Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Functionally Accessible Call Light for Dependent Resident

Bell Gardens, California Survey Completed on 02-11-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to reasonably accommodate a resident’s needs and preferences by not providing an appropriate and usable call light. The resident, who had diagnoses including muscle weakness and hypertension, was care planned to have a call light within reach and answered promptly. The resident’s H&P documented that he did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions, while the MDS indicated he was usually able to understand and be understood, and was dependent for most ADLs and mobility, including transfers and toileting. During interview, the resident reported not knowing where his call light was, being unable to press it because he could not move his arms and hands, and stated he sometimes felt powerless and ignored, resorting to yelling or waiting until someone entered the room, and that when he called, he would be dirty and wanted to be cleaned. On observation with a CNA, the resident’s call light was found not within reach, and the CNA then placed it within reach. The resident reiterated he could not use the call light due to inability to move his arms and hands. The CNA acknowledged she had not asked the resident if he could use the call light and stated that not being able to use and access the call light could lead to feelings of neglect, delay in care, and in assisting the resident’s needs. The MDS nurse stated he was not aware the resident could not use the call light. The facility’s policy on call lights required that each resident be evaluated for unique needs and preferences to determine any special accommodations needed to utilize the call system and that the facility be adequately equipped with a call light at each resident’s bedside, toilet, and bathing area to allow residents to call for assistance.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙