Failure to Review and Communicate Critical Lab Result to Physician
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to promptly review and communicate critical laboratory results to the attending physician in accordance with its Lab Monitoring and Lab Orders policies. A male resident with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, PTSD, and constipation, but no history or diagnosis of diabetes and no orders for insulin or blood glucose monitoring, reported abdominal discomfort and gastrointestinal issues. A nurse practitioner ordered a CBC and CMP after the resident complained of foul bowel odor, bad breath smell, and nausea. The following day, the lab drew the ordered tests, and the laboratory report showed a critically elevated blood glucose level of 934 mg/dL, with documentation that the critical result was called directly to the resident’s physician by the lab technician. The facility was not contacted by the lab, and there is no documentation that the physician notified the facility of the critical value. Facility staff did not identify or act on the critical lab result in a timely manner despite having access to the results through the Ring App and despite facility policy requiring that all lab results be reviewed by a nurse, dated and timed, and that critical values be called to the physician immediately. The 24-hour report noted that labs were done and described them as having a “negative outcome,” but did not document the critical glucose value or any physician notification. The ADON later printed the lab results from the Ring App and handed them to the nurse on duty, instructing her to contact or call the physician, but he stated he did not review the results himself. The nurse who received the printed results stated she did not review the lab values, assumed the ADON had already reviewed them, and only faxed them to the physician because the report indicated the physician was already aware. She did not confirm receipt of the fax and did not document any direct notification or follow-up with the physician regarding the critical value. Over the subsequent days, the resident continued to experience symptoms, including nausea and bowel issues, and asked staff about his lab results. One nurse directed him to ask another nurse, and the nurse who had been given the printed results denied that the resident asked her to read the results. On a later shift, another LVN observed that the resident appeared pale and was “talking differently,” prompting her to check his vital signs and then review the Ring App, where she saw the critically high glucose value of 945 mg/dL. She then checked the resident’s blood sugar with the facility glucometer and obtained a reading of 478 mg/dL, after which the resident was sent to the hospital. Interviews with the NP, Medical Director, ADONs, and nursing staff confirmed that the facility’s policies required nurses to review lab results, document the date and time of review, and promptly notify the physician of abnormal and critical values, and that this process was not followed for this resident’s critical glucose result. The failure to promptly notify the physician of the critical lab value and to follow the lab monitoring and lab orders policies constituted the deficiency. The report also documents that the facility’s Lab Monitoring policy required all lab results to be reviewed by a nurse, with the nurse dating and documenting the time the result was reviewed, and that critical lab results be called to the physician or on-call physician immediately. The Lab Orders policy required the facility to ensure timeliness of services, monitor lab orders daily, and ensure that all lab results were communicated to the physician in a timely manner, with proof of notification included on the lab report or in nurse’s notes. Interviews with the Administrator, ADON, and Medical Director confirmed that nurses were expected to review lab reports before forwarding them, to notify the physician of critical values, and not to assume that the physician had already been informed. In this case, multiple staff members acknowledged that the critical glucose value was not recognized or acted upon as required, and that the facility did not follow its own policies for lab review, tracking, and physician notification for this resident’s critical lab result.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Urine Culture and Sensitivity Not Obtained as Ordered: A resident with a suprapubic catheter, quadriplegia, and a history of UTI had cloudy, odorous urine and diaphoresis. Urology ordered the catheter changed and urine collected for C&S, but although the specimen was placed in the specimen refrigerator, no C&S results were received and the DON later verified the lab had no record of the specimen being picked up.
A resident with an indwelling catheter, nephrostomy tubes, and diagnoses including cystitis with hematuria and bladder cancer reported blood-tinged urine in a nephrostomy bag. An NP instructed staff to obtain a urine C&S, but the sample was not collected and no corresponding order appeared in the order recap. Later review showed only one urine test in the reviewed period, and the RN verified the ordered test was not completed.
Delayed Communication of Lab Results: A resident with DM, UTI, dysphagia, and impaired cognition had CBC and BMP results received by the facility in the evening, but the RN did not review and send them to the physician until the next morning. The DON confirmed the results should have been communicated promptly, and the facility policy required the attending physician to be notified as soon as test results were received.
Failure to Obtain Ordered BNP and TSH Labs: A resident with CHF, COPD, CAD, HTN, malnutrition, and moderate cognitive impairment had provider orders for a BNP to assess HF status and a TSH to monitor thyroid function while on Synthroid. When the ADON produced lab results, the BNP and TSH could not be found, and the ADON said she had even called the lab; the ordering provider later stated he did not remember the orders but suspected the BNP should have been completed if the other labs were done.
A resident with dysuria had urine testing ordered, and the lab later reported culture results showing the organism was resistant to Ciprofloxacin. Facility staff did not promptly notify the ordering practitioner of the culture result, and the resident continued receiving Ciprofloxacin before the MD was informed and changed the antibiotic to Keflex.
A resident receiving anticoagulant monitoring had an INR ordered as a repeat test after a subtherapeutic result, but the lab was not completed as ordered. Record review showed no INR report for the ordered draw, and an LPN confirmed the test was not done.
Urine Culture and Sensitivity Not Obtained as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a urine culture and sensitivity test was obtained timely and as ordered for a resident with an indwelling suprapubic catheter. The resident had multiple diagnoses including quadriplegia, extended spectrum beta lactamase, neurogenic bowel, chronic respiratory failure, urinary tract infection, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, chronic pain syndrome, diabetes, seizures, and hydronephrosis with ureteral stricture. A quarterly MDS assessment documented intact cognition and an indwelling catheter. On 05/19/26, the resident was noted to be diaphoretic with elevated blood pressure, and the catheter was draining cloudy, odorous urine. The catheter was flushed and continued draining, urology was contacted, and the nurse practitioner ordered a CBC and BMP. On 05/20/26, urology returned the call and ordered the suprapubic catheter changed in house, urine collected for culture, results faxed to urology, and minocycline started. The catheter was changed and the specimen was collected and placed in the specimen refrigerator, but the record contained no urine culture and sensitivity results from 05/20/26 through 05/29/26. The Corporate DON later verified the laboratory never received the specimen and had no record of the urine culture and sensitivity being picked up.
Failure to Obtain Ordered Urine Culture and Sensitivity
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a urine culture and sensitivity was obtained after an NP recommended it for a resident who reported blood-tinged urine in a nephrostomy bag. The resident had been admitted with diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes, acute cystitis with hematuria, acute kidney failure, and malignant neoplasm of the bladder, and nursing documentation noted she denied pain when she reported the blood-tinged urine. The NP was notified and instructed staff to obtain a urine sample for culture and sensitivity, but the record showed no urine culture was collected on that date and no order for the urine sample was present in the physician order recap. Record review showed the resident had impaired cognition, an indwelling catheter, and later care plans addressed alteration in elimination related to bilateral nephrostomy tubes and risk for urinary tract infection complications. Review of laboratory reports showed only one urine test during the reviewed period, collected later and resulting in growth of pseudomonas aeruginosa carbapenem resistant and klebsiella pneumoniae. During interview, the resident stated she had recently seen a urologist who capped the nephrostomy tubes and that she currently only had an ostomy; she denied current blood or pain. The RN verified the urine sample was not collected per the NP's recommendation and stated she was not sure why, and the facility policy stated staff would process test requisitions and arrange for tests.
Delayed Communication of Lab Results
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that laboratory results for one sampled resident were communicated to the physician in a timely manner. Resident 1 was admitted and later readmitted to the facility with diagnoses including type 2 DM, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia, UTI, history of falling, and depression. The resident’s H&P stated the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions, while the MDS later indicated severely impaired cognition and dependence or assistance with several activities of daily living. A CBC and BMP were completed for Resident 1 and the laboratory report showed the results were sent to the facility at 9:41 p.m. RN 3 reviewed the results the next morning at 6:59 a.m. and confirmed during interview that he then sent the results to the resident’s physician. RN 3 stated he worked the 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift. The DON reviewed the same laboratory results and confirmed they were received by the facility on the evening they were sent, and stated the results should have been sent to the physician as soon as possible and should not have waited until the next day. The facility policy stated that when test results are provided to the facility, the attending physician shall be promptly notified and that the charge nurse receiving the results is responsible for notifying the physician.
Failure to Obtain Ordered BNP and TSH Labs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain provider-ordered laboratory tests for one resident, including a BNP and a TSH level. The resident was admitted with a medical history that included acute on chronic congestive heart failure, COPD, hypertension, coronary artery disease with a history of myocardial infarction, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. The admission MDS assigned a BIMS score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. A history and physical note signed by the Medical Director ordered a BNP to assess the resident’s current heart failure status, along with CBC, CMP, and magnesium levels. A provider progress note later ordered a TSH level because the resident had a history of hyperthyroidism and was receiving Synthroid 50 mg daily. When the ADON provided lab results, the BNP and TSH could not be produced, and the ADON stated, "I even called the lab." The ordering provider later stated he did not remember the orders but suspected the BNP should have been done if the other labs were completed.
Delayed Notification of Urine Culture Results
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician or clinical practitioner of a laboratory result for one resident. The resident had been assessed by the attending physician for discomfort during urination, declined a genitourinary examination, and was ordered to have a urinalysis and urine culture obtained. Nursing staff collected the urine specimen and sent it to the lab, and the urinalysis results were forwarded to the facility and later reported to the attending physician, who then ordered Ciprofloxacin for cystitis. The urine culture results were forwarded to the facility and showed abnormal findings, including that Ciprofloxacin was resistant to the organism identified. A nursing progress note later documented that the attending physician was made aware of the urine culture results, and the physician discontinued Ciprofloxacin and started Keflex for a urinary tract infection. The resident received additional doses of Ciprofloxacin after the facility had already been notified by the lab that the organism was resistant to that antibiotic.
Missed INR Lab Order for Resident on Anticoagulant Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain laboratory services as ordered for one resident who was being monitored for anticoagulant therapy. Resident #5 had a physician order for an INR to be drawn on 4/27/26, but review of the medical record showed no INR laboratory report for that date. An After-Hours Telehealth Consult note dated 4/26/26 documented that the resident’s INR was subtherapeutic based on lab results from 4/26/26, and the provider ordered a repeat INR for 4/27/26. During interview on 4/29/26, an LPN confirmed that the INR was not completed as ordered.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.