Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
E

Failure to Maintain Accessible Call Lights for Fall-Risk Residents

Oakland, California Survey Completed on 03-16-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement fall-risk care plan interventions by not ensuring that call lights were within reach for two residents identified as at risk for falls. Resident 1, who had diagnoses including a vertebral compression fracture and repeated falls, was observed standing from her bed, using a walker, and ambulating to the bathroom unassisted, appearing unsteady. A CNA stated that this resident required staff assistance to the bathroom due to fall risk and was supposed to call for help. When asked for the call light, the resident, who was hard of hearing, did not understand, and the CNA found the call light on the floor behind a nightstand that was not close to the bed. The CNA then attached the call light to the bed and instructed the resident on its use. Resident 1’s care plan for fall risk included an intervention to ensure the call light was within reach and to encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. Resident 2, with diagnoses including seizures and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, was also identified as a fall risk with a weak right side. During observation, this resident was lying in bed asleep, and a CNA reported the resident had not called that day. When asked about the call light, the CNA located it on the floor, then attached it to the resident’s pillow, acknowledging it should not have been on the floor and should be reachable. The CNA admitted that during the last round, she did not check whether the call light was within reach. Resident 2 had a prior unwitnessed fall while self-transferring from bed to wheelchair, and the care plan documented a risk for injury due to a fall with a goal of no further falls. Facility staff, including a LVN and the DON, stated that call lights should always be within arm’s reach of residents, consistent with facility policies on the call system and fall risk management, which require providing residents a means to call staff and identifying interventions to prevent falls.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙