Failure to Prevent Neglect Due to Inadequate Staffing and Improper Transfers
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to protect multiple residents from neglect by not providing sufficient, qualified staff and by allowing untrained aides to perform transfers and incontinence care alone, contrary to the facility assessment, policies, and care plans. Timecard review showed that on 34 of 84 shifts between early January and mid-February, only one direct care staff member was on duty, despite the facility assessment requiring at least two direct care staff and one nurse per shift when residents required mechanical lifts or two-person transfers. The AIT and ADON both acknowledged ongoing staffing shortages, frequent no-shows, and that resident care suffered because the facility was short staffed. The AIT stated it was not safe to have only one aide working on the floor and that policies requiring two staff for transfers and incontinent care were not always followed. One resident with dementia, severe cognitive impairment, and a care plan requiring two staff and a mechanical lift for transfers was dropped during a mechanical lift transfer performed by a single aide who was not certified and had no documented training or abuse/neglect education. The resident reported being dropped to the floor, then pulled back into the wheelchair and told not to report the fall; her roommate, who had moderate cognitive impairment, stated she saw the aide alone with the lift, heard the aide exclaim, and observed the resident and lift on the floor. The resident was later found dragging her leg, reported pain, and was hospitalized with a distal femur fracture requiring surgery. The aide later stated she had not been trained on mechanical lift use and denied transferring the resident alone, while another aide and a nurse gave conflicting accounts and denied assisting with the transfer. Another resident with severe cognitive impairment and a care plan requiring two-person mechanical lift transfers was observed being transferred by a single aide using a stand-and-pivot method without a mechanical lift. The aide admitted she was the only aide working, knew the resident required a mechanical lift and two staff, and stated she routinely transferred the resident this way because no help was available. A third resident, with moderate cognitive impairment and high fall risk, required prompt response to call lights and assistance with transfers and toileting. She activated her call light to request help to the restroom, but no staff were present in the hall or at the nurses’ station; after waiting, she attempted to go alone, urinated on herself, slipped, and was found on the floor by a hospice aide while the call light was still engaged. The AIT confirmed that only one aide was on duty that shift, that staff no-shows were common, and did not explain why she and the ADON, who were in the office, did not answer call lights. A fourth resident with moderate cognitive impairment, colon cancer, muscle weakness, and a high fall risk had multiple falls over several weeks, including two falls on the same day that resulted in rib fractures, pleural effusion, and hospitalization, and another fall causing a forehead injury. Progress notes documented repeated falls related to attempts to transfer or reach items independently, and the resident’s representative reported the resident was anxious and tried to get up on her own. The care plan for falls had not been updated with new interventions since several months prior, despite the series of falls. Timecards showed that during at least two of the resident’s falls, only one direct care staff member was on duty. A fifth resident with severe cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, mixed bladder incontinence, and a care plan requiring staff assistance for toileting and checks/changes every two hours was left in wet clothing for approximately two hours after requesting help. She first asked the only aide on duty, who told her she was too busy. The resident was later observed crying in the hall and then sitting in the dining room with visibly wet pants. When she asked an RN to change her, the RN looked at her but did not acknowledge the request. The resident became upset and attempted to remove her wet clothes in the dining room, after which the ADON reprimanded her and told her to go to her room. She was not assisted with changing until about two hours after her initial request. The aide later stated she was working alone, was very busy, and acknowledged that being short staffed could lead to residents not getting the care they needed and could be considered neglect. Personnel file reviews showed that aides designated as nurse aides were not certified and lacked documented training, including mechanical lift training and, in at least one case, abuse/neglect training. The facility’s policies required two staff for mechanical lift transfers and prohibited aides from performing transfers and incontinent care alone, and the facility’s abuse and neglect policy defined neglect as failure to provide necessary goods and services to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. The MD stated his expectation that residents be free from abuse and neglect, that policies be followed, and that residents’ needs be met by staff with the knowledge and skills to provide necessary care, and he confirmed that being dropped from a mechanical lift could cause the type of femur fracture sustained by one resident and that not following transfer policies could have led to injury for another resident. An Immediate Jeopardy situation was identified related to these failures.
Removal Plan
- Ensure there are two direct care staff on the floor at all times in addition to one LVN/RN charge nurse; if there are any mechanical lift residents, ensure a total of one LVN/RN and two direct care staff are in the building at all times; assess staffing requirements weekly based on census and resident needs; maintain two direct care staff if the facility has any residents that use a mechanical lift or are a two-person transfer.
- Ensure DON and ADON verify that all agency or temporary direct care staff have documented training/credentials prior to working a shift (including checking the agency portal and obtaining CNA credentials from the sister facility) and ongoing.
- Assess Residents #5, #3, #2, and #16 for any further injury, pain, or emotional distress.
- Report Resident #1's fall to the state agency per reporting requirements.
- Assess and monitor Resident #1 for negative outcomes.
- Remove NA-A from resident care pending investigation.
- Complete investigation of the incident by AIT.
- Terminate NA-A as disciplinary action.
- Create an informational handout for incident reporting and mechanical lift use and review it.
- Provide an instructional mechanical lift demonstration for all staff by the facility's COTA.
- Review incidents within the last 30 days to identify other residents at risk.
- Re-educate all direct care nursing staff on shift on abuse/neglect policy (including safe transfer procedures and supervision expectations) with a signature sheet; require review for all direct care staff before start of first shift.
- Provide abuse/neglect and related education at an in-service with a signature page.
- Ensure the agency and sister facility only send CNAs.
- Require the charge nurse to verbally educate any agency and sister facility staff on call lights, mechanical lift, and abuse/neglect during shift report prior to the aide starting the shift; require verbal return instruction to determine competency.
- Re-educate all residents about their rights, abuse, neglect, and reporting.
- Review abuse, neglect, transfers, and reporting upon hire; provide monthly review at mandatory in-service; provide one-on-one education annually at staff hire anniversary; enforce that any violations of policy will result in termination.
- Require the charge nurse to initial, date, and log the name of each agency and sister facility staff member educated.
- Complete a mandatory all-staff in-service reviewing falls and fall prevention, reporting incidents, mechanical lift transfers, and abuse and neglect.
- Reinforce expectation that violations of abuse/neglect, mechanical lift, and reporting policies will result in disciplinary action up to and including immediate termination.
- Train all staff on falls and call light usage via phone calls with return instruction to ensure retention of information; prevent staff who do not answer the phone from returning to work until retrained; maintain a DON log of staff contacted and educated.
- Have DON/designee review all incidents daily for 30 days to establish a risk-of-incident analysis based on patterns of staffing and incidents.
- Conduct a monthly abuse/neglect audit for direct care staff and incidents and report to QAPI for 3 months.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
A CNA aggressively slapped and grabbed a resident’s wrist during lunch feeding assistance, then roughly pulled the resident’s hand off his shirt sleeve after she had grabbed it. The CNA had prior disciplinary actions, including a previous feeding incident in which a resident choked and required the Heimlich maneuver. A nurse later assessed the resident and found no bruises or cuts.
A facility failed to protect two residents from resident-to-resident physical abuse. In one incident, a resident with dementia and cognitive impairment was struck during a dispute over TV volume and responded by scratching the other resident. In another, a resident with dementia and physically aggressive behaviors scratched a roommate’s face, leaving superficial marks. Staff interviews and clinical records confirmed both altercations and the resulting injuries.
A resident with a left ankle fracture, muscle weakness, and total-assist transfer needs was supposed to receive 2-person assistance and remain NWB on the left leg. Instead, a nurse aide transferred the resident with only one staff member during a toilet-to-wheelchair transfer, and the resident heard a pop and developed increased pain. X-ray and hospital imaging confirmed fractures of the distal R tibia and fibula, and the facility substantiated neglect for not following the care plan.
Failure to Protect Resident from Repeated Room Intrusions: A cognitively intact resident with depression and hip OA was repeatedly frightened when another resident with dementia and wandering behaviors entered her room, took belongings, and could not be reliably redirected. Staff used a stop sign banner and other barriers, but the other resident continued to enter the room, and the resident became so fearful that she requested discharge before completing her therapy goals.
Failure to protect a resident from alleged physical abuse: A resident with COPD, speech disturbances, and dysphagia reported that an LPN pushed them in the chest during med pass after they refused meds, causing them to fall. The resident had no visible injuries, but the report was documented by nursing staff and the NP, and the resident later reiterated by writing/gestures that the LPN pushed them. The LPN denied pushing the resident and described the contact as accidental, while the facility concluded there was no evidence of abuse.
A resident-to-resident sexual abuse allegation was not thoroughly investigated, and the resident was not promptly protected or monitored after the allegation. In a separate issue, a handwritten sign with personal care instructions was posted above another resident's bed, and an RT, LPN, RN, and CNA all acknowledged it was a privacy and dignity concern and against facility policy.
Failure to Protect Resident from Abuse During Feeding Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident’s right to be free from abuse during lunch assistive feeding. While standing about 3 feet from the lunch table, the surveyor heard a CNA aggressively slap Resident #56’s left wrist and observed the CNA grab the resident’s left wrist and roughly pull her hand off of his shirt sleeve after she had grabbed it. The surveyor then continued observing the meal and later reported the incident to the DON and Administrator. Resident #56 was assessed by a licensed nurse after the incident, and no bruises or cuts were found on her wrists. The CNA involved had been hired by the facility in 2024, had signed the facility’s Resident Abuse Procedural Summary, and had attended behavior training in 2026. The CNA also had three prior disciplinary actions, including a prior incident in which a resident choked after being given too large a bite during assistive feeding and required a Heimlich maneuver.
Failure to Protect Residents from Resident-to-Resident Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure two sampled residents were free from physical abuse by other residents. One resident with dementia, anxiety, chronic pain, visual hallucinations, and moderate cognitive impairment was involved in an altercation with a roommate after a disagreement about TV volume. The incident escalated when the roommate attempted to take the TV remote and struck the resident with an open hand, and the resident responded by scratching the roommate. The record also documented a new scratch on the resident’s left hand and later noted that the resident no longer wanted to share a room with the other resident. The other incident involved a resident with dementia and significant cognitive impairment who had a behavior care plan for impaired safety awareness and physically aggressive behaviors. The record stated that the resident clawed a roommate in the face, leaving superficial scratches and red marks on the roommate’s chin and cheek. The roommate’s record reflected ongoing monitoring for scratches to the chin and neck, and the roommate stated that the other resident reached up and ran fingernails across her face while they were getting up for breakfast. Facility documentation and staff interviews confirmed both resident-to-resident incidents. Staff described the first event as a physical altercation triggered by conflict over TV volume, and the second as an incident in which one resident scratched another resident’s face. The DON stated the facility investigated and reported the incidents, and also acknowledged that the documentation surrounding the second event was inconsistent and did not meet expectations or policy. The cited deficiency was based on the facility’s failure to ensure the residents were protected from physical abuse by other residents.
Failure to Follow Two-Person Transfer Plan Resulted in Resident Fractures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from neglect when staff did not follow the resident’s individualized transfer plan requiring assistance from two staff members. The resident was admitted with a left lower leg trimalleolar fracture, polyosteoarthritis, and muscle weakness, and the MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact but required total assistance for transfers and toileting. The comprehensive care plan and physician orders both directed staff to provide two-person assistance for transfers and to maintain non-weight-bearing status on the left lower extremity. During a transfer from the toilet to a wheelchair, one nurse aide assisted the resident without a second staff member. According to the documentation, the resident stood without difficulty, but during the pivot transfer the resident’s right foot turned inward and both the resident and the aide heard a loud pop. The resident immediately reported increased pain. Later that day, x-ray findings identified an acute fracture of the right tibia, and the resident was transferred to the hospital emergency department for further evaluation and treatment. Hospital imaging confirmed fractures of the distal right tibia and fibula, and the resident was scheduled for surgical repair. The facility’s investigation determined that the aide transferred the resident with only one staff member despite the care plan and physician order requiring two staff members, and that this failure directly resulted in the resident sustaining the fractures. The facility substantiated caregiver neglect and terminated the employee following the investigation.
Failure to Protect Resident from Repeated Room Intrusions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a cognitively intact resident with osteoarthritis of the right hip and major depressive disorder from mental abuse by another resident. The resident was admitted as a vulnerable adult and her care plan identified a goal of being free from abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation, but it did not include interventions to protect her from abuse. The resident later reported that another resident repeatedly entered her room, scared her, and took belongings, and she asked staff to contact her lawyer. She also began using a stop sign banner across her door and later barricaded her room with a walker, closet door, and bedside table because she was afraid of the other resident. The other resident had moderate cognitive impairment, vascular dementia with agitation, and Alzheimer’s disease, and his care plan documented restlessness, agitation, sundowning, wandering into other residents’ rooms, and urinating in public. Progress notes showed repeated episodes of wandering into other residents’ rooms, difficulty with redirection, aggression toward staff, and disruptive behavior in resident rooms. Notes also documented that he entered the affected resident’s room on multiple occasions, and staff observed that he could move barriers out of the way and continue entering the room despite attempts to block access. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was very scared of the other resident and that the repeated room intrusions continued over several days. Staff stated that stop sign banners did not stop him, closed doors did not stop him, and that it often took two or more staff to remove him from rooms. The resident requested discharge from the facility and left before reaching her maximal level with therapy services. Therapy documentation stated she was improving but still needed higher-level therapy before discharge, and the therapy director stated her early discharge was because she could not remain in the facility due to the other resident coming into her room. Facility records also showed staffing levels that were below the facility assessment on several shifts, and the assignment sheets did not identify a staff member assigned to 1:1 observation for the wandering resident.
Failure to Protect Resident from Alleged Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical abuse when a nurse allegedly made physical contact with the resident during medication administration. Resident #7, who had diagnoses including COPD, speech disturbances, and dysphagia, had intact cognition on the MDS dated 03/18/2026 and was care planned as at risk for misappropriation, neglect, abuse, and/or exploitation. On 04/08/2026, the resident reported to the RN supervisor that an LPN pushed them in the chest after they refused medications, causing them to fall to the floor. The resident was assessed and no visible injuries were noted. The resident’s report was documented in nursing and medical progress notes, and the facility’s investigation recorded that the resident was visibly upset while describing the incident. The LPN denied the allegation and stated that any contact was accidental, describing that the resident was close behind them as they left the room and that the resident’s chest contacted their back or shoulder. The RN supervisor, DON, and NP each documented interviews and assessments in which no bruising, swelling, or visible injury was found, and the resident later communicated by writing and gestures that they had told the LPN to leave the room and that the LPN pushed them in the chest and they fell. The facility concluded there was no evidence of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, despite the resident’s allegation and the conflicting accounts from the LPN and resident. The RN supervisor stated law enforcement was notified and police interviewed the resident and the LPN, but no report was filed. The DON later stated the contact was accidental and that the resident’s reporting was inconsistent regarding whether a fall occurred.
Failure to Protect Resident from Abuse and Maintain Privacy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse when a resident-to-resident sexual abuse allegation was not thoroughly investigated and the resident was not promptly protected or monitored after the allegation. The report states this involved 1 of 52 sampled residents, Resident 45, and that the deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for continued abuse, emotional distress, fear, anxiety, a diminished sense of safety, and delayed implementation of interventions necessary to protect the resident from further abuse. The facility also failed to protect the privacy and confidentiality of Resident 58. Resident 58 was admitted with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. During observation, a handwritten sign reading, "Attention please no briefs chucks only!!" was posted above the resident's bed and remained there on a later observation. Staff members including a Respiratory Therapist, LPN, RN, and CNA each acknowledged the sign was visible above the bed and stated it was a privacy, dignity, and policy issue. A facility Residents Rights policy stated residents have the right to privacy and confidentiality with personal care and medical records, and that resident medical and personal care information is private and staff are required to respect and uphold resident privacy at all times.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.