Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Update Care Plan After Change in Code Status

Waynesville, North Carolina Survey Completed on 02-19-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to update a resident’s care plan to reflect a change in code status from Full Code to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The resident was admitted with dementia and epilepsy and had a death with dignity care plan that documented a wish for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to be attempted. A social worker’s progress note documented that the resident’s family changed the code status to DNR, and a physician subsequently wrote a DNR order. The resident’s comprehensive MDS indicated he was rarely or never understood, underscoring reliance on documented directives rather than resident self-report. Despite these documented changes, the care plan continued to list the resident as Full Code. During interviews, the social worker confirmed the code status change and described the process of placing new or updated code status forms in the physician’s notebook for review and signature, with the physician then writing an order in the chart. The social worker did not recall informing the MDS nurses of the code status change or whether it was discussed in the morning meeting. The two MDS nurses, who stated they were responsible for updating care plans including code status changes, reported they relied on information from the morning meeting for changes in orders or resident condition and did not recall the code status change being reported. The Administrator stated that the resident’s current code status should be reflected on the care plan and acknowledged that the care plan should have been updated when the code status changed.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙