Above average — CMS composite of the measures below.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Monterey Palms Health Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with post-stroke hemiplegia and moderate cognitive deficit alleged that a CNA hit his elbow away while providing perineal care and became upset when the CNA responded by calling him a liar and challenging his accusation. The CNA later admitted becoming angry and telling the resident he was lying about being hit. This interaction conflicted with facility policy and training that direct staff not to argue with residents, to use professional de-escalation techniques, and to walk away and give residents space when they become angry or accusatory.
Two residents did not receive their prescribed IV antibiotics as ordered, with doses being missed, given late, or not documented, and there was no evidence that the physician or pharmacy were notified when medications were unavailable. Nursing staff and the DON confirmed that medication administration and documentation did not follow facility policy.
Three residents with complex medical conditions did not have their medication administrations accurately documented, with multiple instances of late intravenous antibiotic and antifungal doses recorded in the MAR. Nursing staff and the DON confirmed that documentation did not always reflect the actual time of administration, contrary to facility policy requiring timely and accurate charting.
The facility failed to ensure proper food safety and sanitation practices. A dietary aide did not follow guidelines for testing sanitizer concentration, risking improper sanitization. A cook inadequately cleaned a prep counter after handling raw chicken, and another cook failed to monitor the cooling process of roast meat, risking foodborne illness. These deficiencies affected all residents receiving food from the kitchen.
The facility failed to adhere to dietary guidelines and portion control, impacting residents' nutritional needs. Dietary staff did not follow the Cooks spreadsheet for portion sizes, leading to incorrect servings of pureed foods. Additionally, recipes were not followed, affecting the consistency and flavor of meals. Residents on specific diets received inappropriate food items, and salad dressing was served without measuring, potentially affecting calorie and nutrient intake.
The facility failed to provide appetizing and properly tempered food, affecting seven residents. Multiple residents reported cold and unappetizing meals, with staff confirming issues such as lack of seasoning and delayed meal service. The facility's policy required tasting and quality checks, which were not adhered to, leading to this deficiency.
The facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment and adhere to food safety standards. Wet kitchen equipment, dust accumulation, and build-up on equipment were observed, posing contamination risks. Improper food storage and labeling practices were noted, along with unsanitary conditions such as a worn cutting board and cracked tiles. Personal items were stored inappropriately, and a staff member did not follow proper cleaning procedures after handling raw chicken, increasing the risk of foodborne illnesses.
A facility failed to create a care plan for a resident with a new diagnosis of pulmonary emboli on anticoagulant therapy. The resident, with moderate cognitive impairment, was readmitted with a prescription for Eliquis, but no care plan was documented to address the condition or medication management. The DON acknowledged the oversight, which was contrary to the facility's policy requiring an acute condition care plan.
A resident with cerebral infarction and end-stage renal disease was found with dirty fingernails, indicating a failure in maintaining proper hygiene. The facility's policy required daily nail care, but the routine was limited to Sundays. The infection preventionist and CNA acknowledged the oversight, and the DON confirmed the established routine, highlighting a deficiency in adhering to the care plan for maintaining resident dignity and comfort.
A resident was found with an outside pharmacy's Simvastatin medication at her bedside without a self-administration assessment, and expired Daptomycin IVPB bags were stored in the medication room refrigerator for another resident. The facility's policies on medication storage and self-administration were not followed, leading to potential risks for residents.
A resident was served a turkey sandwich despite documented preferences for cottage cheese and a dislike for turkey. The meal ticket indicated these preferences, but the resident did not receive the preferred food. The Dietary Manager confirmed the importance of honoring food preferences to prevent nutritional deficiencies. This incident reflects a failure to adhere to the facility's policies on serving foods and nutrition care.
The facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse, as observed when dumpster lids were not closed and trash was found on the ground. The Dietary Services Supervisor and Registered Dietitian acknowledged the issue, which could attract pests and cause infection control problems. The facility's policy requires dumpster areas to be clean and lids closed.
A facility failed to follow infection control measures for a resident with contact isolation precautions. Staff members entered the resident's room without wearing appropriate PPE, and one CNA used non-disposable equipment without proper disinfection. Interviews revealed a lack of understanding of infection control policies among staff, despite the resident's need for contact isolation due to an ESBL infection.
A resident with a history of stroke and Parkinson's disease was found unable to reach her call light, which was wrapped around the siderail, during a complaint investigation. The CNA confirmed the call light was not within reach, contrary to the resident's care plan and facility policy, which required call lights to be accessible to prevent falls.
The facility failed to ensure timely responses to call lights, as evidenced by two residents experiencing delays of up to an hour, leading to unmet care needs and feelings of embarrassment. Staff interviews and observations confirmed that call lights should be answered within 3-5 minutes, but this standard was not consistently met.
The facility failed to ensure that two out of three trash dumpster lids were securely closed, potentially attracting pests and creating an unsanitary environment. Staff acknowledged the importance of keeping lids closed, but the lids were sometimes left open because they were heavy and hard to close.
Failure to Treat Resident with Dignity During Dispute Over Alleged Hitting During Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity and respect when a CNA verbally responded inappropriately after the resident alleged being hit during care. The resident, who had hemiplegia/hemiparesis following a stroke and a BIMS score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive deficit, reported that while receiving perineal care he asked the CNA for a wipe and, when he reached for it, the CNA hit his elbow out of the way. The resident stated it was more than a push and that when he told the CNA, "You hit my elbow," the CNA yelled, "You're a liar." The resident reported that the CNA became mad at him, which upset and angered the resident. Progress notes indicated hospice staff reported the resident’s statement that the CNA hit his elbow while providing care. In a subsequent interview, the CNA acknowledged that during perineal care, when the resident asked, "Why did you hit me?" he became "a little angry" and told the resident, "You're lying," and further stated that he went out of his way for the resident and accused the resident of lying about being hit. The administrator, who serves as the abuse coordinator, stated that staff receive abuse training and that when a resident becomes angry or accusatory, staff are expected to walk away, give the resident space to calm down, and report to the charge nurse, and that the CNA should not have engaged with the resident by calling him a liar. Facility policy on Mood and Behavior Management Techniques directs staff not to argue with residents, to detach from resident agitation, and, if unsuccessful, to walk away and wait before re-approaching, which was not followed in this interaction.
Failure to Administer and Document Medications per Physician Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that pharmaceutical services met the needs of residents by not administering medications in accordance with physician orders for two residents. One resident, who was alert and oriented and had diagnoses including bacteremia, diabetes, and hypertension, reported receiving his antibiotic at inconsistent times. Review of his records showed that a scheduled dose of cefazolin was administered late and another dose was not documented as given. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) confirmed these discrepancies, and there was no evidence that the missed or late doses were communicated to the physician as required. Another resident, admitted with diagnoses including pneumonia, congestive heart failure, stroke, and end stage renal disease, had a physician order for vancomycin to be administered on specific days. The MAR indicated that two scheduled doses were not administered, with one dose noted as unavailable. Interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Nursing confirmed that medications were not given on time, not properly documented, and that neither the physician nor the pharmacy were notified when medication was unavailable. Facility policy required medications to be administered as prescribed, within 60 minutes of the scheduled time, and for administration to be recorded immediately, which was not followed in these cases.
Failure to Accurately Document Medication Administration Times
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, specifically regarding the accurate documentation of medication administration for three residents. For one resident with bacteremia, diabetes, and hypertension, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed multiple instances where the scheduled 7 a.m. dose of intravenous cefazolin was administered late, with times ranging from over an hour to more than three hours past the scheduled time. Despite these delays, the MAR sometimes included comments indicating the medication was given on time, while other entries noted the late administration. The resident reported receiving antibiotics late or early at times. Another resident with septicemia, congestive heart failure, and a history of stroke had a physician's order for daily intravenous ceftriaxone at 9:00 a.m. The MAR indicated that on two occasions, the medication was administered more than an hour late. Similarly, a third resident with Crohn's disease, ileocecal resection, and an ileostomy had a physician's order for daily intravenous fluconazole at 9:00 p.m., but the MAR showed the medication was administered over an hour late on one occasion. Interviews with the RN and DON confirmed that the MARs reflected late administration times, and both acknowledged that medication administration should be documented accurately and timely, with the MAR reflecting the actual time of administration. Facility policies reviewed stated that charting should be factual, accurate, and timely, and that medications should be administered within 60 minutes of the scheduled time, with immediate documentation following administration.
Deficiencies in Food Safety and Sanitation Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that dietary staff safely and effectively carried out the functions of food and nutrition services, as evidenced by several observations and interviews. Dietary Aide 2 did not adhere to the manufacturer's guidelines for testing the Quaternary sanitizer, which is crucial for sanitizing food contact surfaces. Instead of dipping the test strip for the required 10 seconds, DA 2 only dipped it for 1 second, potentially leading to a false reading of the sanitizer concentration. This deviation from protocol was confirmed by the Registered Dietitian, who emphasized the importance of following the manufacturer's guidelines to ensure proper sanitization. Additionally, Cook 2 did not follow the proper cleaning procedures after preparing raw chicken. The prep counter was observed with pink chicken juice, and CK 2 only used sanitizing wipes to clean the surface, rather than following the necessary steps of washing, rinsing, air drying, and sanitizing. This improper cleaning method was identified as a hazard for foodborne pathogens by the Registered Dietitian, who reiterated the importance of adhering to the facility's cleaning procedures to prevent contamination. Furthermore, Cook 1 demonstrated a lack of understanding of the proper cooling process for food. CK 1 began cooling roast meat from 140 degrees F and stored it in the refrigerator, checking the temperature only after 14 hours. The Registered Dietitian explained that the cooling process should involve monitoring the temperature every 2 hours to ensure it reaches 70 degrees F within 2 hours and 40 degrees F within an additional 4 hours. The failure to monitor the cooling process properly posed a food safety risk, as it could allow bacteria or viruses to grow on the roast meat, potentially leading to foodborne illness for the residents.
Failure to Follow Dietary Guidelines and Portion Control
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the menus, recipes, and Cooks spreadsheet were followed, resulting in deficiencies in meeting the nutritional needs of residents. On two separate occasions, dietary staff did not adhere to the specified portion sizes for pureed food items as outlined in the Cooks spreadsheet. Specifically, on January 27, 2025, CK 1 used incorrect scoop sizes for pureed beef pot pie and cauliflower, and on January 28, 2025, CK 2 used incorrect scoop sizes for pureed chicken and white rice. This led to residents on pureed diets receiving incorrect amounts of food, potentially affecting their nutritional intake. Additionally, the preparation of pureed cauliflower on January 27, 2025, did not follow the standardized recipe, resulting in a runny consistency that was not appealing or appetizing. CK 1 added unmeasured hot water to the cauliflower, which diluted its nutritional value. The facility's policy emphasized the importance of using standardized recipes to ensure meals are attractive and provide necessary nutritive value, which was not adhered to in this instance. Further deficiencies were observed when CK 2 failed to add margarine and seasoning to buttered corn, affecting the flavor and potentially decreasing residents' meal intake. Moreover, dietary staff served ice cream instead of chilled pears to residents on low fat, low cholesterol, and cardiac diets, contrary to the Cooks spreadsheet instructions. Lastly, the Dietary Services Supervisor served salad dressing without measuring, which could lead to incorrect calorie and nutrient intake. These actions demonstrate a lack of adherence to established procedures and policies, potentially impacting the nutritional well-being of the residents.
Failure to Provide Palatable and Properly Tempered Food
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policy and procedure for providing appetizing and palatable food at appropriate temperatures according to residents' preferences. This deficiency was identified for seven out of 89 sample residents. Multiple residents reported that the food was often cold and unappetizing. Specific instances included Resident 96 stating the food was cold most of the time, Resident 43 expressing the need for warm and timely dinner service, and Resident 82 describing the food as terrible and cold. Additionally, Resident 84 mentioned cold eggs, and Resident 23 noted that the food was often cold and did not taste well. Resident 99 also expressed dissatisfaction with the food. Observations and interviews with staff further confirmed these issues. During a test tray evaluation, the Registered Dietician (RD) confirmed that the Buttered Corn and Lemon Pepper Chicken lacked flavor and seasoning. The Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS) acknowledged that scrambled and pureed eggs were served cold, with temperatures recorded at 101 F and 100 F, respectively. The DSS attributed the cold food to delays in passing meal trays. The facility's policy required cooks to taste all food before serving to ensure adequate seasoning and quality, and for the DSS and RD to routinely check prepared food for portion control, seasoning, quality, and correct consistency. However, these procedures were not followed, leading to the deficiency.
Sanitation and Food Safety Deficiencies in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment and adhere to professional standards for food service and safety. Observations revealed that kitchen equipment was improperly stored while still wet, which could lead to the transmission of microorganisms. Dust accumulation was noted on several surfaces, including door frames and vents in the walk-in refrigerator, posing a risk of food contamination. Additionally, there was a significant build-up on various kitchen equipment, such as the blender, ice machine, and storage shelves, which were not cleaned and sanitized as required. Food storage practices were also found to be inadequate. Two opened tortillas were left exposed to the air in the walk-in refrigerator, and ground beef was placed for defrosting without proper labeling. These practices could compromise food quality and safety, increasing the risk of foodborne illnesses. Furthermore, a strainer with brown spots, possibly rust, was observed, and cracked tiles in the dishwashing area presented potential hazards for contamination and pest attraction. Personal items were improperly stored in the kitchen's storage area, and a cutting board was found to be worn and unsanitary. Additionally, a staff member failed to follow proper cleaning procedures after preparing raw chicken, using only sanitary wipes instead of the required wash, rinse, and sanitize steps. These deficiencies collectively posed a significant risk of foodborne illnesses to the facility's residents, who are a medically vulnerable population.
Failure to Develop Care Plan for Resident with Pulmonary Emboli
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for a resident with a new diagnosis of pulmonary emboli who was on anticoagulant treatment. The resident, identified as having moderate cognitive impairment and lacking the capacity to make medical decisions, was readmitted to the facility with a diagnosis of pulmonary emboli and a new prescription for Eliquis, an anticoagulant medication. Despite the resident's condition and treatment requirements, there was no documented evidence of a care plan addressing the signs and symptoms of pulmonary emboli or the management of the anticoagulant therapy. The deficiency was identified during a review of the resident's records and an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the MDS Coordinator. The DON acknowledged that a care plan specific to the resident's new diagnosis and medication was not developed, despite the facility's policy requiring an acute condition plan of care to be created when an acute condition is identified. This oversight had the potential to delay necessary care and services, placing the resident at risk for further complications related to their condition and treatment.
Failure to Maintain Resident's Fingernail Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the cleanliness and proper hygiene of a resident's fingernails, which was observed during a survey. The resident, who had a history of cerebral infarction with left-sided weakness, osteomyelitis, and end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis, was found with blackish material under the fingernails of the right hand. The resident expressed a desire to have the nails cleaned, indicating that they had been in this condition for some time. The facility's infection preventionist and a CNA acknowledged the need for nail cleaning, noting that the resident's nails should have been cleaned before hemodialysis treatment. The facility's policy indicated that nail care should include daily cleaning and regular trimming to prevent infections and promote circulation. However, the facility had established a routine where nail cleaning and shaving were scheduled only on Sundays. This routine was confirmed by the Director of Nursing, who stated that CNAs were responsible for checking and maintaining the cleanliness of all residents' nails. The deficiency in providing necessary care and services for the resident's fingernail hygiene was identified as a failure to adhere to the facility's policy and the resident's care plan, which aimed to provide assistance in activities of daily living to maintain comfort and dignity.
Improper Medication Storage and Expired Antibiotics Found
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications and biologicals, as evidenced by two separate incidents involving residents. In the first incident, a resident was found with a bottle of Simvastatin medication from an outside pharmacy at her bedside. The resident, who was alert but with some confusion, stated she intended to take the medication in the evening. The medication was not part of the facility's supply, and there was no record of a medication self-administration assessment for the resident prior to the discovery. Interviews with the LVN and QA nurse confirmed that the medication should not have been at the resident's bedside, as it was not dispensed by the facility's pharmacy. In the second incident, three expired Daptomycin antibiotic IVPB bags were found in the medication room refrigerator for another resident. The bags had expired several days prior to the observation, and the RN acknowledged that the expired medications should have been discarded. The IP nurse and DON confirmed that licensed nurses were responsible for ensuring expired medications were not stored and that administering expired antibiotics could result in ineffective treatment. The facility's policies on medication storage and self-administration were reviewed, indicating that medications should be stored properly and that assessments should be conducted to determine a resident's capability for self-administration. However, these policies were not followed, leading to the potential for residents to self-administer medication without monitoring and to receive expired or ineffective medications.
Failure to Honor Resident's Food Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor a resident's food preferences, as evidenced by an incident involving a resident who was served a turkey sandwich despite having a documented dislike for turkey and a preference for cottage cheese. During an observation, it was noted that the resident's meal ticket clearly indicated these preferences, yet the resident was observed eating a turkey sandwich. The resident expressed that she did not like turkey sandwiches but chose not to mention it to the staff. The Restorative Nurse Assistant confirmed that the resident did not receive cottage cheese as preferred and did not like the turkey sandwich. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the importance of honoring residents' food preferences and offering alternatives, noting that failure to do so could lead to decreased food intake, weight loss, and nutritional deficiency. The facility's policy on serving foods requires the use of meal tickets to ensure tray accuracy and adherence to resident preferences. Additionally, the facility's nutrition care policy mandates that resident food preferences be documented and identified on tray cards, with appropriate substitutions offered for dislikes. This incident highlights a lapse in following these established procedures, potentially compromising the resident's nutritional and medical status.
Improper Disposal of Garbage and Refuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse, as observed on January 27, 2025. During an inspection of the dumpster area outside the back kitchen, it was noted that the lids of a white recycle dumpster and one of the black trash dumpsters were not closed. Additionally, trash items such as used gloves, forks, napkins, and opened cut boxes were found scattered on the floor surrounding the dumpsters. The Dietary Services Supervisor confirmed the presence of trash on the ground and acknowledged that the dumpster lids needed to be closed at all times to prevent pest attraction and infection control issues. Further interviews with the Registered Dietitian reinforced the necessity of keeping dumpster lids closed to minimize odors and prevent pest attraction and infection control problems. The facility's Policy and Procedure on Pest Control, dated 2018, mandates that dumpster areas be kept clean and sanitized, with trash receptacles covered at all times and dumpster lids closed. The failure to adhere to these procedures was identified as a deficiency by the surveyors.
Inadequate Infection Control Practices for Contact Isolation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to infection control measures for a resident requiring contact isolation precautions. Multiple staff members were observed entering and exiting the resident's room without wearing the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Specifically, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered the room to answer a call light and provide water without wearing a gown, gloves, or mask. Another CNA entered the room to perform vital sign monitoring without using a disposable blood pressure cuff or wearing PPE, and incorrectly used bleach wipes for hand hygiene upon exiting the room. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of understanding and adherence to the facility's infection control policies. One CNA incorrectly believed that PPE was only necessary for direct patient care and not for brief interactions, and was unable to articulate the proper method for disinfecting equipment. In contrast, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) correctly stated that PPE should be worn whenever entering a room with contact precautions. The resident in question was admitted with a urinary tract infection and had a physician's order for contact isolation due to an ESBL infection in the urine. The facility's policy required the use of PPE and dedicated equipment for residents under contact precautions.
Call Light Accessibility Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that basic accommodations of needs were provided when a resident's call light was not within reach. During an unannounced visit for a complaint investigation, it was observed that a resident, who was sitting in a wheelchair at the foot of her bed, had her call light wrapped around the right siderail, making it inaccessible. The resident confirmed in an interview that she was unable to reach her call light and could not call for help. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) also acknowledged that the call light was not within reach and stated that call lights should be accessible to residents in wheelchairs. The resident involved had a medical history of cerebral infarction (stroke) and Parkinson's disease, and her care plan indicated an increased susceptibility to falling, with a specific approach to keep the call light within reach. The facility's policy on call lights also required that they be placed within the resident's reach when leaving the room.
Failure to Timely Respond to Call Lights
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that call lights were answered in a timely manner, as evidenced by the experiences of two residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident 1, who had diagnoses including glioblastoma, left-sided hemiplegia, and muscle wasting, reported that call light response times were often over 30 minutes and sometimes up to an hour, particularly during evening or night shifts. On one occasion, Resident 1 did not receive assistance in time and soiled herself, leading to feelings of embarrassment and humiliation. Resident 5, who had diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), muscle wasting, and congestive heart disease, also reported similar delays in call light responses, sometimes up to an hour. Both residents had documented capacity to make decisions and were aware of their needs for assistance. During the survey, it was observed that call lights were not answered promptly. For instance, Resident 5 activated her call light at 2:00 p.m., and it was not answered until 2:10 p.m. by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Interviews with facility staff, including CNAs, a Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA), and a Registered Nurse (RN), confirmed that call lights should be answered within 3-5 minutes to prevent accidents and assist with resident needs. The facility's policy documents also indicated that call lights should be answered in a timely manner to meet residents' needs and uphold their dignity. However, the observed delays in response times indicated a failure to adhere to these policies, potentially compromising resident care and dignity.
Failure to Securely Close Trash Dumpster Lids
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two out of three trash dumpster lids were securely closed, which had the potential to attract pests, insects, and vermin, creating an unsanitary environment for the residents. During an unannounced visit, one dumpster near the kitchen was observed with its lid open and flies flying in and out, while another dumpster near the property line was also found with its lid open and filled with broken-down cardboard. The Administrator, Director of Nursing, Janitor, Dietary Supervisor, Director of Maintenance, Housekeeper, and Housekeeping Supervisor all acknowledged the importance of keeping the dumpster lids closed to prevent pests and odors. The facility's document titled 'Pest Control' indicated that dumpster lids should be kept closed to maintain cleanliness and prevent pest infestations. The 2022 FDA Food Code also mandates that refuse, recyclables, and returnables be stored in covered receptacles to be inaccessible to insects and rodents. Despite these guidelines, the dumpster lids were left open, posing a risk to the sanitary conditions of the facility. Interviews with various staff members revealed that the dumpster lids were sometimes left open because they were heavy and hard to close.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 125 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Palm Desert
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rancho Mirage Health And Rehabilitation Center | 2.4 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Desert Springs Post Acute | 2.8 mi | ★★★★★ | 39 | 0 |
| The Springs Healthcare Center At The Carlotta | 3.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 3 | 0 |
| Bayshire Rancho Mirage | 3.7 mi | ★★★★★ | 1 | 0 |
| Desert Springs Healthcare & Wellness Centre | 9.2 mi | ★★★★★ | 13 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Monterey Palms Health Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 2026) and official state health department websites.