Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0584
E

Persistent Musty Urine Odor on One Hall Undermining Homelike Environment

Mount Pleasant, Texas Survey Completed on 02-23-2026

Penalty

Fine: $17,220
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on Hall C by not ensuring the area was free of offensive, musty urine odors. Over multiple days of observation, surveyors repeatedly noted a musty urine odor on Hall C at various times of day. On several occasions, staff present on the hall, including a CNA, the Social Worker, and the Corporate Compliance Nurse, acknowledged smelling an offensive odor, though some were unable to identify its exact source. At one point, staff were observed transferring soiled laundry with a pungent musty urine odor from a resident’s room into a bag after learning that the resident’s family was not actually washing the resident’s laundry, contrary to what the resident had told staff. Interviews with facility leadership and staff showed inconsistent awareness of the odor problem. The Housekeeper Supervisor attributed the odor to a possible incontinence episode in the hallway or someone walking by. The ADON and DON both stated they had not noticed any offensive or urine odors on Hall C and reported that residents had not complained to them about odors. They each stated that all staff were responsible for ensuring the facility did not have offensive odors, and the DON described expectations that CNAs change sheets on shower days, clean mattresses when necessary, and keep residents clean and dry to prevent odors. The facility’s undated Resident Rights policy stated that residents are to be provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment and that staff and management are to minimize institutional characteristics, including institutional odors, but the persistent musty urine odor on Hall C demonstrated a failure to meet this standard during the survey period.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙