Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
E

Failure to Follow Antihypertensive Medication Parameters for Two Residents

Shippensburg, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 02-02-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to administer antihypertensive medications in accordance with physician orders and facility policy for two residents. Facility policy required medications to be administered according to orders, including time frames and verification of vital signs when necessary. For a resident with Parkinson’s disease and hypertension, multiple physician orders for Lisinopril 2.5 mg included specific systolic blood pressure (SBP) parameters for administration and PRN use. Review of the August and September 2025 and January 2026 MARs showed that Lisinopril was administered when SBP values were below or outside the ordered parameters on numerous dates, including SBPs such as 118, 119, 122, 123, 131, 132, 137, 138, 139, and 140 when the order required higher SBP thresholds. Additionally, the PRN Lisinopril ordered for SBP greater than 140 was not administered on multiple dates when SBP readings met or exceeded that threshold, including readings of 140, 141, 143, 144, 149, 151, 153, 154, 156, 161, and 170. For a second resident with hypertension and heart failure, physician orders specified hydralazine HCL 20 mg twice daily with instructions to hold the medication for blood pressure less than 100/60. Review of the January 2026 MAR revealed that hydralazine was administered despite blood pressure readings below the ordered hold parameters, including 98/50, 96/57, and 84/51. During an interview, the DON stated that the facility’s expectation was that medications be administered in accordance with physician orders and ordered parameters. The survey findings concluded that the facility did not ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician-ordered parameters for these two residents.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙