Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Missing Physician/NP Documentation in Electronic Medical Records

Brownsville, Texas Survey Completed on 03-25-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain complete and accurate clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards for two residents. For the first resident, an older male with multiple complex diagnoses including cerebral infarction with right-sided involvement, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, end-stage renal disease on dialysis, and Type 2 diabetes mellitus, the electronic medical record lacked any physician or nurse practitioner documentation over an extended period. The resident’s MDS showed he was nonverbal, rarely/never understood or able to understand others, and was fully dependent for toileting, showering, and personal hygiene, with continuous bladder and bowel incontinence. Nursing progress notes documented that a family nurse practitioner (FNP) assessed the resident on several dates in January, February, and March and made medication changes and follow-up plans, but there were no corresponding physician or NP notes entered in the Progress Notes or Miscellaneous sections of the electronic record from 01/21/2026 through 03/24/2026. For the second resident, an older female with diagnoses including hypertension, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart disease, and other toxic encephalopathy, the facility similarly failed to maintain physician or NP documentation in the electronic record. Her MDS reflected a BIMS score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, with clear speech and usual ability to understand and be understood, and a need for substantial/maximal assistance with toileting and showering, along with frequent bladder and occasional bowel incontinence. A nursing progress note documented that an NP was in the facility, was notified of the resident’s high blood sugar and the family’s request to review and discontinue some medications, and that the NP acted on this request. However, there were no physician or NP notes in the Progress Notes or Miscellaneous sections for this resident from 02/21/2026 through 03/24/2026. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed that the absence of provider documentation in the electronic medical record was inconsistent with facility expectations and policy. The DON stated that physicians and NPs should have notes in the Progress Notes or Miscellaneous sections of the electronic chart, and that they typically wrote notes on paper which were then uploaded into the Miscellaneous tab. She acknowledged not knowing why the two residents’ charts lacked doctor or NP notes and stated that if such notes were not in the computer, the resident’s progress or status would not be shown. The Administrator similarly stated that there should be physician and NP notes in the electronic system and that providers were usually on their computers while in the facility, but she did not know how or why there were no notes for these two residents. The facility’s “Documentation in Medical Record” policy required that each resident’s record contain an accurate representation of the resident’s experiences, with complete, accurate, and timely documentation of assessments, observations, and services, completed at the time of service or by the end of the shift, and containing sufficient detail about the resident’s care and responses to care.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙