Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
D

Failure to Administer Ordered Medication After Known Food Allergy Exposure

Bristol, Rhode Island Survey Completed on 02-05-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure services were provided in accordance with professional standards of quality by not following a physician’s order for a resident who had a known tomato allergy. The resident, admitted with dementia and with a documented tomato allergy of unknown severity in the electronic health record since June 2025, consumed food containing red tomato sauce. A nurse practitioner documented that the resident had eaten red tomato sauce despite the allergy and ordered a one-time dose of Reglan 10 mg with continued close monitoring for any signs and symptoms of allergic reaction. A corresponding physician’s order for Reglan 10 mg once was entered on the same date. Review of the Medication Administration Record for that month showed Reglan coded as “9” by an LPN, indicating to refer to progress notes. A progress note by the same LPN documented that the Reglan was pending delivery from the pharmacy, and there was no evidence in the record that the medication was ever administered or that the provider was notified that the ordered medication was not given. An inventory summary for the facility’s Pyxis automated dispensing machine showed that it routinely stocked at least three 5 mg Reglan tablets. In an interview, the LPN acknowledged that the Reglan was not administered and could not provide evidence of provider notification, and the Director of Nursing stated that Reglan is regularly stocked in the Pyxis and that she would have expected the medication to be administered as ordered and the provider notified and documentation completed if it was not.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙