or their representatives received a written summary. Interviews revealed a lack of clarity and training on the requirements for new admissions.
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans within the required timeframe for six residents with various diagnoses, leading to incomplete assessments and care plans. The MDS and care plan coordinator reported significant delays, and the Administrator and DON confirmed the expectation for timely updates.
The facility failed to follow physician's orders for six residents, leading to various deficiencies in care. Issues included incorrect administration of nutritional supplements, failure to provide prescribed medications, lack of necessary suctioning, and improper use of wound vac equipment. The deficiencies were acknowledged by the DON and Administrator.
The facility failed to complete a comprehensive discharge summary for a resident. The policy requires a detailed discharge summary to be written and reviewed with the resident and family. However, for one resident, there was no documentation of a discharge summary. Interviews with the DON and ADON confirmed the absence of the discharge summary and the failure to chart the recapitulation of stay.
A facility failed to provide necessary care for a resident receiving chemotherapy, resulting in a malfunctioning infusion pump and medication leakage. Staff lacked training on managing chemotherapy and did not communicate with the infusion center, leading to potential harm to the resident.
The facility failed to ensure that the RD's recommendations for a resident's weight loss were communicated to the physician, resulting in inadequate nutritional management. The resident experienced significant weight fluctuations, and despite the RD's recommendations for interventions, these were not implemented. The DON acknowledged the communication gap and the lack of established protocols to address the issue.
The facility failed to ensure that residents diagnosed with dementia had personalized care plans to promote their highest level of functioning and psychosocial needs. Three residents with dementia did not have care plans addressing their condition, and observations showed them either unresponsive or inactive. Interviews revealed that the facility lacked a dementia policy and that MDS assessments were significantly behind schedule.
The facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for two residents on psychotropic medications, with no documentation of GDR attempts or contraindications. Observations showed one resident often unresponsive in bed and another pacing the hall and wearing the same suit for consecutive days. Interviews confirmed that GDRs should be attempted or documented as contraindicated, but this was not done.
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of five percent or less, resulting in a 14.29% error rate. Two residents experienced improper medication administration, including the crushing of medications that should not be crushed and issues with g-tube administration. Staff interviews revealed a lack of training and resources, contributing to the errors.
The facility failed to provide appealing alternative meal options of similar nutritive value to residents who chose not to eat the food initially served. Observations and interviews revealed that residents could only get a sandwich or cereal if they did not like the meal served, and the facility's rotating menu did not include alternative options.
The facility failed to ensure dumpsters were closed and maintained to keep pests out and garbage contained. Observations showed open dumpster lids with visible garbage. Staff interviews revealed that dumpsters were not emptied frequently enough, leading to overfilled dumpsters that could not be closed properly. The Administrator and DON confirmed that they expected the lids to be closed after trash disposal.
The facility failed to ensure that the COVID-19 vaccination was offered, administered, or refused by three residents. Medical records showed no documentation of education regarding the COVID-19 vaccination, nor any record of the vaccine being provided or refused. Interviews with the DON and Administrator confirmed the lack of documentation and the absence of a COVID-19 vaccination policy.
The facility failed to provide a safe environment by allowing items to be stored on overbed light fixtures in three rooms, creating a hazard of items potentially falling on residents. Observations included various items such as bottles, books, cards, and a foam cup placed on the light fixtures. The DON and Administrator acknowledged the potential hazard, and no policy for overbed lighting safety was provided.
The facility failed to ensure an effective training program for all new and existing staff members. The facility assessment had not been reviewed since 2022, and there was no evidence of a training schedule or tracking system. Interviews with the Administrator and DON revealed a lack of awareness regarding required training and tracking responsibilities.
The facility failed to provide required abuse and neglect training for five CNAs and one CMT hired in the last year. Employee files lacked documentation of this training, and staff interviews confirmed the absence of such training. The Administrator and DON acknowledged the deficiency and were compiling a list of necessary in-services and training.
The facility failed to provide the required twelve hours of annual in-service education and annual competencies in abuse prevention and dementia care for two CNAs. CNA K and CNA R did not receive the necessary training, and the Administrator and DON acknowledged the deficiency, stating that they were compiling a list of required in-services and training.
Verbal and Physical Abuse by Staff Member
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from verbal abuse by a staff member, resulting in a deficiency. The incident involved a resident who was cognitively intact and had multiple diagnoses, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, traumatic brain dysfunction, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus II. The resident became upset when a dietary staff member did not provide a cigarette quickly enough during a smoke break, leading to a verbal altercation. The facility's administrator witnessed the altercation and instructed the staff member to walk away. However, the staff member returned and continued the argument, using excessive force to jerk the resident's wheelchair. Witnesses, including CNAs, reported that the staff member used derogatory language and physically manipulated the resident's wheelchair in a rough manner. The staff member's actions were in direct violation of the facility's abuse policy, which prohibits verbal and physical abuse. The facility's investigation confirmed the staff member's inappropriate behavior, and the administrator took immediate action by removing the staff member from the facility. The staff member had previously signed the facility's abuse inservice policy, indicating awareness of the rules against abuse. Despite this, the staff member engaged in behavior that compromised the resident's right to be free from abuse, leading to the deficiency finding.
Failure to Check NA Registry Before Hiring Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry was checked prior to hiring five employees, which included Dietary Staff A, a Registered Nurse (RN) F, an Activity Director G, a Housekeeping Supervisor H, and a Maintenance Supervisor I. This oversight was identified during an interview and record review, where it was found that there was no documentation indicating that the NA Registry was checked for these employees before their hire dates. The facility's policy, revised in January 2008, requires the Human Resources (HR) Director to conduct background investigations, including checking the NA Registry, to ensure applicants do not have a Federal Indicator for abuse or neglect. The Administrator confirmed during an interview that NA Registry checks should be completed on any new employee before they are hired and repeated quarterly. However, the personnel records for the five employees sampled showed no evidence of such checks being conducted prior to their employment. The facility's census at the time was 46, and the failure to adhere to the hiring policy potentially compromised the safety and well-being of the residents by not ensuring that employees were free from any history of abuse or neglect.
Facility Fails to Maintain Safe and Clean Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, as evidenced by multiple observations of unsanitary and unsafe conditions. Surveyors noted a persistent musty and foul odor of urine and fecal material in the 100 and 200 Halls. Numerous rooms had visible damage, including scratches and holes in the drywall, broken drawers, and hanging vent covers. Additionally, floors in several rooms and hallways were sticky and littered with food particles, dirt, and other debris. Specific rooms had strong urine smells, and one room had a small medication cup with an unidentified yellow liquid that remained unattended for several days. The courtyard was also found to be in disrepair, with broken furniture and numerous cigarette butts scattered around the area. An oxygen concentrator used for multiple residents was observed with significant debris and lint on its filters, indicating a lack of proper maintenance and cleaning. The facility's shower rooms were also found to be in poor condition, with dirt, debris, mold-like substances, and various items left unattended. The Resident Council Meeting Minutes from March 2024 revealed that residents had voiced concerns about inadequate room cleaning and unmade beds. Housekeeping staff reported that their hours had been cut, and they had experienced multiple instances of missed supply orders due to unpaid bills. This resulted in rationing supplies and an inability to adequately perform their duties. Housekeeping staff also mentioned that they were instructed by the owner to limit their cleaning tasks to sweeping and mopping, and to avoid using chemicals on painted floors due to a reaction with the paint. Interviews with housekeeping staff and the Administrator confirmed that the facility had been without laundry help for an extended period, leading to further strain on housekeeping duties. Nursing staff were expected to clean and maintain oxygen concentrators, but there was uncertainty about the frequency of these tasks. The Administrator stated that maintenance tasks were prioritized based on need and importance, but the overall condition of the facility indicated a lack of timely and effective maintenance.
Failure to Provide Required Annual Training for CNAs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs), identified as CNA K and CNA R, received the required 12 hours of annual training. The facility, which had a census of 49 residents, did not provide a policy regarding annual training. The facility assessment had not been reviewed since 2022, when the facility had only two residents. The assessment should have included staff competencies and annual training requirements on various topics such as abuse, neglect, exploitation, advance directives, behavioral health, communication, compliance and ethics, CPR, dementia care management, equipment and assistive device training, infection control, emergency preparedness, facility policies and procedures, resident rights, and assessing nutritional needs for individuals with mental illness, intellectual disability, or developmental delays. Review of CNA K's and CNA R's employee files showed no documentation of in-services related to the facility assessment and annual review. During interviews, both CNAs confirmed they had not received annual training on critical topics such as abuse/neglect, Alzheimer's, dementia, or behavioral health. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator acknowledged the lack of documentation and stated that they were in the process of compiling a list of necessary in-services and trainings. The Administrator also noted that the facility assessment should reflect the resident population and their needs, and that annual trainings should align with this assessment.
Facility Fails to Maintain Sanitary Food Storage and Handling Conditions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, which increased the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. Observations revealed multiple issues, including a significant buildup of frost/ice in the freezer, unlabeled and undated food items, and unwrapped vegetables directly on refrigerator shelves. The dry food storage room contained various items on the floor, scattered dirt and debris, and multiple unlabeled or undated food items. The kitchen itself was found to be in a state of disrepair, with grime buildup on equipment, debris on floors and surfaces, and improperly stored utensils and cookware. The dietary staff did not follow proper hygiene protocols, such as sanitizing hands or changing gloves between tasks, and wearing appropriate hair restraints. Observations showed staff handling food with soiled gloves, not covering their hair or beards properly, and leaving food uncovered while waiting to be served. Additionally, the facility lacked a policy for managing food brought in from outside, and there were no logs maintained for steam table temperatures for the past eleven months. Interviews with the Dietary Manager (DM) and other staff confirmed these deficiencies. The DM admitted to knowing the kitchen was dirty but cited a lack of time to clean it. The Administrator acknowledged the expectations for food storage, cleanliness, and staff hygiene but noted that these standards were not being met. The facility's failure to maintain sanitary conditions and proper food handling practices had the potential to affect all residents served by the kitchen.
Incomplete and Outdated Facility Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was complete and reviewed annually. The assessment, dated 08/30/22, showed a census of only two residents, which did not reflect the current census of 49 residents. Additionally, the assessment was not updated to reflect the current resident needs and was not reviewed annually. There was no documentation that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee reviewed the facility assessment. During an interview, the Administrator acknowledged that the facility assessment should reflect the resident population and their needs and be updated annually.
Failure to Develop a QAPI Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI), which is a written plan containing the process that will guide the facility's efforts in assuring care and services are maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continually improved. The facility census was 49. Review showed the facility did not have a QAPI plan containing the necessary policies and protocols describing how they will identify and correct their quality deficiencies, track and measure performance, and establish goals and thresholds for performance measurement. During an interview, the Regional Nurse was unable to find any documentation that the facility had a QAPI Plan and did not believe the facility had been doing anything related to QAPI. The Administrator also stated that she would expect the facility to implement a QAPI Program and Plan with policies and procedures for data collection and monitoring.
Failure to Implement QAPI Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance/Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAA/QAPI) committee developed and implemented an appropriate plan of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. The facility census was 49. The facility did not provide a policy for a QAPI Plan or Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs). Review showed no documentation that the facility maintained the minimum required documentation for a QAPI plan or PIPs. During an interview, the Regional Nurse was unable to find any documentation that the facility had a QAPI Plan or PIPs in place and did not believe the facility had been doing anything related to QAPI. The Administrator also stated that she would expect the facility to have a QAPI Plan in place and implement PIPs to address identified issues.
Failure to Maintain Quarterly QAPI Meetings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain quarterly Quality Assurance and Improvement Program (QAPI) committee meetings with the required members. The facility census was 49. The facility did not provide a policy or any documentation related to QAPI. Review showed no documentation that the facility maintained the minimum required quarterly QAA meetings with the required members. During an interview, the Regional Nurse stated that he/she was unable to find any documentation that the facility had any QAPI meetings and did not believe the facility had been doing anything related to QAPI. The Administrator also stated that she would expect the facility to have QAPI meetings at least quarterly with the required members present.
Infection Control Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices in several instances. During wound care for a resident, an RN used soiled gloves to handle various items, including wound dressings, a spray bottle, and personal items like a cell phone. The RN did not change gloves or wash hands between tasks, leading to potential cross-contamination. The RN also failed to use barriers under the resident's legs and did not clean scissors between uses, further compromising infection control standards. In another instance, the facility did not properly clean and disinfect a glucometer between resident uses. An RN cleaned the glucometer for only five seconds instead of the recommended 30 seconds to a minute, and did not allow it to air dry for the required time. Additionally, the RN did not wash hands before and after checking blood sugar levels and changing gloves, which is against the facility's policy. The facility also failed to implement a risk management process for Legionella disease and did not have a water management program in place. There was no documentation of TB testing or screening for two residents, and the facility lacked sufficient tuberculin for testing. Furthermore, an ice scoop that had fallen on the floor was rinsed with water and placed back into the clean ice container without proper sanitization, posing a risk of contamination.
Lack of Specialized Training for Infection Preventionist
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that at least one person had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control for the Infection Preventionist (IP) position. This deficiency had the potential to affect all 49 residents in the facility. The facility's policy outlined that the Infection Control Nurse should stay informed of relevant health regulations, direct and maintain an infection control program, contribute to inservices and staff meetings, monitor immunizations, and act as the facility's IP. However, the facility did not provide documentation for any staff members who had completed the specialized training required for the IP position. During an interview, a Registered Nurse (RN) who was performing the IP duties stated that they thought the certification had been completed but did not have the certificate to prove it. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that they would expect to have an IP with the appropriate qualifications and certification, but acknowledged that the RN currently holding the IP position did not have the necessary documentation to confirm their specialized training.
Failure to Provide Behavioral Health Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide behavioral health training for nine out of nine sampled staff hired in the last year, despite having a census of 49 residents, many of whom had significant behavioral health diagnoses. The medical diagnoses of the residents included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, schizoaffective disorder, history of suicide attempts or suicidal ideations, agoraphobia, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, personality disorders, PTSD, psychosis, and disruptive mood dysregulation disorder. The lack of behavioral health training was confirmed through interviews and record reviews, which showed no documentation of such training in the employee files of the sampled staff. During interviews, several staff members, including a Certified Medication Technician (CMT) and multiple Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), confirmed that they had not received any behavioral health training since being employed at the facility. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the deficiency, stating that they were in the process of compiling a list of in-services and training that needed to be done, as it had not been completed. The facility also failed to provide a policy regarding behavioral health training, further highlighting the gap in compliance with regulatory requirements.
Failure to Properly Manage Resident Funds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure resident funds were placed in an account separate from the facility operating account and did not provide residents with refunds of their personal funds in a timely manner. This affected six residents, with amounts ranging from $35 to $3,685 held in the operating account. Additionally, one resident reported not being able to access their funds to purchase personal items and was only given partial amounts when requesting money. Housekeepers had to use their personal money to purchase underwear for this resident due to a lack of resident trust petty cash. The facility's process for accessing funds was limited to weekdays and required approval, causing delays and inconvenience for residents needing money during evenings or weekends. The facility also failed to keep resident funds over $50 for Medicaid recipients in an interest-bearing account, as evidenced by one resident having $200 in petty cash, which was $150 more than allowed. The facility's bank statements showed that interest was not accrued in the resident trust account. The Temporary Administrator/Business Office Manager was unaware of how interest was paid to each resident and could not explain discrepancies in the petty cash balance. These deficiencies indicate a lack of proper management and oversight of resident funds, potentially affecting all residents whose funds were managed by the facility.
Failure to Properly Manage Resident Trust Fund Accounts
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust fund account was managed in accordance with proper accounting principles. Specifically, the facility did not reconcile the resident trust fund account monthly, did not maintain accurate accounting records for each transaction, and failed to provide quarterly resident trust statements. Additionally, the facility commingled resident petty cash with facility petty cash. These deficiencies affected 46 residents out of a census of 49. The facility's bank statements from February 2023 through March 2024 showed no documentation of reconciliations, and the Owner confirmed that reconciliations were not completed. The Temporary Administrator/Business Office Manager admitted to balancing the books only as needed and was unaware of the status of previous petty cash logs or the reasons for discrepancies in the petty cash balance. Further, the facility did not provide quarterly reports of transactions to residents as required. The Owner and the Temporary Administrator/Business Office Manager both confirmed that resident trust statements were not provided. Additionally, facility staff transferred resident funds from the resident petty cash to the facility petty cash box on at least two occasions, totaling $900, without proper documentation or receipts. The Temporary Administrator/Business Office Manager acknowledged these transfers but could not provide a valid reason or documentation for them.
Failure to Notify Resident of Trust Account Balance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify a resident when their trust account balance reached $200 less than the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource limit. Specifically, Resident #22's account balance was consistently above the threshold from 02/15/24 through 04/04/24, but no notification was provided. The facility managed funds for 46 out of 49 residents, indicating a systemic issue in monitoring and notifying residents about their account balances. During interviews, the Temporary Administrator/Business Office Manager admitted that they were supposed to write a list of residents needing notification for spend-down but had not done so. The manager also revealed that they did not have access to view resident account balances until recently and that no resident notices had been sent out. This lack of action and oversight led to the deficiency in notifying Resident #22 about their account balance, as required by the facility's policies and regulations.
Insufficient Surety Bond for Resident Funds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a surety bond sufficient to ensure the protection of resident funds. The facility's Resident Trust Bank Statements for the period from April 2023 through March 2024 showed an average monthly balance of $11,894.63, and the Accounts Receivable Aging Report dated April 8, 2024, indicated a balance of resident funds amounting to $9,577.14. However, the Department of Health and Senior Services approved bond list revealed that the facility only had a $1,000.00 approved bond, which was insufficient by $30,500.00. During interviews, the Temporary Administrator/Business Office Manager admitted to being unsure about the correct method for determining the bond amount and acknowledged that the bond should be sufficient to cover the resident funds.
Failure to Complete Timely MDS Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required time frames for 10 residents out of 13 sampled residents and two additional residents outside the sample. The MDS assessments and Care Area Assessments (CAAs) were not completed within 14 days of admission as mandated by federal regulations. This deficiency was observed in the medical records of residents who were admitted on various dates, with the MDS and CAA completion dates significantly delayed beyond the required timeframe. The facility's policy, as outlined in the MDS Coordinator's job description, mandates tracking and scheduling required resident assessments, completing all MDS assessments and CAAs, and ensuring compliance with state and federal requirements. However, the review of the medical records showed that none of the sampled residents had their comprehensive admission MDS assessments and CAAs completed within the stipulated 14 days of admission. This lapse in timely assessment was confirmed through interviews with the MDS Coordinator and the facility Administrator. During interviews, the MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the MDS assessments were significantly behind schedule when they started in March 2024. The Coordinator had to code many items as not assessed due to missing information and had to rely on assistance from nursing staff and the Social Services Designee to complete the assessments. The Administrator confirmed the expectation for timely and accurate MDS assessments per the RAI Manual and acknowledged the absence of a current MDS Coordinator for the facility.
Failure to Complete Quarterly MDS Assessments Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required 92-day timeframe for seven residents out of 13 sampled residents. The residents affected were identified as Residents #2, #18, #32, #33, #38, #40, and #42. The review of the facility's policy and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual indicated that the MDS assessments were not completed timely, which is a requirement to monitor residents' status and ensure quality care. Specific instances included Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment being in progress beyond the 92-day limit, and similar delays were noted for the other residents mentioned. Interviews with the MDS Coordinator and the Administrator revealed that the MDS assessments were significantly behind schedule when the new MDS Coordinator started in March 2024. The MDS Coordinator had to code many items as not assessed due to missing information and required assistance from nursing staff and the Social Services Designee to complete the assessments. The Administrator acknowledged the issue and stated that there was currently no MDS Coordinator for the facility, which contributed to the delay in completing the assessments as per the RAI Manual requirements.
Failure to Transmit MDS Assessments Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to electronically transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner for ten residents out of a sample of thirteen. The MDS assessments, which are federally mandated, were not transmitted within the required 14-day period for various types of assessments, including comprehensive admission assessments, quarterly assessments, and entry tracking records. This failure was observed in the records of Residents #6, #16, #18, #32, #33, #35, #36, #38, #40, and #42. The facility's policy mandates that these assessments be completed and transmitted in compliance with state and federal regulations, but this was not adhered to in multiple instances. For example, Resident #6 had a discharge-return anticipated MDS completed on 02/01/24 but was not transmitted until 03/15/24, well beyond the 14-day requirement. Similarly, Resident #18 had multiple instances of delayed transmissions, including an entry MDS tracking record dated 11/01/22 that was not transmitted until 05/18/23. These delays were consistent across other residents as well, indicating a systemic issue within the facility's process for handling MDS assessments. Interviews with staff revealed that the MDS Coordinator position had been vacant or inadequately staffed, contributing to the backlog. RN AG, who served as the MDS Coordinator from 03/01/24 to 04/10/24, acknowledged that the assessments were significantly behind schedule when they started. The Administrator also confirmed awareness of the issue, noting that the previous MDS Coordinator's services had been paused and that there was currently no MDS Coordinator for the facility.
Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans with specific interventions to meet individual needs for four residents. Resident #1's medical record showed diagnoses of diabetes and GERD, with triggered CAAs for functional abilities, urinary incontinence, nutritional status, and pressure ulcer/injury, but the care plan did not address these CAAs. Resident #6 had diagnoses of schizophrenia, GERD, and hyperlipidemia, with triggered CAAs for cognitive loss/dementia, functional abilities, urinary incontinence, falls, fluid maintenance, psychotropic drug use, and pain, but the care plan only addressed functional performance without listing any goals or other CAAs. Resident #16, diagnosed with dementia, anxiety disorder, hemiparesis, and hemiplegia following a stroke, had a comprehensive care plan that did not address the use of a lap tray as a restraint. Observations showed the resident frequently restrained by the tray, which the resident was unable to remove. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the lap tray was considered a restraint and should only be used during meals. Resident #29, diagnosed with dementia with behavioral disturbance, altered mental status, and pain, had an admission MDS assessment that triggered CAAs for dementia, urinary incontinence, falls, pressure ulcer, and psychotropic drug use, but there was no comprehensive care plan in place. Interviews with staff revealed that the MDS and care plans were significantly behind or incomplete, affecting the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the care plans. The MDS Coordinator and Social Services Designee were responsible for creating and revising the care plans, but the care plans did not accurately reflect the residents' conditions. The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged the need for appropriate interventions and activities for dementia residents, but these were not implemented in the care plans reviewed.
Insufficient Nursing Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure there was a sufficient number of nursing personnel to provide care and respond to each resident's basic and individual needs. The facility's assessment had not been reviewed since 2022 when the facility had only two residents, and the staffing levels were based on that outdated assessment. The facility's census had increased to 49 residents, many of whom had complex medical and mental health diagnoses requiring significant care and attention. Despite this, the facility often operated with only one RN and one CNA during night shifts, which was insufficient to meet the residents' needs, especially for those requiring assistance with transfers and those with behavioral issues. Interviews with residents and staff revealed that the lack of adequate staffing led to long wait times for assistance, delayed medication administration, and insufficient care during the night. Residents reported waiting up to an hour for call lights to be answered and receiving their medications late. Staff members expressed concerns about the safety and quality of care, noting that it was dangerous to have only two staff members in the building at night, especially in the event of a medical emergency. Housekeeping staff also reported being unable to keep up with cleaning and laundry due to reduced hours and staffing cuts. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator acknowledged the staffing issues and stated that the facility should have a minimum of two nurses and three CNAs during the day shift and one nurse and two CNAs during the night shift for a census over 40. However, the facility's reliance on agency staff and the need for owner approval for staffing changes further complicated the situation. The deficiency in staffing levels had a significant impact on the quality of care provided to the residents, as evidenced by the numerous complaints and observations documented in the report.
Failure to Implement Medication Management Procedures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement procedures to ensure medications were accurately administered, documented, not expired, and reconciled for the Emergency Medication Kit (E-Kit). The facility's policy required that emergency medications be logged, monitored, and replaced as needed, but these procedures were not followed. Observations revealed that the E-Kit was not locked with the required tags, and there were no E-Kit removal or verification forms available. Additionally, numerous medications in the E-Kit were found to be expired, including various pain medications, antibiotics, and other essential drugs. During an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) acknowledged that they were new to the facility and had only been there for two weeks. They admitted that the facility did not appear to have a process in place for monitoring and discarding expired medications. Further observations showed that a Registered Nurse (RN) removed a pain medication from the E-Kit without filling out the required form, and the Administrator instructed the DON to log it on the supply log instead. This indicated a lack of adherence to the facility's policies and procedures for medication management. Interviews with the Pharmacy Consultant and Pharmacy RN confirmed that the facility had not received a new E-Kit since the initial delivery and that the E-Kit was not being checked or replenished as required. The Pharmacy Consultant stated that the facility should check the E-Kit weekly, but this was not being done. As a result, several narcotic medications were unaccounted for, including temazepam, oxycodone, hydrocodone/acetaminophen, clonazepam, and alprazolam. The Administrator and DON admitted that there was no way to reconcile when and to whom these narcotic medications were administered, highlighting a significant deficiency in the facility's medication management practices.
Failure to Securely Store Medications and Monitor Expired Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were securely stored in accordance with currently accepted practices and facility policy. Specifically, the facility did not have a physician's order for one resident to keep and self-administer medications at the bedside. Observations showed that the resident had multiple pills on the bedside table on several occasions, and the resident confirmed that they took the medications without staff supervision. The facility policy requires a physician's order and an assessment to determine if a resident is capable of self-administering medications safely, which was not followed in this case. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that medication carts and medication rooms were free from expired medications. Observations revealed that medication carts were frequently left unlocked and unattended, and expired medications were found in both the medication carts and the medication storage room. Specific expired medications included Hepatitis A and B vaccines, a Ventolin HFA inhaler, liquid bandage, and loperamide hydrochloride tablets. The facility policy mandates that medications be monitored by the unit nurse, charge nurse, and consultant pharmacist to ensure they are not expired, contaminated, or unusable, which was not adhered to. Interviews with staff, including the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator, confirmed that they expected medication carts to be locked when not in use and for expired medications to be discarded per facility policy. However, the observations and interviews indicated that these expectations were not met, leading to the deficiencies noted in the report.
Failure to Document and Administer Influenza and Pneumonia Vaccinations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide and document that residents received or declined appropriate immunizations for influenza and pneumonia. This deficiency was identified for five residents out of a sample of five, with a facility census of 49. The facility's policies for influenza and pneumonia vaccinations required documentation of education, administration, or refusal of the vaccines, as well as monitoring by the Infection Control (IC) Nurse. However, the medical records for the sampled residents showed no documentation of education, administration, or refusal of the vaccines. Specifically, Residents #1, #8, #26, #35, and #102 had no records indicating they were informed about or received the influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations, nor were there any records of refusals or contraindications noted. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the lack of documentation and administration of the vaccines. The ADON mentioned that the pneumonia vaccine had not been given at the facility, while the DON stated that they were waiting for the pneumonia vaccine to arrive, as it required approval from the owner due to its cost. Both the Administrator and the DON acknowledged that they would expect vaccinations to be given per CDC guidelines and that declinations should be signed if refused, but this was not reflected in the residents' records.
Inadequate Dining Room Space
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a dining room large enough to accommodate all residents, affecting one resident out of 13 sampled and two additional residents outside the sample, with the potential to affect all 49 residents. Observations showed that several residents had to leave the dining area before others could be brought in to eat, and some residents had to sit in areas not designated for dining due to lack of space. The dining room had nine round tables and four rectangle tables with twenty-seven chairs, which were insufficient for the number of residents, especially those in wheelchairs. Interviews with various staff members, including the Dietary Manager, Certified Nurse Aides, Certified Medication Technicians, and Housekeeping Staff, confirmed that the dining room was congested and not large enough to accommodate all residents at mealtimes. Residents expressed fear of not having a place to sit if they left the dining room, indicating the inadequacy of the space. Despite these observations and staff feedback, the Administrator and Director of Nursing believed the dining area was sufficient for the residents to eat together.
Failure to Provide Required Medicare Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to two residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services with benefit days remaining. Resident #203 was discharged from Medicare Part A services on 11/23/23 and remained in the facility without receiving the required notices. Similarly, Resident #204 was discharged from Medicare Part A services on 10/04/23 and also remained in the facility without receiving the necessary documentation. The facility did not have a policy for issuing SNF ABN or NOMNC forms, and staff were unable to locate these forms when searched for by the Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) and other managerial/office staff. Interviews with various staff members, including the Social Services Designee (SSD), Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Regional Director of Therapy, revealed a lack of clarity and responsibility regarding the issuance of SNF ABN and NOMNC forms. The SSD admitted to not documenting these forms and was unsure who was responsible for this task. The Administrator and DON expected the forms to be completed and signed by the resident or their representative, but this was not done. The Regional Director of Therapy confirmed that both residents were discharged from Medicare Part A services with benefit days remaining, having reached their maximum potential, and that the discharges were not resident-initiated.
Failure to Properly Assess and Document Lap Tray Use as Restraint
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly assess and document the use of a lap tray for a resident, leading to its use as a physical restraint without appropriate justification or consent. The facility did not assess whether the lap tray was a restraint, did not document it in the care plan, and did not identify a medical symptom that supported its use. Additionally, there was no documentation of the least restrictive use for the lap tray or ongoing re-evaluation for its necessity. The resident involved had severe cognitive impairment, hemiparesis, and hemiplegia following a stroke, and was observed multiple times unable to remove the lap tray, indicating it was indeed a restraint. The facility's policies on restraints require a thorough assessment, documentation of alternatives tried, informed consent, and ongoing re-evaluation, none of which were followed in this case. The resident's medical record lacked an assessment for the lap tray, documentation of alternatives, and consent for its use. The resident's care plan also did not address the lap tray or restraint use. Observations showed the resident frequently had the lap tray attached and was unable to remove it, contradicting the facility's policy that the tray should only be used during meals. Interviews with the DON and the Administrator confirmed that they were aware of the requirements for restraint use, including documentation and consent, but these were not followed. The Regional Director of Therapy noted that different chairs had been tried for the resident, but the resident was non-compliant with the plan of treatment. Despite this, the facility did not follow its own policies to ensure the resident's safety and compliance with restraint regulations.
Failure to Notify Residents and Ombudsman of Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify residents and/or their representatives in writing of transfers or discharges to a hospital, including the reasons for the transfer, and did not notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. This deficiency was identified for five residents out of 13 sampled residents and one resident outside the sample. Specifically, the medical records of Residents #6, #16, #18, #35, #36, and #43 showed multiple instances of hospital transfers without the required written notifications to the residents, their representatives, or the Ombudsman. During interviews, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the lack of documentation for transfer and bed hold notifications. The Administrator and DON confirmed that they would expect staff to notify the resident or resident representative in writing of the reason for transfer and to send a copy to the Ombudsman, but this was not being done. The facility's policy on discharges, which was undated, indicated that the Social Services department was responsible for notifying the resident and family in accordance with federal regulations, but this policy was not being followed in practice.
Failure to Provide Written Bed Hold Policy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to inform residents and/or their legal representatives in writing of their bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital. This deficiency was identified for four residents within the sample and one resident outside the sample. Specifically, Residents #6, #16, #35, #36, and #43 were transferred to the hospital on multiple occasions, but there was no documentation indicating that they or their representatives were informed in writing about the facility's bed hold policy during these transfers. Interviews with the facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the facility did not provide written bed hold policies to residents or their representatives. The Administrator admitted that the policy was communicated verbally, while the DON confirmed the absence of any written documentation regarding bed hold policies. Despite the expectation that staff should inform residents or their representatives in writing, this practice was not followed, leading to the identified deficiency.
Inaccurate MDS Documentation for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to document accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for five residents out of a sample of 13. Resident #6's MDS entry tracking record inaccurately indicated that the resident entered from a skilled nursing facility instead of a hospital upon readmission. Additionally, the resident's admission MDS failed to reflect a serious mental illness diagnosis, despite a Level II PASARR indicating such a condition. Resident #16's quarterly MDS assessment did not document the use of a wheelchair with a lap tray, which the Director of Nursing confirmed was considered a restraint. Resident #18's quarterly MDS assessment omitted several diagnoses, including GERD, aphasia, and cerebrovascular disease, and failed to document the administration of antibiotics, despite medical records indicating these conditions and treatments. Resident #36's quarterly MDS assessment did not include diagnoses of pulmonary embolism and GERD, even though the resident had physician orders for medications to treat GERD. Similarly, Resident #42's quarterly MDS assessment failed to document a GERD diagnosis and incorrectly included a diagnosis of pneumonia. During an interview, the MDS Coordinator admitted that the MDS assessments were significantly behind schedule when they started in March 2024. Due to the backlog, the coordinator had to code many items as not assessed because the necessary information was unavailable. The coordinator also mentioned that nursing staff and the Social Services Designee assisted with interviews to complete the assessments as much as possible, following the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual.
Failure to Provide PASARR Screening
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for two residents out of 13 sampled residents. Resident #2, who was admitted with diagnoses of major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and schizophrenia, did not have a Level I PASARR in their medical record. Similarly, Resident #26, admitted with diagnoses of schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, and dementia, also lacked a Level I PASARR. During an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the absence of PASARR documentation for these residents and stated that all residents should be screened before admission. These two residents had been admitted from a previous facility that closed emergently and should have been screened if the appropriate paperwork was not located after admission.
Failure to Implement Baseline Care Plans Within 48 Hours of Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for five residents out of 13 sampled residents. These residents had various medical conditions, including diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), severe protein-calorie malnutrition, aphasia, bipolar disorder, cerebrovascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), seizures, anemia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, gastrostomy status, insomnia, multiple pressure ulcers, and mild intellectual disabilities. The baseline care plans were either not completed within the required timeframe or were missing entirely, and there was no documentation that the residents or their representatives received a written summary of the baseline care plans. This deficiency was identified through interviews and record reviews conducted by the surveyors, who noted that the nursing staff and the Director of Nursing (DON) were responsible for completing the care plans, but there was a lack of clarity and training on the requirements. During interviews, a Registered Nurse (RN) admitted to not receiving adequate orientation and being unsure of the requirements for new admissions. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that she expected baseline care plans to be completed within 48 hours of admission, while the Administrator believed they should be completed within 10 days but preferred within three days. The Administrator was unaware that baseline care plans should be completed within 48 hours, signed by the resident or their representative, and available for review for all new admissions. The facility also failed to provide a policy related to baseline care plans, contributing to the deficiency in meeting the residents' immediate needs upon admission.
Failure to Develop Timely Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans within seven days after the completion of the comprehensive assessment and no more than 21 days after admission for six residents out of 13 sampled residents. The residents involved had various diagnoses, including severe protein-calorie malnutrition, aphasia, bipolar disorder, cerebrovascular disease, GERD, seizures, anemia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, gastrostomy status, insomnia, multiple pressure ulcers, suicidal ideations, mild intellectual disabilities, dysphasia following cerebral infarction, asthma, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety, pain, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins in bilateral legs, pulmonary embolism, hypertension, chronic viral hepatitis C, paraplegia, malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue, COPD, and other genetic-related intellectual disabilities. The care plans for these residents were not completed within the required timeframe, with delays ranging from several weeks to months past the mandated deadlines. Interviews with the MDS and care plan coordinator revealed that when they started in March 2024, the MDS assessments and care plans were significantly behind schedule or not completed at all. This lack of timely assessments and care plans meant that many items in the assessments had to be left blank, which affected the care plans as there were no triggers from the assessments. The Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed that they expected care plans to be created and updated in a timely manner per the RAI Manual and reflect the current status of the resident. They acknowledged that the MDS coordinator or the Social Service Director should complete the revisions and that care plans should be revised as needed.
Failure to Follow Physician's Orders for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician's orders for six residents, leading to various deficiencies in care. Resident #12, who had multiple diagnoses including malnutrition, schizophrenia, and diabetes, was supposed to receive Jevity or Isosource HN through a gastrostomy tube. However, RN C administered Glucerna instead and failed to flush the g-tube after feeding. This discrepancy was due to RN C mistaking Glucerna for Jevity. Additionally, Resident #16, diagnosed with dementia and major depressive disorder, did not receive the prescribed Trintellix medication for an extended period due to issues with prior payment authorization and lack of communication between the pharmacy and the nursing home. The resident only received the medication after being switched from Medicare Part A to Medicaid, which allowed the pharmacy to bill for it and dispense it. Resident #18, who had severe protein-calorie malnutrition and multiple other diagnoses, required suctioning as per the care plan. However, there was no order for suction, and the equipment was found undated and containing yellow and brown-green substances. The DON and Administrator acknowledged that there should have been an order for suctioning and that staff should assess the need for it regularly. Resident #26, diagnosed with malnutrition and schizophrenia, had an order for fortified foods and health shakes, but was not on the list of residents to receive them. Similarly, Resident #33, who had bipolar disorder and dysphasia, had orders for Boost and Ensure health shakes and continuous oxygen, but was observed not receiving the shakes and not wearing oxygen as prescribed. Resident #40, with diagnoses including hypertension and a stage IV pressure ulcer, had an order for a wound vac, but the device was often found not working or not connected. The resident reported that the wound vac frequently malfunctioned and that facility staff often lacked the necessary supplies to perform dressing changes. The Administrator and DON confirmed that residents should receive diets, supplements, oxygen, and other items according to physician orders and that nursing staff should have the appropriate competencies to provide specialized care.
Failure to Complete Comprehensive Discharge Summary
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a comprehensive discharge summary for one resident out of two discharged residents. The facility's policy requires a detailed discharge summary to be written by the unit nurse after a discharge care conference, which includes various aspects of the resident's status and is to be reviewed with the resident and family. However, for Resident #50, who was discharged to another facility, there was no documentation of a discharge summary. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed the absence of the discharge summary and the failure to chart the recapitulation of stay. The Administrator and DON acknowledged that they would expect a recapitulation to be completed upon discharge.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Chemotherapy Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for a resident receiving chemotherapy. The resident, diagnosed with malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue, COPD, hypertension, chronic pain, and intellectual disability, was observed with an infusion pump that had malfunctioned. The resident reported that the pump started beeping at 4:00 A.M., and some of the infusion had leaked onto their sweatshirt and hands. Despite notifying the nurse, the issue was not resolved, and the resident's infusion pump remained off and not running the following morning. The facility's staff, including the Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and Registered Nurses (RNs), demonstrated a lack of knowledge and training regarding the management of chemotherapy and infusion pumps. Interviews revealed that the staff had not received any training on how to handle chemotherapy medications, manage infusion pumps, or use spill kits. The DON admitted that the facility did not have a spill kit and that the staff did not know how to handle chemotherapy-related issues. The resident's care plan also did not address the chemotherapy treatment or provide any direction on how to care for the resident after returning from the infusion center. The facility's failure to provide appropriate care was further evidenced by the lack of communication with the infusion center. The infusion center staff reported that they had not been notified about the pump malfunction and that the facility did not answer their calls. The resident's infusion pump issue was not addressed promptly, and the staff did not follow the necessary protocols to manage the chemotherapy medication, leading to potential harm to the resident.
Failure to Implement Dietician's Recommendations for Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Registered Dietician's (RD) recommendations for weight loss were provided to the physician, affecting one resident out of 13 sampled residents. The resident, who had diagnoses including mild protein calorie malnutrition, dementia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), experienced significant weight fluctuations over several months. Despite the RD's recommendations for interventions such as double protein, health shakes, weekly weights, and Prostat supplements, these were not communicated to or implemented by the physician, leading to a lack of appropriate nutritional management for the resident. The resident's medical record showed a series of weight measurements indicating a 14.58% weight loss over three months, which was severe for the time frame. The RD made several recommendations to address the resident's nutritional needs and wound healing, but these were not converted into physician orders. The resident's care plan included monitoring and evaluating weight loss, providing supplements and snacks, and ensuring the dietician and physician were aware of lab results and weight changes. However, the facility did not follow through on these protocols. During an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the communication gap between the dietician and nursing management. The DON expected dietician recommendations to be implemented as physician orders but had not seen a dietician report in the three weeks of her tenure. The facility had not yet established weekly weight meetings, and there was a lack of mandatory meetings and education to address these issues. This failure to act on the RD's recommendations resulted in inadequate nutritional care for the resident.
Failure to Provide Personalized Dementia Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents diagnosed with dementia had personalized care plans to promote their highest level of functioning and psychosocial needs. Specifically, three residents with dementia did not have care plans addressing their condition. Resident #20, diagnosed with severe cognitive impairment and dementia with behavioral disturbance, had no care plan addressing dementia or related activities. Observations showed the resident consistently lying in bed with eyes closed and covered with a blanket. Similarly, Resident #29, also with severe cognitive impairment and dementia with behavioral disturbance, lacked a comprehensive care plan. Observations indicated the resident was unresponsive and often covered their head or face while in bed. Resident #45, diagnosed with moderate cognitive impairment and dementia with agitation, had no care plan addressing dementia or related activities, despite being observed in various locations around the facility, including the dining room and outside smoking area. Interviews with facility staff, including the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the MDS Coordinator, revealed that the facility did not have a dementia policy and that MDS assessments were significantly behind schedule. The MDS Coordinator admitted to coding many items as not assessed due to missing information and relied on assistance from nursing staff and the Social Services Designee to complete assessments. The Administrator and Director of Nursing acknowledged that residents with dementia should have personalized care plans to ensure their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Failure to Attempt Gradual Dose Reduction for Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for two residents, which had the potential to keep any resident on a psychoactive medication from receiving the lowest possible dosage. Resident #29 had diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance and altered mental status and was prescribed paroxetine and quetiapine. Despite a behavior note indicating spitting behavior and a progress note mentioning a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) with a GDR request, there was no documentation of GDR attempts or contraindications for medication adjustments. Observations showed Resident #29 often unresponsive and lying in bed with a shirt covering their face. Resident #43 had multiple diagnoses, including schizophrenia, depression, bipolar disorder, and anxiety, and was prescribed Latuda, lorazepam, and sertraline. There was no documentation of GDR attempts or contraindications for medication adjustments. Observations showed Resident #43 lying in bed with a mask over their face, pacing up and down the hall, and wearing the same suit for consecutive days. Interviews with the pharmacist and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that monthly medication reviews are conducted, and GDRs should be attempted or documented as contraindicated, but this was not done for the two residents in question.
Medication Administration Errors in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of five percent or less, resulting in a 14.29% error rate. This deficiency affected two residents, one of whom had a gastrostomy tube (g-tube) and required specific medication administration protocols. The facility's policy on medication administration and feeding tubes was not followed, leading to multiple medication errors. For Resident #12, a gabapentin capsule was improperly opened and mixed with water, which then leaked from the g-tube port onto the bed sheet during administration. For Resident #36, several medications, including desvenlafaxine ER, hydroxyurea, and Reglan, were crushed and administered through the g-tube, causing frequent clogging and improper medication delivery. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of knowledge and training regarding which medications could be crushed and administered through g-tubes. RN B admitted to crushing medications without verifying if they could be safely administered in that form. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that staff were expected to follow physician orders and medication guidelines but did not provide adequate resources or training to ensure compliance. The pharmacist confirmed that certain medications, such as extended-release forms and hydroxyurea, should not be crushed and required special handling. The facility's failure to adhere to its own policies and ensure proper medication administration practices led to a significant medication error rate. The lack of training and resources for nursing staff contributed to the improper handling of medications, particularly for residents with g-tubes. This deficiency highlights the need for improved staff education and adherence to established protocols to ensure the safe and effective administration of medications to residents.
Failure to Provide Appealing Alternative Meal Options
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appealing alternative options of similar nutritive value to residents who chose not to eat the food that was initially served. Observations showed that the menu for dinner and lunch on specific dates did not include alternative options. For instance, a resident who did not like the meal being served was given a bowl of cereal with milk because no other alternatives were available. The facility's four-week rotating menu also showed only the main meal served with no alternative options. During interviews, several residents expressed that there wasn't a specific alternative food menu available for meals, and they could only get a sandwich or cereal if they did not like the meal served. The Resident Council Meeting minutes indicated that residents had requested more food options. The Dietary Manager confirmed that there were no specific alternative menus available, and the Administrator stated that she expected dietary services to have an alternative food option of equal nutritional value available for residents who did not like the main meal served.
Improper Disposal of Garbage and Refuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that dumpsters were closed at all times and maintained to keep pests out and to keep the garbage contained. Observations showed that on multiple occasions, the dumpster lids were left open with visible garbage, including cardboard boxes and other miscellaneous items. Interviews with the Dietary Manager and a housekeeper revealed that staff were instructed to close the lids, but nursing staff often left them open. Additionally, the housekeeper mentioned that the dumpsters were not emptied frequently enough, leading to overfilled dumpsters that could not be closed properly. The Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed that they expected the dumpster lids to be closed after trash disposal.
Failure to Document COVID-19 Vaccination Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the COVID-19 vaccination was offered, administered, or refused by three residents out of five sampled residents. Specifically, the medical records for Residents #1, #26, and #102 showed no documentation of education regarding the COVID-19 vaccination, nor any record of the vaccine being provided or refused. Resident #1 had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, bradycardia, and high blood pressure. Resident #26 had diagnoses of anxiety, schizophrenia, and heart failure. Resident #102 had diagnoses of kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and a history of COVID-19. During interviews, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there was no documentation of vaccination consents or refusals for COVID-19. The Administrator and DON stated that they would expect vaccinations for COVID-19 to be given per CDC guidelines and declinations signed if refused. The facility also did not provide a COVID-19 vaccination policy, further contributing to the deficiency.
Unsafe Storage on Overbed Light Fixtures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment for residents by allowing items to be stored on top of overbed light fixtures in three rooms. This practice created a hazard of items potentially falling on residents and did not utilize the light fixtures as intended. Specific observations included a bottle containing artificial flowers, a bottle of shampoo, a book, six cards, a decorative gift bag, a decorative plaque, and a foam cup placed on the light fixtures above the beds. During an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator acknowledged that items should not be placed on the light fixtures due to the potential hazard. The facility census was 49, and no policy for overbed lighting safety was provided.
Failure to Implement Effective Staff Training Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an effective training program for all new and existing staff members. The facility assessment had not been reviewed since 2022, when the facility had only two residents. The assessment did not address the training needs or frequency of training for staff, nor did it specify which individuals or departments were responsible for conducting and tracking the training. The facility's policy on abuse required that all newly hired employees read the policy during orientation and attend yearly in-service training on abuse, but there was no evidence that this was being tracked or implemented effectively. Interviews with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed a lack of awareness regarding an education calendar or schedule for the year, a list of required training, or a list of training identified in the facility assessment. The Administrator was unsure if there was a calendar or what training was required or had been completed, while the DON, who had only been at the facility for two weeks, was unaware of who was responsible for tracking education and in-service hours. Both the Administrator and DON acknowledged that they would expect all facility staff to receive the required education to ensure adequate care for the residents, but they were still compiling a list of necessary in-services and training.
Failure to Provide Abuse and Neglect Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide abuse and neglect training for five Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and one Certified Medication Technician (CMT) out of eight sampled staff hired in the last year. The facility's policy mandates that all newly hired employees receive abuse training during orientation and attend yearly in-service training on abuse. However, a review of employee files revealed that none of the six staff members had documentation of receiving this required training. Interviews with the staff confirmed that they did not remember receiving any abuse or neglect training since their employment began. During an interview, the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that they would expect all CNAs to have abuse and neglect training upon hire. The DON mentioned that they were in the process of compiling a list of in-services and training that needed to be completed, as it had not been done. This lack of training is a significant deficiency, as it directly contravenes the facility's policy and potentially compromises the safety and well-being of the residents.
Deficiency in CNA Training and Annual Competencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct at least twelve hours of nurse aide in-service education per year and did not provide the required annual competencies in abuse prevention and dementia care for two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) sampled. CNA K, hired on 03/17/23, attended only 30 minutes of in-services, lacking an additional 11 hours and 30 minutes, and did not attend any annual competency in-services on abuse prevention or dementia care. Similarly, CNA R, hired on 02/28/23, showed no documented time for in-services and did not attend any annual competency in-services on abuse prevention or dementia care. During interviews, CNA K confirmed the lack of annual training on abuse/neglect, Alzheimer's, dementia, or behavioral health, stating that employees only sign a paper upon hire regarding abuse without any orientation or training. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the deficiency, stating that they would expect all CNAs to have 12 hours of continuing training each year, including abuse/neglect and dementia care training. They mentioned that they were compiling a list of in-services and training that need to be done, as it had not been completed.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 113 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Festus
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crystal Oaks | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 4 | 0 |
| Fountainbleau Nursing Center | 1.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 12 | 0 |
| Festus Manor | 2.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Scenic Wellness And Rehabilitation Center | 5.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
| Baisch Nursing Center | 8.3 mi | ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Superior Manor Of Festus, Llc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.