Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0755
E

Inaccurate Documentation and Handling of Controlled Medications

Miami, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 02-27-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that medication administration records (MARs) and controlled drug count sheets accurately reflected the disposition of controlled medications for multiple residents. Facility policy required that each dose of medication be properly recorded on the MAR and that when a CMA was unable to administer a medication, the charge nurse be notified immediately. For one resident with an order for Norco 10-325 mg every four hours as needed for pain, comparisons between the February MAR and the individual narcotic record from late January to late February showed repeated discrepancies: on multiple dates, the narcotic record reflected more doses signed out than were documented as administered on the MAR, with no notation that the unaccounted tablets were destroyed. The resident reported they kept their own notes on pain pill use and, when compared to the facility’s narcotic records, found the records were not accurate. A second resident had an order for Ativan 1 mg at bedtime. Review of the February MAR and the corresponding narcotic record showed that on numerous dates the narcotic record indicated a dose was administered, while the MAR documented that the dose was refused. There was no documentation on the narcotic record that the refused tablets were destroyed. On another date, the MAR showed the medication was administered, but no dose was signed out on the narcotic record. An additional undated narcotic entry, located after a late-February entry, showed a dose as administered while the MAR documented a refusal for that same time frame, again without any destruction notation. A third resident had an order for tramadol 50 mg, two tablets every six hours as needed for pain. For this resident, the narcotic record showed two tablets administered on a specific February date, while the MAR showed no tramadol doses given that day and there was no documentation that the tablets were destroyed. During interviews, CMAs and nursing staff acknowledged that the MARs and narcotic records for these residents were inaccurate and showed pills signed out without documentation of administration or destruction. Staff described that refused controlled medications were supposed to be taken to the charge nurse and destroyed together with both parties initialing the count sheet, but one CMA reported they had been destroying refused medications alone without notifying the nurse, contrary to the described procedure. The DON stated that some CMAs had not been following the procedure to alert charge nurses of refused narcotics and to jointly destroy and document them.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙