Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Hospice Status and Diabetes Medication

Raleigh, North Carolina Survey Completed on 02-12-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves inaccurate coding of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents. One resident with active diagnoses including anemia, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus elected hospice services on 1/19/26, as documented on an Election of Benefits for Hospice form. However, the resident’s admission MDS assessment dated later in January did not indicate that she was receiving hospice care. During interview, the MDS Coordinator stated he relied on the census report when completing the MDS and that the census report had not been updated to reflect the resident’s hospice admission, resulting in the hospice status not being captured on the MDS. The Administrator confirmed that MDS assessments should accurately reflect a resident’s hospice status. The second resident was admitted with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and had a physician’s order for Ozempic (semaglutide) to be administered subcutaneously once weekly for diabetes management. The medical record and MARs for October and November did not show any orders or documentation for insulin administration, but the November MAR documented administration of Ozempic on 11/1/25. The resident’s quarterly MDS assessment indicated that the resident received one insulin injection in the last seven days. In interview, the MDS nurse reported she coded the MDS to show one insulin injection based on the Ozempic administration, explaining she believed that because Ozempic was ordered for diabetes, it should be coded as insulin. The MDS Director clarified that Ozempic is not insulin and should not be coded as such, and the Administrator stated that MDS assessments should accurately reflect the medications residents receive.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙