Inaccurate Dementia Diagnosis Documentation and Mismanaged Elopement Risk Records
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain complete, accurate, accessible, and systematically organized medical records for a male resident with a history of cerebral infarction, osteoarthritis, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and documented dementia. The resident’s admission MDS showed a BIMS score of 13 (cognitively intact) with an active diagnosis of non‑Alzheimer’s dementia and no wandering behaviors. His clinical history and a Mental Illness/Dementia Resident Review signed by the MD indicated a dementia diagnosis, and the MD attested on 11/11/2025 that the resident had a primary or dementia diagnosis. The care plan initiated in October and revised in late November documented impaired cognitive function/dementia, use of Donepezil for dementia, and psychiatric diagnoses, as well as risk for falls and safety concerns related to leaving the facility without notice. Despite these records, on 11/27/2025 the RNC struck out dementia as a primary diagnosis from the resident’s medical diagnoses, and the diagnosis no longer appeared on the face sheet. The RNC reported she discontinued the dementia diagnosis based on the resident’s high BIMS score and nursing assessments, after a verbal conversation with the MD, but she did not document this conversation or any justification for changing the medical record. The MD confirmed he approved discontinuation of the dementia diagnosis after being informed of the BIMS score, but he was not aware of the resident’s exit‑seeking behaviors or elopements, and there was no documentation of those behaviors in his or his NP’s notes. At the same time, the resident continued to be care planned and medicated for dementia, and psychiatric notes documented cognitive impairment symptoms, including decreased concentration, forgetfulness, difficulties with ADLs, disorientation to situation, and unreliable history. The facility also failed to accurately and consistently complete and document the resident’s elopement risk evaluations. Progress notes described multiple episodes of exit‑seeking and elopement, including the resident going to the facility gate wanting to go home, two elopement episodes leading to transfer to a psychiatric hospital with police involvement, and an incident where he independently left and checked himself into a local hospital. Staff interviews (LVN, RN, previous SW) described the resident as an elopement risk, with behaviors such as exit‑seeking, frequent talk of leaving, digging under the fence, and requiring 1:1 monitoring. However, elopement risk evaluations on 11/02/2025 and 11/27/2025 were locked as “No Risk,” and staff only completed the “No Risk” section despite triggers for moderate or imminent risk. These evaluations contained internal discrepancies regarding the resident’s ability to make decisions and ambulate, and the care plan revised on 11/27/2025 did not reflect the documented elopement attempt and actual elopements on 10/24/2025, 11/02/2025, and 11/27/2025. The DON and ADM acknowledged the importance of accurate records and documentation of physician notifications and elopements, but the facility’s records for this resident remained inconsistent with his diagnoses, behaviors, and treatment. The facility’s own Medical Record Content policy required accurate, timely, and complete records that support diagnoses, justify medical necessity, and facilitate continuity of care, including consistent assessments and progress notes aligned with care plans and documented physician notifications and orders. In this case, there was no documentation of the physician order or rationale to discontinue the dementia diagnosis, no integration of the PASRR/MD‑signed dementia attestation into the record review, and incomplete elopement risk assessments that did not match the resident’s documented behaviors and staff observations. These inconsistencies resulted in a medical record that did not accurately reflect the resident’s active diagnoses, dementia treatment, or elopement risk status as required by facility policy and accepted professional standards. The DON stated that residents with high BIMS scores or who could make decisions were not considered elopement risks, and that if a resident had dementia but could make decisions, they were not an elopement risk. This view contrasted with other staff who identified the resident as an elopement risk regardless of his BIMS score. The administrator also stated that the resident was not an elopement risk because of his high BIMS score and lack of dementia, and he asserted that certain nursing notes about elopement were not accurate. These differing interpretations and the lack of consistent documentation contributed to the inaccurate and incomplete medical record for the resident, including the discrepancy between the discontinued dementia diagnosis and ongoing dementia‑related care and medications, as well as the under‑documented and misclassified elopement risk.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Incomplete and inaccurate medication orders were found for two residents after record review and staff interviews. One resident’s Toujeo insulin glargine order listed conflicting clinical indications, with staff stating the order had been mistyped, and another resident’s hydroxyzine HCl PRN anxiety order omitted the dose even though the resident had previously been receiving 25 mg tablets.
Missing discharge and transfer orders in resident records: The DON confirmed that discharge or transfer orders were not obtained or documented for multiple residents. One resident was discharged back to an ALF in stable condition after insulin instructions were reviewed, another had a note stating the MD ordered hospital transfer but the order was not completed in the record, and a third had respiratory distress and altered mental status with an MD order to send to the ER, but no transfer order was found. The facility policy required a physician order for emergency transfer or discharge.
Incomplete death documentation: A resident’s record lacked progress notes and an incident report describing what occurred when the resident passed away in the facility. Although the chart included the POLST, death record, MDS, and an encounter note stating CPR was started and 911 was called, facility leaders verified there were no documents covering the morning of the death.
A resident with depression, chronic pain, and COPD had an order for PRN oxycodone 10 mg. The medication was signed out on the narcotic accountability record multiple times, but there was no matching MAR documentation. The LVNs stated they administered the doses but failed to chart them on the MAR due to human error, and the DON confirmed the documentation was incomplete.
Incomplete Documentation of Care Conference Participation: The facility failed to accurately document whether two residents or their responsible parties were informed of, attended, or declined quarterly care plan conferences. One resident had COPD, seizures, dysphagia, hypotension, and cognitive impairment, while the other had AFib, HF, HTN, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, dementia, and depression. Care conference forms showed staff attendance, but the sections for resident or RP participation were left blank, and an LVN acknowledged she did not document the invitations or attendance status in the EMR.
Incomplete Documentation of Chronic Scalp Wound: A resident with a chronic scalp lesion/wound had inconsistent and incomplete skin/wound documentation in the EMR. Weekly skin assessments sometimes omitted the lesion entirely, and when it was documented, key details such as size, shape, color, and drainage were missing. The record also lacked documentation of a comprehensive assessment after maggots were found and removed from the wound, and staff acknowledged the chart did not provide a complete picture of the wound status or care provided.
Incomplete and inaccurate medication orders in resident records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a physician order was clarified for its clinical indication and medication dosage, resulting in inaccurate documentation in the resident medical record. The deficiency was identified through record review and staff interviews and involved 2 of 2 residents reviewed. The facility’s documentation policy stated that the resident medical record should be accurate, objective, and clinically relevant. One resident was admitted and readmitted with diagnoses including morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation and diabetes. A physician order listed Toujeo SoloStar insulin glargine 300 units/ml as 120 units subcutaneously one time a day related to morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, and also listed Toujeo SoloStar insulin glargine 300 units/ml as 120 units subcutaneously at bedtime related to type 2 diabetes. During interview, the CRN stated the evening dose was for diabetes and the morning dose was for obesity, then later stated the insulin glargine order should have been for diabetes and not obesity and had been mistyped by the nurse. Another resident was admitted and readmitted with diagnoses including quadriplegia, depression, and anxiety disorder. That resident’s MAR showed an order for hydroxyzine HCl every 8 hours as needed for anxiety, but the order did not include a dose. The CNO confirmed the dose was missing and stated the resident had previously been receiving hydroxyzine 25 mg tablets and the person entering the order did not catch the 25 mg.
Missing discharge and transfer orders in resident records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that discharge or transfer orders were present in the medical records for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for discharge. Resident #120 was admitted with diagnoses including type I diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, gastroparesis, schizophrenia, depression, hypothyroidism, dysphagia, anemia, hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, and long-term insulin use. A health status note documented that the resident was discharged back to an ALF in stable condition, with discharge instructions provided and explained, insulin administration reviewed, and transportation arranged by facility staff; however, the DON stated that no discharge orders were obtained. Resident #3 was admitted with diagnoses including hyperkalemia, gastrostomy care, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, acute kidney failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, COPD, atherosclerotic heart disease, anemia in chronic kidney disease, and muscle weakness. A progress note stated that the MD reviewed labs and ordered the resident sent to the hospital, but the record did not contain the completed order, and the DON stated the paperwork had been completed for discharge but no physician order was written. Resident #118 was admitted with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, dysphagia following CVA, and muscle weakness; a progress note documented respiratory distress and altered mental status, with the MD notified and ordered the resident sent to the ER, but the physician orders did not show an order to transfer the resident from the facility to the hospital. The facility policy required a physician order for emergency transfer or discharge and for anticipated discharge to the community.
Incomplete Death Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a complete, accurate, and readily accessible medical record for one resident, R29, related to the resident’s death in the facility. R29’s hospital discharge summary showed discharge to the nursing home in stable condition, and the POLST indicated attempt CPR. The death record listed the date of death, and the MDS assessment indicated death in facility, but the progress notes did not document the resident’s death or what occurred. The encounter note stated that a call was received that R29 had passed away that morning, CPR was started, and 911 was called. When the state agency requested the incident report and medical record items related to the day of death, the facility did not have an incident report or progress note documenting what occurred that morning. During interview, the administrator and VPS-A and VPS-B verified the facility did not have documents of what occurred the morning of R29’s death.
Incomplete Documentation of Controlled Substance Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1’s medical record was accurately documented and complete when controlled substance administration was signed out on the narcotic accountability record but not documented on the MAR. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including depression, chronic pain, and COPD, and had a BIM'S score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The care plan included administering medications as ordered, and the June 2026 physician orders included Oxycodone 10 mg every 6 hours as needed for pain. Record review showed that Oxycodone 10 mg was signed out on the controlled substance administration log on 6/15/2026 at 4:30 AM, 10:30 AM, and 4:30 PM, but there was no corresponding documentation on the MAR for those administrations. During interview, the resident stated he was not 100% sure whether he received the medication at those times. The LVN staff assigned to those shifts stated they administered the Oxycodone as recorded on the controlled substance log but did not document it on the MAR due to human error, and the DON confirmed that nursing staff had not been recording controlled substances on the MAR after signing them out on the narcotic count record.
Incomplete Documentation of Care Conference Participation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented for 2 residents reviewed for documentation. For both residents, the electronic medical record did not show whether the resident or the responsible party had been informed of, attended, declined, or otherwise participated in the quarterly care conference meetings. The deficiency was identified through record review and interviews, and the Care Conference & DC Case Management Evaluation forms did not reflect resident or responsible party attendance status. Resident #9 was a female with diagnoses including COPD, seizures, dysphagia, hypotension, and major depressive disorder. Her MDS showed unclear speech, moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 8, wheelchair use, and varying levels of assistance with eating, dressing, transfers, bed mobility, and toileting. Her care plan included impaired cognitive function and psychosocial well-being focus areas with interventions to provide opportunities for the resident and family to participate in care. The care conference evaluations reviewed for this resident showed that conferences were held in person with staff attendance, but the section for resident or responsible party participation was not completed, and no evaluation was available for two of the expected quarterly conferences. Resident #24 was a female with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, dementia, and major depressive disorder. Her MDS showed intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15 and no vision, hearing, or communication deficits, along with dependence in several activities of daily living. Her care plan included falls, altered cardiovascular status, discharge planning, and activity involvement, with interventions involving the resident or family. The care conference evaluations reviewed for this resident showed in-person conferences attended by facility staff, but the form did not document whether the resident or responsible party attended, refused, or were invited and absent. During interview, the resident stated she was aware of care plan meetings but could not recall being invited every 90 days and said she chose not to attend because little changed. An LVN acknowledged she invited the resident and sent invitations to the responsible party but did not document that information in the EMR, and the DON stated the form was expected to be completed in its entirety.
Incomplete Documentation of Chronic Scalp Wound
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for a resident with a chronic scalp lesion/wound. Weekly skin assessments from 6/2/25-6/29/25 and 11/2/25-11/16/25 contained no documentation of the resident’s scalp lesion/wound, while assessments from 7/6/25-9/28/25 and 12/14/25-6/14/26 documented the presence of the lesion/wound but did not include complete details such as size, shape, color, or drainage characteristics. The resident’s electronic medical record also showed no documentation that a comprehensive assessment of the chronic scalp lesion/wound was completed after maggots were identified and removed from the lesion/wound on 6/12/26. During interviews, staff stated that weekly skin assessments were completed, that nursing staff were expected to document skin and wound assessments, and that documentation should include at minimum a description of the skin concern, wound description or measurements, shape, color, drainage, and odor. Staff acknowledged the record did not contain all information needed to provide a complete picture of the resident’s wound status and related care provided.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.