Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0759
D

Medication Administration Errors Resulting in Exceeded Medication Error Rate

Twinsburg, Ohio Survey Completed on 02-10-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure medications were administered in accordance with professional standards of practice, resulting in a medication error rate of 5.12%, which exceeded the required rate of less than 5%. During a medication pass observation, there were two errors out of 39 opportunities. For one resident with chronic kidney disease, reduced mobility, and lumbar intervertebral disc displacement, the care plan identified risk for gastrointestinal complications due to constipation with an intervention to administer medications as ordered. The physician had ordered MiraLAX 17 g by mouth once daily for constipation, but during observation the assigned LPN reported that the MiraLAX was not available and stated the resident would receive it the following day, indicating the ordered medication was not administered as prescribed. Another resident, admitted with type II diabetes mellitus and care planned for diabetes management with an intervention to administer medications as ordered, had a physician’s order for insulin lispro 6 units SQ before meals, to be held if blood sugar was less than 150. The resident had severe cognitive impairment but did not reject care and was largely independent with several ADLs. During observed medication administration, an LPN checked the resident’s blood sugar, found it to be 238, attached a needle to the insulin lispro pen, dialed the pen to 6 units, and administered the insulin SQ without priming the pen. In a subsequent interview, the LPN confirmed she did not prime the pen and stated that pens are never primed. Review of the insulin pen manufacturer’s instructions showed that a safety test (priming) of 2 units must be performed before each injection to ensure the pen and needle are working properly and to ensure the correct dose, demonstrating that the insulin was not administered in accordance with professional standards and manufacturer guidance.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙