Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0565
E

Failure to Provide Written Responses to Resident Council Concerns

Claremore, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 03-04-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor residents' rights to have their resident council concerns and recommendations addressed by not obtaining written responses from responsible department heads and administration. A Resident Council Response Form dated 01/08/26 documented council concerns about the nursing department, including slow call light response, with a directive for the DON to respond in writing by 01/22/26; however, no written response from the DON was recorded on the form. The same form also documented concerns about the dietary department, including requests for fresh fruit and a more varied menu, and concerns about the housekeeping department, including the need for clothing labels, with written responses due from those departments by the same date; no written responses from dietary or housekeeping were documented on the form. A subsequent Resident Council Response Form dated 02/05/26 showed additional council concerns regarding administration, specifically that exterior doors could be opened from the outside without a code, and concerns about housekeeping related to resident rooms not being cleaned, with written responses due from the administrator and housekeeping supervisor by 02/17/26; no written responses were documented from either. The SSD reported being responsible for taking resident council minutes, recording concerns on the response form, and providing the form to the appropriate department heads, and stated that department heads did not always respond to the council’s concerns. The housekeeping supervisor stated they signed and returned the response form but did not document a response, and the dietary manager stated they did not always respond to the council in writing. The administrator identified 87 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙