Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of July 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Continuing Care At Brooksby Village during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
PRN Psychotropic Medications Lacked Required Reassessment: Two residents received PRN benzodiazepine orders without the required provider reevaluation after the initial 14-day period. One resident had intact cognition and was ordered Ativan PRN, while another resident with dementia and anxiety had a PRN Lorazepam order without a stop date. Staff, including an RN, the UM, and the DON, stated PRN psychotropic meds require a stop date and provider review.
A resident with Parkinson's disease, dementia, and depression was observed without ordered foam boots in bed and without the ordered hand roll in one contracted hand. The resident's orthotic carrot remained on the nightstand during AM care, and later the resident was again seen in bed without foam boots while the boots were left on a wheelchair in the bathroom. The DON and a UM stated that staff should follow the physician orders and care plan.
A facility failed to meet professional standards for two residents. One resident was admitted with hyperlipidemia and hospital paperwork and the H&P both indicated Rosuvastatin/Crestor 20 mg, but the med was not entered on admission and staff confirmed there was no order to stop it until the attending later wrote a new order. Another resident with dementia and total ADL dependence had an order for an Optifoam dressing change to a left arm skin tear every 3 days, but surveyors observed the same dated dressing still in place on two separate checks, and the UM and DON confirmed nurses are to follow MD orders.
A resident with an indwelling Foley catheter and diagnoses including urinary retention and CKD had a catheter order that addressed changing the bag and catheter monthly, but the record did not show the catheter size. Staff interviews confirmed the chart lacked catheter-size details, and the care plan also did not include those specifics. The record also lacked a nursing note documenting the catheter change, and the hospice note did not indicate the resident had a Foley catheter.
Inaccurate documentation occurred when staff recorded ordered treatments and devices as completed when they were not. One resident with severe cognitive impairment had a left arm dressing still in place while the TAR showed the treatment as done, and another resident with Parkinson's disease and dementia was observed without ordered foam boots and with a missing hand roll even though the TAR documented the care as provided. The DON and UM stated staff should follow physician orders and the care plan and should not chart care as completed when it was not.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's Disease was found with a bed sheet tightly wrapped around their body, restricting access to their incontinent brief. A CNA applied the sheet without medical order or inclusion in the care plan, intending to prevent the resident from accessing feces after episodes of diarrhea. The resident was unable to remove the restraint independently, and staff confirmed this use of a physical restraint was not authorized.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment reported being physically abused by a CNA, resulting in a bruise. The nurse reported the incident to the Nurse Supervisor, but the Supervisor failed to immediately report it as an abuse allegation to the DON, as required by the facility's policy.
A resident with a complex medical history experienced worsening of a right lower extremity wound due to the facility's failure to reschedule a wound clinic appointment, improper application of Dakin's solution without a protective barrier, and lack of weekly wound assessments. Additionally, coban was applied without a physician's order, resulting in a new blister. These actions did not adhere to professional standards of practice.
The facility did not conduct mandatory QAPI training for its staff. A review of the Facility Assessment and employee education records showed no documentation of QAPI training for 15 direct care employees, including CNAs and licensed nurses. The Administrator confirmed the absence of such training.
The facility failed to ensure a dignified experience for residents by allowing staff to speak a foreign language in the presence of primarily English-speaking residents on the Terrace unit. Observations and interviews confirmed that staff conversed in a foreign language in common and dining areas, despite the Director of Nursing's acknowledgment that resident care areas are English-speaking only.
The facility failed to provide adequate care for residents with pressure ulcers, as observed in four cases. A resident with a stage 4 ulcer had an air mattress set incorrectly, while another with a stage 2 ulcer lacked a physician's order for an air mattress and was not assessed weekly. A third resident's stage 2 ulcer was not documented in weekly assessments, and a fourth resident's deep tissue injury was not monitored as required. The DON and staff acknowledged these deficiencies.
The facility failed to ensure nursing staff were trained and demonstrated competencies in wound care, as required by the Facility Assessment. The assessment did not specify necessary competencies, and multiple deficiencies were identified during the survey, including failures in wound assessment, treatment, and communication with providers. A review showed 7 out of 10 nurses lacked completed wound care competencies since hire, and the DON was unaware of these lapses.
The facility did not conduct a thorough assessment to identify necessary nursing competencies for resident care. The assessment lacked specific competencies, and interviews revealed that both the DON and Administrator were unaware of the required competencies, with the DON unable to provide a list during the survey.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and a care plan requiring meal supervision was repeatedly observed eating without staff assistance, leading to spills and potential safety risks. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in understanding the resident's needs, contributing to the deficiency.
Two residents in a facility experienced deficiencies in fall prevention measures. A resident with Alzheimer's fell and fractured a wrist due to the absence of a urinal, contrary to their care plan. Another resident with a history of falls lacked non-skid strips and a fall mat, as required by their care plan. Staff interviews confirmed these oversights, highlighting a failure to adhere to the facility's fall management policy.
A resident with obstructive sleep apnea used a CPAP machine without a physician's order, as required by professional standards. The facility's policy did not specify the need for such an order, leading to the oversight. Staff acknowledged the error, noting the CPAP was used at night and sometimes during naps, but assistance was inconsistent.
The facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions were followed when a nurse and a nurse practitioner did not wear a precaution gown during wound care for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions. Despite signage indicating the need for gowns and gloves, they only wore gloves while treating a resident with a chronic wound and pressure ulcer. The DON confirmed that gowns should have been worn as per the facility's policy.
PRN Psychotropic Medications Lacked Required Reassessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure two residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications by not ensuring reassessment of PRN psychotropic medication after 14 days. Facility policy titled Psychoactive Medications, revised 4/25, stated that residents on PRN psychoactive medications would be evaluated by a physician before extending use past 14 days. Resident #48, admitted in June 2024 with diagnoses including hypertensive chronic kidney disease, urinary retention, adult failure to thrive, and chronic pain, had a most recent MDS dated 12/23/25 showing a BIMS score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Records showed an order for Ativan 0.5 mg PRN every four hours starting 9/25/25 and discontinued 12/22/25, followed by a new physician order on 12/22/25 for Ativan 0.5 mg PRN every four hours for 30 days. Resident #5, admitted in June 2025 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, severe with anxiety, and need for assistance with personal care, had an MDS dated 12/29/25 showing a BIMS score of 10 out of 15 and use of antianxiety medications. The active physician orders included Lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet, one tablet PRN every four hours, dated 12/23/25, and the order did not include a stop date. The resident’s care plan directed staff to monitor for sleepiness, drooling, increased confusion, restlessness, change in posture, and involuntary movements because of psychotropic drug use. During interviews, Nurse #1, the Unit Manager, and the DON stated that PRN psychotropic medications should have a 14-day stop date and be reevaluated by the provider, and that Resident #5’s PRN Lorazepam order did not have a stop date.
Failure to Follow Ordered Positioning and Protective Devices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement the plan of care for one resident in the sample, Resident #9, by not placing foam booties and hand rolls as ordered. Resident #9 was admitted in August 2025 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, and depression. Physician orders dated January 2026 directed that foam boots be applied to both feet when in bed and that, after morning care, a carrot be placed to the right hand as tolerated, with hand rolls placed in both hands during evening care. The care plan for skin integrity also indicated heel protectors for both feet when in bed and hand rolls in both hands as ordered. On 1/20/26 at 8:25 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #9 in bed without foam boots, with both heels directly on the mattress. The resident had a contracted left hand without a hand roll in place, and the hand roll was not observed in the bed or elsewhere in the room. The resident had a contracted right hand with a hand roll in place, and an orthotic carrot was on the nightstand, indicating morning care had not yet been provided. Later that day at 1:50 P.M., the resident was again observed in bed without foam boots and with heels directly on the mattress, while the foam boots were observed on a wheelchair in the bathroom. During interviews, the DON stated that staff should follow physician orders and the care plan, and Unit Manager #1 stated that both the care plan and physician orders should be followed.
Medication Reconciliation and Dressing Care Not Completed as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for Resident #68 by not accurately reconciling medication orders on admission. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including hyperlipidemia, weakness, and cognitive communication deficits. Admission paperwork from the referring hospital indicated Rosuvastatin 20 mg by mouth at bedtime, with documentation that the lipid panel showed a very high LDL and that a neurology consult recommended a high intensity statin. The physician’s admission history and physical also documented continuation of Crestor 20 mg once daily, but the active and discontinued physician orders did not show Rosuvastatin added to the medication regimen, and the record did not show that any hospital-recommended medications had been discontinued or changed at admission. Staff interviews confirmed there was no order to discontinue the medication, and the attending physician stated he had not instructed that any medications be stopped or not initiated on admission and that a new order was written later to start Rosuvastatin as recommended by the hospital. The facility also failed to change a dressing as ordered for Resident #7. The resident had diagnoses including dementia, depression, and malnutrition and was severely cognitively impaired and totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Physician orders directed that an Optifoam dressing to the left upper extremity skin tear be changed every three days after cleansing with normal saline, patting dry, applying Steri-Strips, and covering with Optifoam until healed. Surveyors observed the resident in bed on two separate occasions with a dressing on the left arm dated 1/16/26, and the dressing remained in place without being changed as ordered. The Unit Manager stated the dressing should have been changed as ordered, and the DON stated that nurses are to follow physician orders.
Foley Catheter Order Lacked Size Details
Penalty
Summary
Professional standards of practice for Foley catheter care were not ensured for one resident with an indwelling catheter. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including hypertensive chronic kidney disease, retention of urine, adult failure to thrive, and chronic pain, and the most recent MDS indicated intact cognition with a BIMS score of 14 out of 15 and the presence of an indwelling catheter. The resident was observed in bed with a Foley catheter, and the physician order in the record addressed changing the Foley bag every month and changing the Foley catheter every month. Review of the record showed no nursing note documenting a catheter change on the date the order was written, and the most recent hospice note did not indicate that the resident had a Foley catheter. During interview, a nurse stated the record did not show what size Foley catheter should be used and explained that knowing the size is important so all nurses change the catheter the same way. The unit manager and ADON also stated the catheter size should be included in the order and care plan, while the DON stated the catheter size does not need to be included in the order.
Inaccurate Documentation of Ordered Treatments and Positioning Devices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately document care in the medical record for two residents out of a sample of 19. For one resident with diagnoses including dementia, depression, and malnutrition, the record showed a treatment was completed on the TAR even though the dressing on the left arm remained dated 1/16/26 when observed on 1/20/26 and again on 1/21/26. The resident had severe cognitive impairment and was totally dependent on staff for all ADLs. The Unit Manager stated the dressing should have been changed as ordered and that staff should not document a treatment as completed when it was not; the DON also stated nurses should not document that a treatment was completed when it was not. For another resident with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, and depression, physician orders and the care plan directed use of foam boots to both feet when in bed and hand rolls/carrot positioning for the hands. Surveyors observed the resident in bed without foam boots, with heels directly on the mattress, and observed a hand roll missing from one hand while the other hand had a hand roll and a carrot was on the nightstand, indicating the ordered A.M. care had not yet been provided. The TAR nevertheless documented that foam boots were in place on two shifts and that hand rolls and the carrot were in place as ordered when one hand roll was not. The DON and Unit Manager stated staff should follow physician orders and the care plan and should not document a treatment as completed when it was not.
Unauthorized Use of Physical Restraint on Cognitively Impaired Resident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a certified nurse aide (CNA) wrapped a bed sheet around a resident with severe cognitive impairment, from under the chest to below the buttocks, to prevent the resident from accessing the area of their incontinent brief. The resident, diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease and requiring substantial to maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, was found by another CNA in the morning with the sheet tightly wrapped around their body. The resident was unable to remove the sheet independently due to cognitive and physical limitations, and the sheet restricted the resident's ability to touch their mid-torso and brief area. The facility's abuse prevention policy defines misuse of restraints as any material attached or adjacent to a resident's body that cannot be easily removed and restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body, especially when not ordered by a medical provider or included in the plan of care. The resident's plan of care did not include the use of restraints, and there was no medical order for such an intervention. The CNA who applied the restraint did not notify the nurse or any other staff about the resident's behavior or the use of the bed sheet as a restraint. Interviews with staff confirmed that the CNA wrapped the sheet to prevent the resident from accessing feces in the brief, following episodes of diarrhea and fecal smearing. The incident was discovered during morning care, and staff agreed that the resident would not have been able to remove the sheet independently. The use of the bed sheet in this manner was not authorized and constituted a physical restraint, contrary to facility policy and regulatory requirements.
Failure to Immediately Report Abuse Allegation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that staff implemented and followed their abuse policy when a resident reported an allegation of physical abuse. On December 12, 2024, a nurse noticed a bruise on a resident's right arm during early morning care. The resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired and required assistance from two staff members, reported that a CNA had been rough and pushed them the previous evening. The nurse immediately reported the incident to the Nurse Supervisor, as per the facility's policy. However, the Nurse Supervisor did not immediately report the abuse allegation to the Director of Nursing (DON) as required by the facility's abuse policy. Instead, the Nurse Supervisor reported the incident as a concern about care provided, not as an abuse allegation, to the DON at 8:30 A.M. The DON later determined that the incident was indeed an allegation of abuse after reviewing the nursing documentation at 2:30 P.M. This delay in reporting the abuse allegation was a failure to adhere to the facility's policy, which mandates immediate reporting of such incidents.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Wound Care and Follow Physician Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care for a resident with a deteriorating right lower extremity wound. The resident, who was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance, had a history of diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and a traumatic wound. Despite multiple orders from a Nurse Practitioner to reschedule a wound clinic appointment due to the worsening condition of the wound, the facility did not ensure the appointment was made. The unit secretary responsible for scheduling was on vacation, and no one covered her duties, leading to confusion and a lack of follow-up on the resident's care needs. Additionally, the facility did not adhere to the physician's order regarding the application of z-guard before soaking the wound in Dakin's solution. This oversight resulted in the resident experiencing pain and further deterioration of the wound. Nurses frequently applied the z-guard after the Dakin's solution, contrary to the specified order, and were unaware of the potential damage Dakin's solution could cause to healthy tissue. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the solution is caustic and painful, emphasizing the importance of following the physician's order to protect the surrounding skin. The facility also failed to conduct weekly assessments and measurements of the resident's wound as required by the care plan. There was a significant gap between documented wound assessments, during which the wound worsened. Furthermore, the facility applied coban without a physician's order, leading to the development of a new blister on the resident's lower extremity. The improper use of coban under an ace wrap was identified as a contributing factor to the blister, highlighting a lack of adherence to professional standards of practice.
Failure to Implement Mandatory QAPI Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement mandatory training on the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program for its staff. A review of the Facility Assessment dated November 1, 2024, did not indicate any mandatory QAPI training. Additionally, an examination of the education records for 15 direct care employees, including 5 certified nurse assistants (CNAs) and 10 licensed nurses, revealed that none had documentation of completing QAPI training during their employment. During an interview on December 23, 2024, the Administrator confirmed that the facility does not provide any QAPI training to employees.
Failure to Ensure Dignified Experience for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a dignified experience for residents on the Terrace unit by allowing staff to speak a foreign language in the presence of primarily English-speaking residents. This was observed during a resident group meeting where three residents expressed that staff spoke in a foreign language in front of them. Additionally, a surveyor observed staff members conversing in a foreign language in the common area and dining area of the Terrace unit, where residents were present and within earshot. Further observations included staff speaking a foreign language while providing feeding assistance to a resident, with other residents at the table and nearby. A resident responded by stating they did not understand the language being spoken. Interviews with a nurse and the Director of Nursing confirmed that staff had been speaking in a foreign language in resident care areas, which are designated as English-speaking only. The Director of Nursing acknowledged witnessing this behavior in the past.
Failure to Provide Adequate Pressure Ulcer Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services for residents with pressure ulcers, as observed in four cases. Resident #30, who had a stage 4 pressure ulcer, was found with an air mattress set incorrectly at 260 lbs instead of the required 140 lbs, which was not adjusted despite multiple observations. This incorrect setting was acknowledged by the nursing staff and the Director of Nursing (DON), who confirmed that the air mattress should be set to the resident's weight and checked every shift. Resident #52, admitted with a stage 2 pressure ulcer, did not have a physician's order for an air mattress, and the ulcer was not assessed or measured weekly as required. The treatment administration record (TAR) lacked documentation of the ulcer's measurements, and the resident was not included in the facility's risk meeting notes or pressure ulcer audit. The DON and nursing staff acknowledged the lack of documentation and the absence of a physician's order for the air mattress. Resident #1, with a stage 2 pressure injury, did not have weekly skin assessments documented after the injury was identified. The nursing staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) admitted that wound rounds had not been conducted due to staffing changes, and the resident's condition was not discussed in risk meetings. Similarly, Resident #12, with a deep tissue injury, did not have weekly wound assessments documented, and the wound was not monitored as required. The DON confirmed that wounds should be assessed weekly and documented, but this was not done for Resident #12.
Deficiency in Nursing Staff Competency for Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that nursing staff were adequately trained and demonstrated the necessary competencies for wound care, as outlined in the Facility Assessment. The assessment, dated 11/21/24, indicated that the facility offered services related to skin integrity, including pressure injury prevention and wound care. However, it did not specify the required nurse competencies for these services. The facility's policy on 'Health Services Education and Training' required supervisors to validate employee knowledge and ability through competency reviews, but this was not effectively implemented. During the recertification survey, multiple deficiencies in wound care were identified, including failures to assess and measure wounds weekly, implement enhanced barrier precautions, follow physician's orders for wound treatments, notify providers of new or changing wounds, and complete weekly skin checks. A review of staff education files revealed that 7 out of 10 licensed nurses responsible for wound care had not completed wound competencies since their hire. The Director of Nursing, who was covering the vacant staff development nurse position, was unaware of these lapses. The Administrator expected that all nurses would have completed clinical competencies, including wound care, upon hire.
Failure to Identify and Implement Necessary Nursing Competencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct a comprehensive facility-wide assessment to determine the necessary resources for competent resident care during both routine operations and emergencies. The assessment, dated 11/21/24, did not specify the nursing competencies required to provide the services and care offered by the facility. Additionally, the facility's policy on 'Health Services Education and Training' from April 2023 indicated that supervisors and managers should complete competency reviews to validate employee knowledge and ability to perform tasks. However, this was not effectively implemented. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator revealed a lack of awareness regarding the inclusion of nursing competencies in the facility assessment. The DON, who was temporarily covering the staff development nurse position, was unaware of the competencies required upon hire and could not provide a list of specific competencies during the survey. Similarly, the Administrator was unable to locate a list of required competencies, indicating a disconnect between the facility's practices and the guidance from the home office.
Failure to Supervise Resident During Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary supervision for Resident #32 during meals, despite the resident's care plan indicating a need for such supervision. Resident #32, who was admitted with conditions including atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, and moderate cognitive impairment, was observed multiple times without staff supervision while eating. The resident's care plan and occupational therapy evaluations clearly stated the requirement for supervision during meals to ensure safety and proper assistance. However, observations on several occasions showed the resident eating alone, with food and drink spilled, and no staff present to assist or supervise. Interviews with facility staff revealed inconsistencies in understanding and implementing the resident's care plan. CNA #3 acknowledged the need for supervision but mentioned only watching from the hallway, while CNA #2 incorrectly stated that the resident did not require supervision. Nurse #7 also misunderstood the resident's needs, suggesting that supervision was not currently necessary but might be in the future. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the care plan should be followed, emphasizing the importance of supervision to prevent choking and ensure the resident is seated upright while eating. This lack of adherence to the care plan and miscommunication among staff led to the deficiency in providing adequate care for Resident #32.
Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Measures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an environment free from accidents and hazards for two residents, leading to deficiencies in their care. Resident #31, who has Alzheimer's Disease and severe cognitive impairment, fell and sustained a wrist fracture while attempting to self-toilet. The resident's care plan required a urinal to be kept within reach of the bed, but observations revealed that the urinal was not present, and there was no documentation of the resident refusing the urinal. Interviews with staff confirmed the expectation that the urinal should be available as per the care plan. Resident #32, with moderate cognitive impairment and a history of repeated falls, was observed without the necessary fall prevention measures in place. The resident's care plan included the use of non-skid strips and a fall mat next to the bed, but these were not observed during multiple visits. Despite having a history of falls, the care plan and physician's orders did not reflect the necessary interventions, and staff interviews indicated uncertainty about the accuracy of the care plan documentation. The facility's policy on fall management emphasizes individualized care plans and the implementation of interventions to prevent falls. However, the lack of adherence to these plans for Residents #31 and #32 resulted in preventable accidents. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the expectation for interventions to be in place and reviewed the process for updating care plans following falls, but the deficiencies observed indicate a failure to implement these procedures effectively.
Failure to Obtain Physician's Order for CPAP Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide respiratory care services in accordance with professional standards of practice for a resident diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea. The resident was admitted to the facility with a CPAP machine, which is used to treat sleep apnea, but the facility did not obtain a physician's order for its use. Despite the resident using the CPAP machine at night and expressing a preference to use it during daytime naps, there was no documentation of a physician's order in the resident's active orders. The facility's policy on respiratory equipment did not specify the need for a physician's order for CPAP use, contributing to the oversight. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident sometimes could not use the CPAP machine due to a lack of assistance from staff, such as ensuring the machine had water in its chamber. Staff members, including nurses and the Director of Nursing, acknowledged that a physician's order should have been obtained when the CPAP machine was brought in, but this step was missed. The oversight was evident as the CPAP machine was observed on the resident's bedside table, and staff were aware of its presence, yet failed to ensure the necessary orders were in place.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that transmission-based precautions were followed to prevent the spread of infections. Specifically, the deficiency occurred when Nurse #6 and Nurse Practitioner (NP) #1 did not don a precaution gown while performing wound care for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions. The resident had a chronic traumatic wound with a large amount of drainage and an unstageable pressure ulcer. Despite the presence of a sign at the resident's doorway indicating the need for enhanced barrier precautions, both staff members wore only gloves during the wound dressing change. During a follow-up interview, Nurse #6 acknowledged that the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions and admitted that she should have worn a gown during the wound care but did not. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that enhanced barrier precautions, including the use of a precaution gown, are required for wound care and dressing changes for wounds with drainage or that are chronic. The DON stated that a precaution gown should have been worn during the wound care for any resident with a sign on the doorway indicating the requirement for enhanced barrier precautions.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,057 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Peabody
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Health At Rosewood | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 8 | 0 |
| Care One At Peabody | 1.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 10 | 0 |
| Pilgrim Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center | 1.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 5 | 0 |
| Hathorne Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 1.9 mi | ★★★★★ | 14 | 0 |
| Hunt Nursing & Rehab Center | 2.1 mi | ★★★★★ | 21 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Continuing Care At Brooksby Village.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 2026) and official state health department websites.