Bayou Chateau Nursing Ctr
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Simmesport, Louisiana.
- Location
- 16232 Hwy. 1, Simmesport, Louisiana 71369
- CMS Provider Number
- 195546
- Inspections on file
- 21
- Latest survey
- January 7, 2026
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 7
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Bayou Chateau Nursing Ctr during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple neurologic and nutritional diagnoses had a PEG feeding tube and was placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), as indicated by signage on the room door and the facility’s infection control policy requiring gown use for high-contact care involving indwelling devices. During observed medication administration, an LPN provided medications and tube feeding via the PEG tube without donning a gown. In interviews, the LPN acknowledged the resident was on EBP and confirmed a gown was not worn, and the DON and ADON stated that a gown was required for direct contact under EBP and confirmed it should have been used during this care but was not.
A treatment nurse did not follow required hand hygiene and glove change protocols during wound care for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions. The nurse failed to remove gloves and perform hand hygiene at key steps, as outlined in facility policy, during a pressure ulcer dressing change. This was confirmed by both the nurse and the DON during interviews.
The facility did not post daily nurse staffing information as required. Observations showed that the form for daily nursing hours was not updated for several days. An RN was unsure who was responsible for posting the information over the weekend, and the DON confirmed that the required updates had not been made.
A facility failed to ensure a resident's call bell was within reach, as required by their policy. Despite staff indicating the resident could use the call bell, observations showed it was on the floor, inaccessible. The resident, with conditions like Microcephaly and Muscle Wasting, required staff assistance for daily activities, emphasizing the need for accessible call systems.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and multiple medical conditions did not receive necessary nail care, despite expressing a desire for it. The resident's care plan required assistance with ADLs, including personal hygiene. An LPN confirmed the need for nail cutting, noting that the treatment nurse or nurses could perform this task for diabetic residents.
The facility did not follow the menu for residents on a pureed diet, omitting seasoned greens, cornbread, and fruit crisp from the lunch meal. This was confirmed by the dietary manager, resulting in a failure to meet the nutritional needs of the residents.
The facility failed to properly store and label food items, with issues such as exposed cheese, improperly defrosting meat, and undated frozen fish. Additionally, dented cans and unsealed noodles were found in dry storage. Cooked food was not maintained at the required temperature, with pureed sausage served below 135°F. The Dietary Manager acknowledged these deficiencies.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of falls did not have the prescribed bright tape applied to her bathroom door frame as part of her care plan. The DON acknowledged the oversight, noting the tape had been ordered but not yet received, and confirmed no alternative fall prevention measures were in place.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident With PEG Tube
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a failure to follow the facility’s own infection prevention and control policy regarding Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with an indwelling medical device. The facility’s policy, dated 04/15/2025, required implementation of EBP, including use of gowns for high-contact resident care activities such as device use with feeding tubes, for residents with indwelling medical devices even if they were not known to be infected or colonized with multidrug-resistant organisms. The policy also stated that all staff were to receive training on EBP upon hire and at least annually and were expected to comply with all designated precautions. The resident involved was admitted on 09/04/2025 and had diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, gastrostomy, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, personal history of sudden cardiac arrest, and aphasia following other cerebrovascular disease. The quarterly MDS showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent for multiple ADLs, including hygiene and bathing. The resident had a PEG feeding tube and a care plan addressing PEG tube feedings. An EBP sign was posted on the resident’s room door. During observation of medication administration, an LPN administered medications and tube feeding through the PEG tube without donning a gown. In a subsequent interview, the LPN acknowledged the resident was on EBP due to the PEG tube and confirmed she did not wear a gown, and the DON and ADON stated that a gown should be worn for direct contact with residents on EBP and confirmed a gown should have been worn during this care but was not.
Failure to Perform Hand Hygiene During Pressure Ulcer Care
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a treatment nurse failed to follow proper hand hygiene protocols during the care of a pressure ulcer for a resident. The facility's policy required hand hygiene and glove changes at specific steps during wound care, including after removing the old dressing, after cleaning the wound, and before applying a new dressing. However, during an observed dressing change for a resident with multiple complex medical conditions, the nurse did not remove gloves or perform hand hygiene at any of these required points. The resident involved had severe cognitive impairment and was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. The resident's medical history included adult failure to thrive, long-term antibiotic use, anxiety disorder, functional quadriplegia, encephalopathy, MRSA infection, multiple contractures, and cognitive communication deficits. The nurse confirmed during an interview that she did not perform hand hygiene or change gloves as required during the wound care procedure. The DON also confirmed that the nurse had previously completed a skills checkoff on hand hygiene but failed to follow protocol during this incident.
Failure to Post Daily Nurse Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post daily nurse staffing information, which is a requirement. Observations on August 5, 2024, at 6:03 a.m. revealed that the form for daily nursing hours, dated from August 1, 2024, to August 12, 2024, was posted on a bulletin board near the nurse's station. However, the daily staffing hours for August 2, 2024, through August 5, 2024, were not posted. An interview with an RN indicated uncertainty about who was responsible for posting the daily nursing hours over the weekend, although it was acknowledged that they should be posted daily. Further observation on the same day at 7:45 a.m. confirmed that the form had not been updated to include the required information. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) at 12:35 p.m. revealed that she was responsible for updating and posting the facility's daily nursing hours. The DON confirmed that the daily nursing hours for the specified dates had not been updated or posted.
Call Bell Accessibility Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received services with reasonable accommodation of needs, specifically regarding the placement of a call bell. The facility's policy on call light accessibility requires that the call system be accessible to residents while in their bed or other sleeping accommodations. However, observations on multiple occasions revealed that the call light for a resident with diagnoses including Microcephaly, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, was on the floor next to the left-hand side of the bed, out of reach. Interviews with staff indicated that the resident was able to use the call bell if needed, yet the call bell was not accessible during the observations. The resident's medical record indicated a need for staff assistance with various activities of daily living, highlighting the importance of having the call bell within reach.
Failure to Provide Adequate Nail Care for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that activities of daily living (ADLs) were adequately performed for a resident, specifically in providing nail care. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease, Heart Failure, and Major Depressive Disorder, had a BIMS score indicating moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision or assistance with personal hygiene. The resident's care plan noted the need for assistance with all ADLs due to general weakness and impaired cognition, with interventions such as verbal cues and task breakdowns. Observations revealed that the resident had long fingernails and expressed a desire to have them cut, indicating that the resident did not refuse nail care. An LPN confirmed the need for nail cutting and stated that the treatment nurse or nurses could perform this task for diabetic residents.
Failure to Follow Pureed Diet Menu
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to meet the nutritional needs of residents on a pureed diet by not following the established menu. During the lunch meal on August 5, 2024, for residents on a pureed diet, the menu included sliced ham, red beans and rice, seasoned greens, cornbread, and fruit crisp. However, observations revealed that seasoned greens, cornbread, and fruit crisp were not served to residents #15, #19, and #22. The dietary assistant prepared trays without these items, and the trays were subsequently served to the residents by CNAs. An interview with the dietary manager confirmed that the menu called for these items, which were missing from the serving line. This oversight resulted in the facility not adhering to the menu designed to ensure nutritional adequacy for the residents on a pureed diet.
Food Storage and Temperature Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage, preparation, and labeling of food items in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. During an observation of the kitchen, a block of cheese was found partially wrapped and exposed to air, resulting in discoloration. A tube of ground meat was improperly defrosting on a wire rack, dripping blood-tinged liquid onto the shelf and floor. Additionally, a bag of frozen fish lacked an expiration or use-by date. In the dry storage area, dented cans of syrup and pineapple sauce were found on the shelf, and an open bag of fettuccini noodles was not stored in a sealed bag. The Dietary Manager acknowledged these issues during the observation. Furthermore, the facility did not maintain cooked food at the required temperature. During breakfast service, pureed sausage was observed on a steam table in a non-heated area, with a temperature reading of 125 degrees Fahrenheit, below the required 135 degrees. The Dietary Manager confirmed that the sausage was not at the appropriate holding temperature, indicating a failure to adhere to food safety standards.
Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Measures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, as indicated by a BIMS score of 7. The resident, who had diagnoses including unspecified dementia, aphasia, dizziness, and anxiety disorders, experienced a fall in her room while attempting to ambulate to the bathroom. The care plan, reviewed on 08/02/2024, included an intervention to add bright tape to the bathroom door frame to prevent further falls. However, an observation on 06/06/2024 revealed that the bright tape had not been applied to the door frame. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the absence of the tape, stating it had been ordered but not yet arrived, and confirmed that no other fall prevention measures had been implemented for the resident.
Latest citations in Louisiana
A resident with Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor, dementia, and legal blindness, who was care planned as being at risk for burns from hot liquids and to receive hot beverages in lidded cups at temperatures not exceeding 130°F, sustained 2nd and 3rd degree burns to the left thigh after spilling coffee during a group activity. The facility’s policy required hot beverages to be cooled to 120–130°F and mandated temperature monitoring, but the coffee served at the time of the incident was reported by dietary staff to be 140°F, and the coffee temperature log did not include documentation for the 10:00 a.m. service when the spill occurred. This failure to adhere to the hot beverage policy and to consistently monitor and document beverage temperatures resulted in actual harm to the resident.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, multiple chronic conditions, and hospice services required extensive assistance for transfers. During a transfer from wheelchair to bed performed by a CNA, the resident’s left lower leg rubbed against an enabler bar that had a missing end cap, creating a sharp edge. An LPN observed a large laceration on the leg and identified the defective enabler bar as the source of injury. The resident was sent to the ED, where a deep, 25.5 cm stellate laceration required extensive cleaning, internal and external sutures, a tetanus shot, and subsequent daily wound care and antibiotics due to delayed healing. The incident occurred despite facility policies and the Maintenance Supervisor’s responsibilities requiring regular inspection of bed rails and enabler bars for hazards.
The facility did not maintain the required 8 consecutive hours of daily RN coverage on multiple days, as time card records showed that the only scheduled RN worked less than 8 hours on several occasions. The administrator confirmed that this RN was the sole RN scheduled during the period reviewed and acknowledged that full daily RN coverage was not provided on the identified days.
The facility failed to maintain adequate supplies of clean bath towels and bed linens despite its own assessment identifying the need to keep sufficient PAR levels for these items. A resident with a history of traumatic brain injury and another with type 2 DM and asthma, both cognitively intact, reported that towels and linens were often unavailable, with one resident’s family providing personal linens due to frequent shortages. The grievance log documented a complaint about missing personal towels and sheets, and staff, including laundry personnel, a CNA, and the ADON, confirmed that clean towels and bed linens were frequently unavailable during multiple weeks, affecting all residents in the facility.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, dementia, and multiple comorbidities, assessed as high risk for elopement due to prior exit-seeking and wandering, was found alone outside near the front entrance in a flower bed by an oncoming LPN. The LPN assisted the resident and notified staff inside, and the responsible party later reported the same event. Despite a written wandering and elopement policy requiring notification of regulatory agencies after such incidents, the Administrator acknowledged that this elopement was not reported to the State Survey Agency as required by state law.
A resident with multiple conditions, including type 2 DM, dementia with behavioral symptoms, gait abnormalities, and an anxiety disorder, was documented in progress notes as having eloped and been found outside in a flower bed, and later was found to have a diabetic ulcer on the right heel. Review of the comprehensive care plan showed it was not revised to address either the elopement or the new diabetic ulcer, and the MDS coordinator acknowledged that the care plan should have been updated to reflect these changes in condition.
A resident with type 2 DM, dementia, mobility impairments, and other comorbidities was admitted with a documented deep tissue injury on the right heel, but no corresponding MD wound care orders or treatments were recorded for approximately one month despite a care plan directive to assess for skin breakdown and treat as ordered. A NP note referenced treatment with gentian violet and foam, yet this was not supported by physician orders or the TAR. Later, a wound care nurse identified a diabetic ulcer on the same heel and initiated gentian violet and foam dressings after an order was finally obtained, with treatments documented on only a few dates. The resident was later seen in the ED for cellulitis related to the diabetic heel ulcer and discharged with antibiotics, and both the wound care nurse and NP confirmed gaps in assessment, ordering, and follow-up of the heel wound.
Staff failed to follow infection control protocols during incontinence care for two residents, including not performing required hand hygiene between glove changes and after contact with stool, and placing soiled items on clean linens. CNAs provided perineal care, handled residents’ clean clothing, body surfaces, wheelchairs, and room surfaces, and managed soiled briefs and pads without appropriate glove changes or hand sanitizing, contrary to facility policy. Both CNAs later acknowledged they should have performed hand hygiene and changed gloves correctly, and the DON confirmed that staff are expected to follow these infection prevention practices.
Two residents were not treated in a manner that promoted dignity and quality of life. One resident with left-sided weakness and a flaccid arm following a stroke requested a bedpan, but a CNA told her she was wearing a diaper and could use it instead, despite therapy having recommended bedpan use and the resident not wanting to use a diaper. Another resident with vascular dementia, a history of C. diff enterocolitis, heart failure, and depression, and a moderately impaired BIMS score continued to receive meals on disposable dishware in the dining room even though contact isolation precautions had been discontinued, and nursing leadership confirmed this should not have occurred.
A resident with paraplegia, severe cognitive impairment (BIMS 6), and dependence for mobility and hygiene was repeatedly observed in bed and in a Geri chair without access to a call light, despite facility policy requiring call lights to be within easy reach when residents are in bed or confined to a chair. On multiple occasions throughout the day, the call light was found on the floor or hanging on the side of the bed, out of the resident’s reach. The resident reported being unable to reach the call light, and both a CNA and the DON acknowledged that the call light was not within reach and should have been accessible.
Resident Burn from Overheated Coffee and Failure to Follow Hot Beverage Policy
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards and that residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents, specifically related to serving hot beverages. The facility had a written policy titled “Serving Hot Beverages and Soup,” revised in 07/2007, which required the Food Service Department to monitor the temperature of all hot liquids to prevent burns if they contacted skin. The policy specified that coffee should be chilled to 120–130°F before being served and that the Food Service Department was responsible for ensuring all hot beverages, including those for activities, left the kitchen at the proper temperature. However, the coffee temperature log for March only included entries for 6:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., with no slot or documentation for 10:00 a.m. coffee temperatures, despite coffee being served at that time. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinson’s disease, unspecified dementia, essential tremor, and legal blindness. A quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/31/2025 showed a BIMS score of 13, indicating the resident was cognitively intact, and Section GG indicated no functional limitation in upper extremity range of motion. The resident’s care plan included a focus that the resident was at risk for burns from hot liquids, with interventions such as encouraging consumption of hot liquids while sitting at a table, requiring use of a cup with a lid for all hot beverages, and specifying that the temperature of hot liquids should not exceed 130°F. Another care plan focus addressed impaired visual function related to legal blindness, with interventions to provide activities adjusted to the resident’s visual disability. During a 10:00 a.m. group activity, Resident #1 spilled hot coffee on her lap. The dietary manager later confirmed that coffee was served at 6:30 a.m., 10:00 a.m., and 2:00 p.m., and that the dietary aide who prepared the coffee for the incident reported the coffee temperature as 140°F, which exceeded the facility’s policy limit of 130°F. Resident #1 reported that she spilled coffee on herself while sitting at a table in the activity room and that the coffee was hot and burned when it was spilled. Subsequent nursing and NP assessments documented two in-house–acquired wounds on the resident’s left upper thigh: one described as a blister and one as a burn, later characterized by the NP as a full-thickness (3rd degree) burn and a partial-thickness (2nd degree) burn. These findings, combined with the lack of documented 10:00 a.m. temperature monitoring and the reported serving temperature of 140°F, demonstrate that the facility did not follow its hot beverage policy and failed to protect the resident from an avoidable burn hazard.
Failure to Maintain Safe Enabler Bar Results in Severe Leg Laceration
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that a resident’s enabler bar was free from accident hazards, resulting in an actual injury. The facility’s own Bed and Side Rails policy required a designee to inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, including grab bars and assist bars, as part of a regular maintenance program. The Maintenance Supervisor job description also required daily tours of the property to identify and correct hazardous conditions and liability hazards. Despite these requirements, the enabler bar on one resident’s bed had a missing end cap, creating a sharp edge that was not identified or corrected prior to use. The affected resident had been admitted with multiple diagnoses, including Peripheral Vascular Disease, Malnutrition, Chronic Kidney Disease, Depression, and Alzheimer’s Disease, and had a BIMS score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident was receiving hospice services and required extensive assistance of one staff person with transfers, as documented in the care plan. On the date of the incident, a CNA assisted the resident with a transfer from a wheelchair to the bed. During this transfer, the resident’s left lower leg rubbed against the enabler bar that had the missing end cap and sharp edge. Nursing documentation recorded that the CNA called an LPN to the room and the LPN observed a large laceration on the resident’s left lower leg with bleeding, which the CNA reported had occurred during the transfer. The LPN noted that the enabler bar had a missing end cap, resulting in a sharp edge, and that the resident’s leg had contacted this area during the transfer. The resident was sent to the emergency department, where records described a very large stellate laceration measuring 25.5 cm on the lateral left lower leg, extending deep to the fascia and requiring extensive cleaning and a complicated repair with internal and external sutures, as well as a tetanus vaccination. Subsequent physician notes documented that the wound required ongoing assessment, daily wound care, and two courses of Bactrim DS due to the extent and depth of the laceration and delayed healing, with sutures removed in stages over several weeks.
Failure to Maintain Required Daily RN Coverage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse (RN) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days a week, as required. Review of the time card report for staff member S5RN from 02/22/2026 through 03/24/2026 showed that on five specific dates—02/25/2026, 02/26/2026, 02/27/2026, 02/28/2026, and 03/01/2026—there were fewer than 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage, with recorded work times of 6.50, 7.48, 6.48, 7.50, and 7.50 hours respectively. During an interview on 03/25/2026 at 9:35 a.m., the Administrator (S1) confirmed that S5RN was the only RN scheduled between 02/22/2026 and 03/21/2026 and acknowledged that the facility did not have 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage on the identified dates. No additional information was provided in the report regarding specific residents, their medical conditions, or any clinical events occurring during the periods without full RN coverage.
Failure to Maintain Adequate Supply of Clean Towels and Bed Linens
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide residents with a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment by not ensuring the consistent availability of clean bath towels and bed linens. The facility’s own Facility Assessment Tool, updated on 03/23/2026, identified bed and bath linen as non-medical supplies for which PAR levels must be maintained at all times to ensure adequate supplies. Despite this, multiple interviews and record reviews showed that clean linens and towels were often unavailable. One resident, admitted on 12/05/2022 with diagnoses including diffuse traumatic brain injury and allergic rhinitis and a BIMS score of 15 (no cognitive impairment), reported that bath towels and bed linens were often unavailable, most recently during the week of 03/15/2026 through 03/21/2026. Another resident, admitted on 07/12/2023 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus and asthma and a BIMS score of 15, had filed a grievance on 01/10/2026 reporting that personal bath towels and sheets were missing from the laundry and later reported that family had to provide personal linens because the facility frequently lacked bath towels and bed linens. Staff interviews corroborated these reports: a laundry staff member stated the facility frequently did not have clean bath towels and bed linens available for residents; a CNA reported that clean bath towels and bed linens were unavailable for residents during the week of 03/08/2026 through 03/14/2026; and the ADON confirmed that the facility did not have clean bath towels and bed linens available for residents on 03/23/2026. This pattern of unavailability affected the facility’s census of 58 residents.
Failure to Report Resident Elopement to State Survey Agency
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to report a resident elopement to the State Survey Agency as required by state law and by the facility’s own Wandering and Elopement Policy dated 11/15/2023. That policy directs that when a resident returns after an elopement, the DON or charge nurse must examine the resident, notify the attending physician, complete an incident/accident report, document the event in the medical record, and notify regulatory agencies per state guidelines. Record review showed that one resident, admitted on 01/09/2026, had multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, cognitive communication deficit, aphasia, muscle wasting and atrophy, gait and mobility abnormalities, disorientation, unspecified dementia with anxiety, psychotic and mood disturbance, anxiety disorder, and essential hypertension. A Quarterly MDS documented a BIMS score of 4, indicating severely impaired cognition, and the resident was assessed as an elopement risk level 3 due to a history of attempted elopement at home, wandering with purpose in the facility, and exit-seeking behavior. Progress notes and interviews confirmed that on 02/08/2026 the resident was found outside the facility alone in the flower bed at the front of the building, bent over with hands in the dirt, by an oncoming nurse arriving for her shift. The LPN reported she parked her car, went to assist the resident, and alerted staff inside that the resident was outside alone. The resident’s responsible party similarly reported that the resident had been found outside alone in front of the facility on that date. During interview, the Administrator confirmed that the resident, who had dementia and a BIMS score of 4, had been found outside in the flower bed in front of the facility and acknowledged that this incident was not reported to the State Survey Agency, constituting a failure to report the elopement in accordance with state law and facility policy.
Failure to Revise Care Plan After Elopement and Development of Diabetic Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to revise a resident’s comprehensive care plan following significant changes in condition, specifically an elopement and the development of a diabetic ulcer. The resident was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, cognitive communication deficit, aphasia, muscle wasting and atrophy at multiple sites, gait and mobility abnormalities, disorientation, unspecified dementia with associated anxiety, psychotic and mood disturbances, an anxiety disorder, and essential hypertension. Progress notes documented that the resident was found outside the facility in a flower bed, bent over with hands in the dirt, after having eloped from the building. Further review of the resident’s progress notes showed that a diabetic ulcer was identified on the resident’s right heel the day after the elopement. Despite these documented changes in condition, review of the resident’s comprehensive care plan revealed no revisions to address the actual elopement event or the new diabetic ulcer on the right heel. During an interview, the MDS Coordinator confirmed that the resident’s care plan should have been revised to reflect both the elopement and the development of the diabetic ulcer, but it was not.
Failure to Implement and Document Diabetic Foot and Heel Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan for a resident with diabetes and multiple comorbidities. The resident was admitted with type 2 diabetes mellitus, cognitive communication deficit, aphasia, muscle wasting and atrophy, gait and mobility abnormalities, disorientation, unspecified dementia with associated psychiatric symptoms, anxiety disorder, and hypertension. On admission, the Minimum Data Set and skin assessment documented a deep tissue injury on the right heel. A nurse practitioner’s progress note dated shortly after admission described a deep tissue injury on the right heel being treated with gentian violet and foam and noted the heel was tender to touch. However, there were no corresponding physician’s orders for wound care treatment on the January and early February physician order sheets, and the treatment administration records for that same period showed no wound care treatments provided. The resident’s care plan for diabetes included an approach to check the body for breaks in the skin and treat promptly as ordered by the physician, but the facility did not develop and implement specific approaches addressing the documented right heel injury. A wound care nurse’s progress note later identified a diabetic ulcer on the right heel, described as tender and spongy, and documented application of gentian violet–soaked gauze and foam dressing. Only then was a physician’s order written to monitor the right heel and apply gentian violet dampened gauze and a protective dressing on specified days, with the treatment administration record showing documentation of these treatments on only three dates. The resident’s responsible party reported that the resident was discharged and subsequently required emergency department treatment for cellulitis due to a diabetic ulcer on the right heel, for which antibiotics were prescribed. The wound care nurse confirmed the initial documentation of a deep tissue injury without any physician’s orders for treatment and that the diabetic ulcer was not identified until nearly a month after admission, and the nurse practitioner confirmed he examined the right heel only once during that period.
Failure to Follow Hand Hygiene and Glove Protocols During Incontinence Care
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain an infection prevention and control program during incontinence care, specifically related to hand hygiene, glove use, and handling of soiled linens. The facility’s own policy for bladder incontinence care requires staff to perform handwashing or use alcohol gel, don disposable gloves, cleanse the perineal and anal areas, then remove and discard gloves and perform hand hygiene before proceeding. During observed incontinence care for one resident, a CNA donned clean gloves and used perineal wipes to remove bowel movement from the resident’s buttocks, then, without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene, placed a clean incontinence pad and brief under the resident. The CNA placed a soiled brief and urine-soaked bed pad at the foot of the bed on top of the resident’s clean comforter, then disposed of the soiled brief in the trash, spread a clean incontinence pad on the bed, and secured a clean brief, all without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. The same CNA continued to touch the resident’s clean clothing, body, wheelchair armrests, and room door, transferred the resident to the wheelchair, and moved the resident into the hallway, then returned to retrieve the soiled incontinence pad and carried it down the hall to the soiled linen barrel before finally disposing of gloves, again without any observed hand hygiene during the entire episode of care. In a separate observation involving another resident, two CNAs provided incontinence care without performing hand hygiene before donning gloves. One CNA removed bowel movement from the resident’s buttocks, discarded the soiled brief, removed soiled gloves, and donned clean gloves without hand hygiene, then touched the resident’s extremities, bed linens, and applied a clean brief and incontinence pad. The CNA again changed gloves and dressed the resident in a clean gown, touching multiple body areas, without hand hygiene. The second CNA unfastened the brief, confirmed the resident remained soiled, wiped remaining stool, and helped secure the clean brief without changing soiled gloves or performing hand hygiene. Both CNAs later confirmed in interviews that they should have performed hand hygiene and changed gloves appropriately, and the DON confirmed staff are expected to change gloves when soiled or moving from contaminated to clean areas, sanitize hands between glove changes and between residents, and avoid placing soiled linen on clean linen.
Failure to Honor Resident Dignity and Discontinue Unnecessary Isolation Practices
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves failure to honor residents' rights to dignity and self-determination. One resident, who was lying in bed and requested a bedpan, was observed on 03/25/2026 at 8:59 a.m. using the call light with surveyor assistance. When the CNA entered the room, she stated the resident was wearing a diaper, could not get up due to left-sided weakness from a stroke, and said the resident "can go in her diaper" instead of providing a bedpan as requested. A COTA later reported that therapy had recommended the resident use a bedpan and had removed the bedside commode the previous day, and that the resident did not want to use a diaper. The COTA also stated the resident’s left arm was flaccid and that she required maximum assistance of two people. A second deficiency involved another resident who continued to receive meals on disposable dishware in the dining room after contact isolation precautions had been discontinued. This resident had diagnoses including vascular dementia, enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, and depression, and had a BIMS score of 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition. A physician order for single room isolation with contact precautions had been discontinued on 02/17/2026, yet on 03/23/2026 at 11:20 a.m., the resident was observed receiving a lunch tray on disposable dishware while seated in the dining room. The ADON confirmed the resident was no longer on contact precautions and should not have been receiving meals on disposable dishware.
Failure to Keep Call Light Within Reach for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a resident’s call light was accessible as required by facility policy and necessary to reasonably accommodate the resident’s needs. The facility’s policy on answering call lights, dated 01/16/2026, states that when a resident is in bed or confined to a chair, the call light must be within easy reach. Resident #3 was admitted on 12/07/2023 with diagnoses including mononeural disorder, paraplegia, epilepsy, and peripheral vascular disease. A quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/03/2026 documented a BIMS score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and showed the resident required setup assistance with eating, was dependent for toileting and personal hygiene, and needed substantial/maximal assistance to roll left to right. On multiple observations on 03/24/2026, surveyors found the resident’s call bell out of reach despite the resident’s reliance on it to express needs. At 10:12 a.m., the resident was lying in bed with eyes closed and the call bell was on the floor on the right side of the bed, not within reach. At 12:24 p.m., the resident was awake and alert in bed, and again the call bell was on the floor and not reachable; the resident stated he could not reach it. During an interview at 12:45 p.m., a CNA familiar with the resident confirmed the resident could express needs with short responses and used the call bell. At 12:48 p.m., with the CNA present, the call bell was still on the floor and not within reach, and the CNA acknowledged it should have been accessible. Later observations at 1:41 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. found the resident awake and alert in a reclined position in a Geri chair, with the call bell hanging on the side of the bed and again out of reach; the DON, present at 3:00 p.m., confirmed the call bell was not within reach and should have been.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
