Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0602
E

Misappropriation and Poor Control of Residents’ Narcotic Medications

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 02-26-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to protect residents from misappropriation of property by not ensuring accurate control, documentation, and safeguarding of multiple residents' controlled medications. Facility policies on Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation and on Medication Ordering and Receiving from Pharmacy required protection of resident property and special ordering, receipt, and recordkeeping for controlled substances. Despite these policies, controlled substance records for several residents showed discrepancies between documented administration and remaining pill counts, and in one case, the absence of any controlled substance record for a prescribed PRN narcotic. For one resident with heart failure, diabetes, and depression, physician orders included MS Contin 15 mg at bedtime, MS Contin 30 mg twice daily, and Oxycodone 5 mg every eight hours as needed for pain. Review of the controlled substance record for MS Contin 15 mg showed that on a specific date the resident was documented as receiving two tablets, with a starting count of 25 and an ending count of 21, which did not reconcile. For MS Contin 30 mg twice daily, the record showed that on two dates the resident was documented as receiving three tablets, with a starting count of 18 and an ending count of 11, again not reconciling. Additionally, there was no controlled substance record for the resident’s Oxycodone 5 mg PRN from the date of order initiation through the date of review, even though the pharmacy confirmed dispensing 18 tablets. Another resident with coronary artery disease, COPD, and osteoarthritis had an order for Oxycodone 7.5 mg every eight hours as needed; the controlled substance record showed that on two dates the resident was documented as receiving one tablet, with a starting count of 40 and an ending count of 36, which did not match the documented usage. A third resident with high blood pressure, depression, and spina bifida had an order for MS Contin 15 mg three times daily. The controlled substance record indicated that on two dates the resident was documented as receiving two tablets, with a starting count of 38 and an ending count of 32, reflecting a discrepancy. A fourth resident with high blood pressure, depression, and neuropathy had an order for Oxycodone 5 mg every 12 hours as needed; the record showed that on one date the resident was documented as receiving one tablet, with a starting count of 12 and an ending count of 9, which did not reconcile. A fifth resident with heart failure, COPD, and muscle spasms had an order for Oxycodone 10 mg three times daily; the controlled substance record showed that on two dates the resident was documented as receiving four tablets, with a starting count of six and an ending count of two, while the resident was reported to have slept all night. Staff interviews further described events surrounding these discrepancies. A RN supervisor reported working a double shift while an agency RN worked the overnight shift; the oncoming RN identified that one resident’s Oxycodone count was four tablets short. The agency RN stated she might have given a double dose and could not account for the remaining tablets. The RN supervisor notified the DON and adjusted the narcotic count so the oncoming nurse could begin medication administration. Another RN later noted that while her narcotic counts were correct at shift change, the controlled substance records contained documentation discrepancies, including inconsistent count changes for one resident’s MS Contin and documentation of Oxycodone administration to another resident who had reportedly slept all night. The Nursing Home Administrator and DON acknowledged that an agency RN allegedly took multiple residents’ narcotics and confirmed that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property. The facility did not provide documentation showing that the missing narcotics were reported to the Department of Health.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙